Image quality evaluation of dual-layer spectral detector CT of the chest and comparison with conventional CT imaging.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate image quality parameters of virtual mono-energetic (MonoE) and conventional (CR) imaging derived from a dual-layer spectral detector CT (DLCT) in oncological follow-up venous phase imaging of the chest and comparison with conventional multi-detector CT (CRMDCT) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 55 patients who had oncologic staging with conventional CT and DLCT of the chest in venous phase were included in this study. Established image quality parameters were derived from all datasets in defined thoracic landmarks. Attenuation, image noise, and signal-/contrast- to noise ratios (SNR, CNR) were compared between CRDLCT and MonoE as well as CRMDCT imaging. Two readers performed subjective image analysis. RESULTS CRMDCT showed significant lower attenuation values compared to CRDLCT and MonoE at 40-70keV (p≤0.05). Moreover, MonoE at 40-70keV revealed significantly higher attenuations values compared to CRDLCT (p<0.001). Noise was statistically lower in CRMDCT compared with CRDLCT and MonoE at 40keV (11.4±2.3 HU vs. 12.0±3.1 HU vs. 11.7±5.2 HU; p<0.001). In contrast, all MonoE levels showed significantly lower noise levels compared to CRDLCT (p<0.001). SNR was not significantly different between CRMDCT and CRDLCT (13.5±3.7 vs. 14.4±5.3; p>0.99). SNR values were significantly increased for MonoE at 40-80keV compared to CRMDCT and CRDLCT (p<0.001). CRDLCT and MonoE (40-70keV) from DLCT revealed significantly higher CNR values than CRMDCT (p<0.001). In subjective analysis, MonoE at 40keV surpassed all other image reconstructions except for noise in MonoE at 70 keV. CONCLUSION In dual-layer spectral detector CT, MonoE at low keV showed superior image quality compared to conventional images derived from the same system and may therefore be added to clinical routine imaging protocols. Whether MonoE reconstructions yield additional diagnostic information is still unknown.

[1]  D N Slatkin,et al.  Single-and dual-energy CT with monochromatic synchrotron x-rays. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  L Desbiolles,et al.  Advanced virtual monoenergetic images: improving the contrast of dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography. , 2015, Clinical radiology.

[3]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Optimization of keV-settings in abdominal and lower extremity dual-source dual-energy CT angiography determined with virtual monoenergetic imaging. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[4]  C. McCollough,et al.  Dual- and Multi-Energy CT: Principles, Technical Approaches, and Clinical Applications. , 2015, Radiology.

[5]  Thomas Koehler,et al.  Acceleration of ML iterative algorithms for CT by the use of fast start images , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[6]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[7]  D. Sahani,et al.  Virtual monochromatic reconstruction of dual-energy unenhanced head CT at 65-75 keV maximizes image quality compared with conventional polychromatic CT. , 2013, Radiology.

[8]  W. Kalender,et al.  An algorithm for noise suppression in dual energy CT material density images. , 1988, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[9]  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer,et al.  Differentiation of Urinary Calculi With Dual Energy CT: Effect of Spectral Shaping by High Energy Tin Filtration , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[10]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation , 2011, European Radiology.

[11]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Value of monoenergetic low-kV dual energy CT datasets for improved image quality of CT pulmonary angiography. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[12]  K. Nikolaou,et al.  Effect of Noise-Optimized Monoenergetic Postprocessing on Diagnostic Accuracy for Detecting Incidental Pulmonary Embolism in Portal-Venous Phase Dual-Energy Computed Tomography , 2016, Investigative radiology.

[13]  Thomas Henzler,et al.  Optimization of kiloelectron volt settings in cerebral and cervical dual-energy CT angiography determined with virtual monoenergetic imaging. , 2014, Academic radiology.

[14]  Joon Koo Han,et al.  Assessment of a Model-Based, Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm (MBIR) Regarding Image Quality and Dose Reduction in Liver Computed Tomography , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[15]  Alvin C. Silva,et al.  Dual-energy (spectral) CT: applications in abdominal imaging. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[16]  D. Sahani,et al.  Material Separation Using Dual-Energy CT: Current and Emerging Applications. , 2016, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[17]  Jan-Erik Scholtz,et al.  Advanced image-based virtual monoenergetic dual-energy CT angiography of the abdomen: optimization of kiloelectron volt settings to improve image contrast , 2016, European Radiology.

[18]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Dual-energy CT-based monochromatic imaging. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Jan-Erik Scholtz,et al.  Comprehensive Comparison of Virtual Monoenergetic and Linearly Blended Reconstruction Techniques in Third-Generation Dual-Source Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Angiography of the Thorax and Abdomen , 2016, Investigative radiology.

[20]  A. Macovski,et al.  Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerised tomography , 1976, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .