Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of Linear and Nonlinear Feature Extraction Methods in a Neuro-oncology Problem

The diagnostic classification of human brain tumours on the basis of magnetic resonance spectra is a non-trivial problem in which dimensionality reduction is almost mandatory. This may take the form of feature selection or feature extraction. In feature extraction using manifold learning models, multivariate data are described through a low-dimensional manifold embedded in data space. Similarities between points along this manifold are best expressed as geodesic distances or their approximations. These approximations can be computationally intensive, and several alternative software implementations have been recently compared in terms of computation times. The current brief paper extends this research to investigate the comparative ability of dimensionality-reduced data descriptions to accurately classify several types of human brain tumours. The results suggest that the way in which the underlying data manifold is constructed in nonlinear dimensionality reduction methods strongly influences the classification results.

[1]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[2]  Lluís A. Belanche Muñoz,et al.  Feature and model selection with discriminatory visualization for diagnostic classification of brain tumors , 2010, Neurocomputing.

[3]  Carles Arús,et al.  Automated classification of short echo time in in vivo 1H brain tumor spectra: A multicenter study , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Lluís A. Belanche Muñoz,et al.  Outlier exploration and diagnostic classification of a multi-centre 1H-MRS brain tumour database , 2009, Neurocomputing.

[5]  I. Hassan Embedded , 2005, The Cyber Security Handbook.

[6]  Alfredo Vellido,et al.  Semi-supervised geodesic Generative Topographic Mapping , 2010, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[7]  Paulo J. G. Lisboa,et al.  Neural Networks and Other Machine Learning Methods in Cancer Research , 2007, IWANN.

[8]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.

[9]  Raúl Cruz Barbosa,et al.  On Geodesic Distance Computation: An Experimental Study , 2011 .

[10]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  The effect of combining two echo times in automatic brain tumor classification by MRS , 2008, NMR in biomedicine.

[11]  Michel Verleysen,et al.  Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction , 2021, Computer Vision.

[12]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Fibonacci heaps and their uses in improved network optimization algorithms , 1984, JACM.

[13]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[14]  M. Julià-Sapé,et al.  A Multi-Centre, Web-Accessible and Quality Control-Checked Database of in vivo MR Spectra of Brain Tumour Patients , 2006, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[15]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Laplacian Eigenmaps for Dimensionality Reduction and Data Representation , 2003, Neural Computation.

[16]  Alberto Prieto,et al.  Computational and ambient intelligence , 2009, Neurocomputing.

[17]  Paulo J. G. Lisboa,et al.  Application notes: data mining in cancer research , 2010 .

[18]  Paulo J. G. Lisboa,et al.  Data Mining in Cancer Research [Application Notes] , 2010, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.