Abstract Rats lived in a laboratory environment that simulated foraging costs with bar-pressing requirements. The rats encountered sequential opportunities to eat meals in two food patches that differed in the size and/or price of food pellets. The rats accepted more opportunities and ate larger meals in the patch offering the more-profitable food, whether the larger or the lower-priced pellets. Despite widely varying patterns of intake between the patches, total daily intake was constant across most conditions. The extent to which the less-profitable food was included in the diet was a function of the size of the profitability difference. Profitability at each patch was calculated both as g earned per bar press and as g earned per min during meals. These two measures were correlated, but relative g/min was a better predictor of the relative feeding patterns. The results were not in accord with a simple, effort-minimization model of optimal foraging, although they were compatible with the notion that the cost of suboptimal behaviour will influence its occurrence.
[1]
L. Kaufman,et al.
The economics of the law of effect.
,
1986,
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[2]
W M Baum,et al.
On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.
,
1974,
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[3]
A. Kacelnik.
CENTRAL PLACE FORAGING IN STARLINGS (STURNUS-VULGARIS) .1. PATCH RESIDENCE TIME
,
1984
.
[4]
T. Schoener.
Theory of Feeding Strategies
,
1971
.
[5]
R. Herrnstein.
On the law of effect.
,
1970,
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[6]
Caloric regulation and patterns of food choice in a patchy environment: The value and cost of alternative foods
,
1987,
Physiology & Behavior.
[7]
E. Charnov.
Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.
,
1976,
Theoretical population biology.