Electrifying diagrams for learning: principles for complex representational systems

Six characteristics of effective representational systems for conceptual learning in complex domains have been identified. Such representations should: (1) integrate levels of abstraction; (2) combine globally homogeneous with locally heterogeneous representation of concepts; (3) integrate alternative perspectives of the domain; (4) support malleable manipulation of expressions; (5) possess compact procedures; and (6) have uniform procedures. The characteristics were discovered by analysing and evaluating a novel diagrammatic representation that has been invented to support students' comprehension of electricity-AVOW diagrams (Amps, Volts, Ohms, Watts). A task analysis is presented that demonstrates that problem solving using a conventional algebraic approach demands more effort than AVOW diagrams. In an experiment comparing two groups of learners using the alternative approaches, the group using AVOW diagrams learned more than the group using equations and were better able to solve complex transfer problems and questions involving multiple constraints. Analysis of verbal protocols and work scratchings showed that the AVOW diagram group, in contrast to the equations group, acquired a coherently organised network of concepts, learnt effective problem solving procedures, and experienced more positive learning events. The six principles of effective representations were proposed on the basis of these findings. AVOW diagrams are Law Encoding Diagrams, a general class of representations that have been shown to support learning in other scientific domains.

[1]  Priti Shah,et al.  A Model of the Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Graph Comprehension , 1998 .

[2]  David Shipstone,et al.  Electric circuits: a ne w approach - part 1 , 2001 .

[3]  Jon Oberlander,et al.  A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: logic and implementation. Cognitive Science , 1995 .

[4]  Peter C.-H. Cheng Interactive Law Encoding Diagrams for learning and instruction , 1999 .

[5]  Peter C-H A Framework for Scientific Reasoning with Law Encoding Diagrams: Analysing Protocols to Assess Its Utility , 1998 .

[6]  H. Simon,et al.  Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Peter C.-H. Cheng Networks of law encoding diagrams for understanding science , 1999 .

[8]  Hermina J. M. Tabachneck-Schijf,et al.  CaMeRa: A Computational Model of Multiple Representations , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  Fernand Gobet,et al.  CHREST+: A simulation of how humans learn to solve problems using diagrams , 2000 .

[10]  H. Simon,et al.  Expert chess memory: revisiting the chunking hypothesis. , 1998, Memory.

[11]  Peter C.-H. Cheng,et al.  Supporting learning and promoting conceptual change with box and AVOW diagrams. Part 2: Their impact on student learning at A-level , 2003 .

[12]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  The creative cognition approach. , 1995 .

[14]  Peter C.-H. Cheng,et al.  Unlocking conceptual learning in mathematics and science with effective representational systems , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[15]  B. Eylon,et al.  Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of students’ concepts , 1983 .

[16]  Peter C.-H. Cheng,et al.  Supporting learning and promoting conceptual change with box and AVOW diagrams. Part 1: Representational design and instructional approaches , 2003 .

[17]  Albert Weale,et al.  Forms of Representation , 1999 .

[18]  Fernand Gobet,et al.  Learning perceptual schemas to avoid the utility problem , 1999 .

[19]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Abstract Planning and Perceptual Chunks: Elements of Expertise in Geometry , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[20]  Peter C.-H. Cheng Law encoding diagrams for instructional systems , 1996 .

[21]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  Representations in Distributed Cognitive Tasks , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  Peter I. Cowling,et al.  Opening the Information Bottleneck in Complex Scheduling Problems with a Novel Representation: STARK Diagrams , 2002, Diagrams.

[23]  R McGill,et al.  Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific Data , 1985, Science.

[24]  Peter C.-H. Cheng,et al.  Electric circuits: A new approach - part 2 , 2002 .

[25]  Fernand Gobet,et al.  CHREST + : Investigating How Humans Learn to Solve Problems Using Diagrams , 2000 .

[26]  M. Frixione,et al.  Diagrammatic Reasoning , 2001 .

[27]  Frans Coenen,et al.  Research and development in intelligent systems XVI : proceedings of ES99, the nineteenth SGES International Conference on Knowledge-Based Systems and Applied Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, December 1999 , 2000 .

[28]  Nigel G. Pitt,et al.  Diagrams for difficult problems in probability , 2003, The Mathematical Gazette.

[29]  S. Kosslyn Understanding charts and graphs , 1989 .

[30]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity , 1992 .

[31]  M. Chi,et al.  The Nature of Expertise , 1988 .

[32]  Peter C.-H. Cheng Scientific Discovery With Law-Encoding Diagrams , 1996 .

[33]  Jim Breithaupt,et al.  A-level Physics , 1992 .

[34]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY AND CREATIVE REASONING WITH DIAGRAMS , 2003 .

[35]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[36]  Peter C.-H. Cheng,et al.  AVOW Diagrams: A Novel Representational System for Understanding Electricity , 2002, Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning.

[37]  Steven Pinker,et al.  A theory of graph comprehension. , 1990 .

[38]  Peter C-H. Cheng REPRESENTATIONAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN : WHAT MAKES AN EFFECTIVE REPRESENTATION FOR LEARNING PROBABILITY THEORY ? , 2002 .

[39]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  The Nature of External Representations in Problem Solving , 1997, Cogn. Sci..