Everyday use of the computer mouse extends peripersonal space representation

Auditory and tactile stimuli are integrated within a limited space around the body to form an auditory peripersonal space (APPS). Here we investigate whether the APPS representation around the hand can be extended through the use of a common technological tool such as the computer mouse. When using a mouse, an action occurring in the space around the hand has a distal effect in the space defined by the computer screen; thus, the mouse virtually links near and far space. Does prolonged experience with the mouse durably extend APPS representation to the far space? We examined 16 habitual mouse users to determine whether a sound presented near the right hand or near the computer screen affected reaction times to a tactile target at the hand. When subjects sat in front of the computer, without holding the mouse, they responded faster to tactile stimuli when sounds were presented near the hand rather than near the screen, consistent with a normal segregation of APPS around the hand. In contrast, when subjects either actively used or even passively held the mouse, the difference between the effects of near and far sounds disappeared, thus showing an extension of the APPS toward the far space. This effect was selective for the effector used to operate the mouse: if tactile stimuli were presented on the left hand, rarely used to act upon the mouse, a sound presented near the hand speeded up reactions times when subjects both held and did not hold the mouse in their left hand.

[1]  Elisabetta Làdavas,et al.  Seeing where your hands are , 1997, Nature.

[2]  A. Berti,et al.  When Far Becomes Near: Remapping of Space by Tool Use , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[4]  S. Sterbing-D’Angelo,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Multisensory Space Representations in the Macaque Ventral Intraparietal Area , 2022 .

[5]  Nicholas P. Holmes,et al.  Tool-Use: Capturing Multisensory Spatial Attention or Extending Multisensory Peripersonal Space? , 2007, Cortex.

[6]  C. Spence,et al.  The Handbook of Multisensory Processing , 2004 .

[7]  K. Zilles,et al.  Polymodal Motion Processing in Posterior Parietal and Premotor Cortex A Human fMRI Study Strongly Implies Equivalencies between Humans and Monkeys , 2001, Neuron.

[8]  A Farnè,et al.  Dynamic size‐change of hand peripersonal space following tool use , 2000, Neuroreport.

[9]  Mauro Ursino,et al.  Neural bases of peri-hand space plasticity through tool-use: Insights from a combined computational–experimental approach , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Maurizio Ferrarin,et al.  Bisecting Lines with Different Tools in Right Brain Damaged Patients: The Role of Action Programming and Sensory Feedback in Modulating Spatial Remapping , 2007, Cortex.

[11]  Micah M. Murray,et al.  Auditory–somatosensory multisensory interactions in front and rear space , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  C. Gross,et al.  Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. , 1994, Science.

[13]  Elisabetta Ladavas amp Farne,et al.  Neuropsychological evidence for multimodal representations of space near specific body parts , 2004 .

[14]  E. Làdavas Functional and dynamic properties of visual peripersonal space , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Ming C. Lin,et al.  Haptic Rendering : Foundations, Algorithms, and Applications , 2008 .

[16]  Michael S. Beauchamp,et al.  Sound enhances touch perception , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Francesco Pavani,et al.  Grasping actions remap peripersonal space , 2009, Neuroreport.

[18]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: anatomic location and visual response properties. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  C. Spence,et al.  Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention , 2004 .

[21]  B. Röder,et al.  Action goal selection and motor planning can be dissociated by tool use , 2008, Cognition.

[22]  Andrea Serino,et al.  Action-dependent plasticity in peripersonal space representations , 2008, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[23]  A. Iriki,et al.  Acquisition and development of monkey tool-use: behavioral and kinematic analyses. , 2000, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[24]  C. E. Chapman,et al.  Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. I. Importance of stimulus location. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4). , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Andrea Serino,et al.  Dynamic Size-Change of Peri-Hand Space Following Tool-Use: Determinants and Spatial Characteristics Revealed Through Cross-Modal Extinction , 2007, Cortex.

[27]  A. Iriki,et al.  From Sticks To Coffee-Maker: Mastery of Tools and Technology by Human and Non-Human Primates , 2007, Cortex.

[28]  C. Gross,et al.  A neuronal representation of the location of nearby sounds , 1999, Nature.

[29]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Spatial attention affects the processing of tactile and visual stimuli presented at the tip of a tool: an event-related potential study , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  A. Farnè,et al.  Visuo-tactile representation of near-the-body space , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[31]  A. Maravita,et al.  Tools for the body (schema) , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  Atsushi Iriki,et al.  Shaping multisensory action–space with tools: evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  C. Spence,et al.  Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools? Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[35]  C. Spence,et al.  Beyond the body schema: Visual, prosthetic, and technological contributions to bodily perception and awareness , 2006 .

[36]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Human Body Perception From The Inside Out , 2005 .

[37]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses , 1981, Behavioural Brain Research.

[38]  A. Farnè,et al.  Multisensory representation of peripersonal space , 2006 .

[39]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Grabbing your ear: rapid auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions in low-level sensory cortices are not constrained by stimulus alignment. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  The Space Around Us , 1997, Science.

[41]  Mauro Ursino,et al.  Crossmodal Links between Vision and Touch in Spatial Attention: A Computational Modelling Study , 2009, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[42]  Dylan F. Cooke,et al.  Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  C. Gross,et al.  Visuospatial properties of ventral premotor cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  Alessandro Farnè,et al.  Auditory peripersonal space in humans. , 2002, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[45]  Jon Driver,et al.  Reaching with a tool extends visual–tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  M. Bassolino,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Extended Multisensory Space in Blind Cane Users , 2022 .