Evaluation of Performance of Industrial-Scale Dual Fluidized Bed Gasifiers Using the Chalmers 2–4-MWth Gasifier

A general approach to evaluating the performance of industrial-scale dual fluidized bed (DFB) gasifiers was developed in this work. The approach is intended to simplify comprehensive evaluation of DFB gasifiers and to highlight important parameters, some of which are often missed or omitted in the literature. By applying this procedure, experimental results can be generalized, which is verified in this work using the Chalmers 2–4-MWth DFB gasifier. In a DFB gasifier, some of the fuel is converted to the desired calorific gas, while the remaining portion is combusted to meet the heat demands of the process. As shown here, the total heat demands limit the amount of chemical energy that can be restored from the fuel into the produced gas, whereby the main heat demands are from the drying and heating of the fuel, in addition to heating the combustion air and steam. By establishing a heat balance across the system, the chemical efficiency can be estimated. With lower heat demands, higher chemical efficiency is achievable, whereas with higher heat demands, more of the fuel must be burned and a lower chemical efficiency is achieved. It is experimentally complicated to quantify the level of fuel conversion and heat demands of a DFB gasification system. In this work, an experimental procedure is presented and implemented using the Chalmers gasifier to quantify the fuel conversion and heat demands. Furthermore, it was investigated how a variation in the amount of steam used for fluidization of the gasifier affects fuel conversion and other important parameters. To establish a reference case, silica sand was used as bed material and wood pellets was used as fuel to minimize the effects of ash and the bed material. By increasing the level of fluidization steam, the average residence time of the gas was decreased and the gas temperature, gas velocity, and steam-to-fuel ratio were increased, which resulted in increased conversion (up to 36%) of organic compounds (OC). However, limited char conversion was achieved (0%–4%), and the chemical efficiency remained unaffected by the amount of steam added to the process. The chemical efficiency of the Chalmers gasifier was determined to be 74% when using wood pellets as fuel. This is comparable to results from thermo-economic modeling of second-generation biofuels production processes, which, based on the heat demand, report the chemical efficiency of the DFB gasifier as being in the range of 74%–77% to maximize the overall efficiency. This shows that the required chemical efficiency is achieved, even with low char conversion, when using a fuel with a high content of volatiles, such as wood pellets.

[1]  F. Maréchal,et al.  Thermochemical production of liquid fuels from biomass: Thermo-economic modeling, process design and process integration analysis , 2010 .

[2]  Hermann Hofbauer,et al.  Stoichiometric Water Consumption of Steam Gasification by the FICFB‐Gasification Process , 2008 .

[3]  Simon Harvey,et al.  Assessment of the energy and economic performance of second generation biofuel production processes using energy market scenarios , 2011 .

[4]  Colomba Di Blasi,et al.  Combustion and gasification rates of lignocellulosic chars , 2009 .

[5]  Sylvain Salvador,et al.  The gasification reactivity of high-heating-rate chars in single and mixed atmospheres of H2O and CO2 , 2013 .

[6]  José Corella,et al.  A Review on Dual Fluidized-Bed Biomass Gasifiers , 2007 .

[7]  Xiaoping Chen,et al.  Investigation of solid mixing mechanisms in a bubbling fluidized bed using a DEM—CFD approach , 2012 .

[8]  F. Maréchal,et al.  Thermo-economic process model for thermochemical production of Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) from lignocellulosic biomass , 2009 .

[9]  Hermann Hofbauer,et al.  Hydrodynamics of a dual fluidized-bed gasifier—Part I: simulation of a riser with gas injection and diffuser , 2003 .

[10]  A. Gómez-Barea,et al.  Characterization and prediction of biomass pyrolysis products , 2011 .

[11]  F. Johnsson,et al.  Lateral fuel dispersion in a large-scale bubbling fluidized bed , 2012 .

[12]  K. Sjöström,et al.  Provisional protocol for the sampling and anlaysis of tar and particulates in the gas from large-scale biomass gasifiers. Version 1998 ☆ , 2000 .

[13]  C. M. van der Meijden,et al.  Development of the MILENA gasification technology for the production of Bio-SNG , 2010 .

[14]  Jie He,et al.  Review of syngas production via biomass DFBGs , 2011 .

[15]  Charlotte K. Williams,et al.  The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials , 2006, Science.

[16]  J. Corella,et al.  Biomass gasification with pure steam in fluidised bed: 12 variables that affect the effectiveness of the biomass gasifier , 2008 .

[17]  H. Hofbauer,et al.  Gasification of wood in a dual fluidized bed gasifier: Influence of fuel feeding on process performance , 2013 .

[18]  Claes Brage,et al.  Use of amino phase adsorbent for biomass tar sampling and separation , 1997 .

[19]  T. Schildhauer,et al.  Liquid-Quench Sampling System for the Analysis of Gas Streams from Biomass Gasification Processes. Part 1: Sampling Noncondensable Compounds , 2012 .

[20]  Anders Nordin,et al.  Bed Agglomeration Characteristics during Fluidized Bed Combustion of Biomass Fuels , 2000 .

[21]  A. Gómez-Barea,et al.  Modeling of biomass gasification in fluidized bed , 2010 .

[22]  Priyanka Kaushal,et al.  Steam assisted biomass gasification—an overview , 2012 .

[23]  Gennadij I. Palconok.  Heat and Mass Transfer to a Single Particle in Fluidized Bed , 1998 .

[24]  Hermann Hofbauer,et al.  Performance improvement of dual fluidized bed gasifiers by temperature reduction: The behavior of tar species in the product gas , 2013 .

[25]  Hermann Hofbauer,et al.  Steam gasification of various feedstocks at a dual fluidised bed gasifier: Impacts of operation conditions and bed materials , 2011 .