The dynamic elastic response to impulse synchronisation of composite prosthetic energy storing and returning feet

In this research, it is proven that perfect synchronisation between the input impulse (human effort) and the ground reaction impulse/impact can result in a phenomenon called the dynamic elastic response to impulse synchronisation with favourable consequences to the behaviour of the energy storing and returning foot. An energy storing and returning composite prosthetic foot was first used in elite competition at the 1988 Paralympic Games. Since its introduction, the prostheses have proven to be a source of controversy. In 2008, it was concluded that the athletes who use such technology when running are in an advantageous position when compared to able-bodied athletes. However, these findings have since been disputed. There still remain unanswered questions regarding the level of contribution of energy storing and returning feet in the performance of amputee athletes. A series of investigations have previously been conducted to study the dynamic characteristics of a number of energy storing and returning composite prosthetic feet. It was found that if a sinusoidal input impulse, with a frequency close to one of the energy storing and returning feet’s natural frequencies, could be applied, it can make the energy storing and returning foot susceptible to resonance, which, in the case of bending mode, if sustained can lead to a gain in height or increased velocity.

[1]  J G Buckley,et al.  Sprint kinematics of athletes with lower-limb amputations. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Ong Zhi Chao Analysis of Composite Prosthetic Energy-Storing- and- Returning (ESR) feet: A comparison between FEA and the experimental analysis , 2012 .

[3]  S. Camporesi,et al.  Oscar Pistorius, enhancement and post-humans , 2008, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[4]  R. Marshall,et al.  Relationships between ground reaction force impulse and kinematics of sprint-running acceleration. , 2005, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[5]  Lee Nolan,et al.  Carbon fibre prostheses and running in amputees: a review. , 2008, Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[6]  Siamak Noroozi,et al.  Performance enhancement of bi-lateral lower-limb amputees in the latter phases of running events: an initial investigation , 2013 .

[7]  P. Weyand,et al.  Faster top running speeds are achieved with greater ground forces not more rapid leg movements. , 2000, Journal of applied physiology.

[8]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Transtibial energy-storage-and-return prosthetic devices: a review of energy concepts and a proposed nomenclature. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  Adamantios Arampatzis,et al.  Biomechanics of double transtibial amputee sprinting using dedicated sprinting prostheses , 2008 .

[10]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Considerations for development of sensing and monitoring tools to facilitate treatment and care of persons with lower-limb loss: a review. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  Dirk Lefeber,et al.  Prosthetic feet: State-of-the-art review and the importance of mimicking human ankle–foot biomechanics , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[12]  S. Noroozi,et al.  The fair use of lower-limb running prostheses: A Delphi study. , 2011, Adapted physical activity quarterly : APAQ.

[13]  S. Noroozi,et al.  The design of lower‐limb sports prostheses: fair inclusion in disability sport , 2010 .

[14]  Karl E. Zelik Comments on Point:Counterpoint: Artificial limbs do/do not make artificially fast running speeds possible , 2010 .

[15]  Hugh M Herr,et al.  Running-specific prostheses limit ground-force during sprinting , 2010, Biology Letters.

[16]  Siamak Noroozi,et al.  Modal analysis of composite prosthetic energy-storing-and-returning feet: an initial investigation , 2013 .