Reclaiming Virtue Ethics for Economics

contrast, virtue ethics —the study of moral character—has been an important strand in moral philosophy for literally thousands of years, but has received little strand in moral philosophy for literally thousands of years, but has received little attention from contemporary economists. That neglect has not been reciprocated. attention from contemporary economists. That neglect has not been reciprocated. A signifi cant body of philosophical work in virtue ethics is associated with a radical A signifi cant body of philosophical work in virtue ethics is associated with a radical critique of the market economy and of economics. Expressed crudely, the charge critique of the market economy and of economics. Expressed crudely, the charge sheet is this: The market depends on instrumental rationality and extrinsic motisheet is this: The market depends on instrumental rationality and extrinsic motivation; market interactions therefore fail to respect the internal value of human vation; market interactions therefore fail to respect the internal value of human practices and the intrinsic motivations of human actors; by using market exchange practices and the intrinsic motivations of human actors; by using market exchange as its central model, economics normalizes extrinsic motivation, not only in markets as its central model, economics normalizes extrinsic motivation, not only in markets but also (in its ventures into the territories of other social sciences) in social life but also (in its ventures into the territories of other social sciences) in social life more generally; therefore economics is complicit in an assault on virtue and on more generally; therefore economics is complicit in an assault on virtue and on human fl ourishing. We will argue that this critique is fl awed, both as a descriphuman fl ourishing. We will argue that this critique is fl awed, both as a description of how markets actually work and as a representation of how classical and tion of how markets actually work and as a representation of how classical and neo classical economists have understood the market. We will show how the market neo classical economists have understood the market. We will show how the market and economics can be defended against the critique from virtue ethics. and economics can be defended against the critique from virtue ethics. Crucially, our response to that critique will be constructed Crucially, our response to that critique will be constructed using the language and logic of virtue ethics. In this respect, it is fundamentally different from a response . In this respect, it is fundamentally different from a response that many economists would fi nd more natural—to point to the enormous benefi ts, that many economists would fi nd more natural—to point to the enormous benefi ts,

[1]  J. Larson,et al.  An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations , 2015 .

[2]  Joseph Harrington The Spirit of the Laws , 2015 .

[3]  Iwao Hirose,et al.  Arrow, Kenneth J. , 2014 .

[4]  J. A. Montanye,et al.  What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets , 2013 .

[5]  T. Besley What's the Good of the Market? An Essay on Michael Sandel's What Money Can't Buy , 2013 .

[6]  Andrea Radasanu Montesquieu, Charles‐Louis de Secondat, Baron de , 2013 .

[7]  R. Sugden The market as a cooperative endeavour , 2012 .

[8]  U. Gneezy,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 25, Number 4—Fall 2011—Pages 191–210 When and Why Incentives (Don’t) Work to Modify Behavior , 2022 .

[9]  Frederic L. Pryor Capitalism and freedom , 2010 .

[10]  A. Kahan Mind vs. Money: The War Between Intellectuals and Capitalism , 2010 .

[11]  I. Staveren Communitarianism and the market: a paradox , 2009 .

[12]  R. Sugden,et al.  FRATERNITY: WHY THE MARKET NEED NOT BE A MORALLY FREE ZONE* , 2008, Economics and Philosophy.

[13]  M. Shermer Free to choose. , 2007, Scientific American.

[14]  A. Heyes The economics of vocation or 'why is a badly paid nurse a good nurse'? , 2005, Journal of health economics.

[15]  R. L. Trader Edgeworth, Francis Ysidro , 2004 .

[16]  Robert Sugden,et al.  Living with unfairness: The limits of equal opportunity in a market economy , 2004, Soc. Choice Welf..

[17]  J. Nelson,et al.  For Love or Money--Or Both? , 2000 .

[18]  A. Rustichini,et al.  Pay Enough or Don't Pay at All , 2000 .

[19]  R. Sugden,et al.  Moral canals: trust and social capital in the work of Hume, Smith and Genovesi , 2000, Economics and Philosophy.

[20]  A. Rustichini,et al.  A Fine is a Price , 2000, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[21]  B. Frey Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation , 1998 .

[22]  Femida Handy,et al.  The Wage Differential between Nonprofit Institutions and Corporations: Getting More by Paying Less? , 1998 .

[23]  Richard M. Titmuss,et al.  The gift relationship , 1970 .

[24]  Paul Weirich,et al.  Value in Ethics and Economics , 1995 .

[25]  Bruno S. Frey,et al.  How Intrinsic Motivation is Crowded out and in , 1994 .

[26]  Elizabeth Anderson,et al.  Value in Ethics and Economics , 1996 .

[27]  G. Scofield,et al.  The calculus of consent. , 1990, The Hastings Center report.

[28]  K. Arrow,et al.  Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, Vol. 5: Production and Capital. , 1986 .

[29]  K. Arrow Gifts and Exchanges , 1982 .

[30]  George A. Akerlof Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange , 1982 .

[31]  A. Hirschman,et al.  The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph , 1977 .

[32]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[33]  Richard M. Titmuss,et al.  Anderson-Titmuss debate over The Gift Relationship: from Human Blood to Social Policy. , 1971, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[34]  F. Widmann,et al.  The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy , 1971 .

[35]  W. Jevons Theory of Political Economy , 1965 .

[36]  F. Hayek Individualism and Economic Order , 1949 .

[37]  Howard Coonley,et al.  Making democracy work , 1941, Electrical Engineering.

[38]  D. Ricardo On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation , 1891 .

[39]  Michael J. Sandel Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? , 2009 .

[40]  Tom Tolin The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce , 2008 .

[41]  J. Nelson Economics and Social Interaction: Interpersonal relations and economics: comments from a feminist perspective , 2005 .

[42]  Harro Maas,et al.  Jevons, William Stanley , 2005 .

[43]  T. Millon,et al.  Personality and social psychology , 2003 .

[44]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[45]  B. Frey Not Just for the Money , 1997 .

[46]  G. Brennan The Theory of Institutional Design: Selection and the Currency of Reward , 1996 .

[47]  Michael J. Sandel,et al.  What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Academic Medicine , 2012 .

[48]  D. Hume,et al.  Of the jealousy of trade , 1994 .

[49]  Kenneth J. Arrow,et al.  Social Choice and Justice , 1984 .

[50]  Jane Cauvel After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory , 1982 .

[51]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Hidden costs of reward : new perspectives on the psychology of human motivation , 1978 .

[52]  Friedrich A. von Hayek,et al.  Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 2: The Mirage of Social Justice , 1977 .

[53]  D. Raphael,et al.  I: The Theory of Moral Sentiments , 1976 .

[54]  E. Deci Effects of Externally Mediated Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation. , 1971 .

[55]  Adam Smith,et al.  Lectures on Jurisprudence , 1963 .

[56]  James M. Buchanan and Gordon Tullock The Calculus of Consent , 1962 .

[57]  J. Mill Principles of Political Economy (III): Exchange , 1848 .

[58]  J. Mill Principles of Political Economy (I): Production , 1848 .