A design‐variable‐based inelastic hysteretic model for beam–column connections

This paper presents a design-variable-based inelastic hysteretic model for beam-column connections. It has been well known that the load-carrying capacity of connections heavily depends on the types and design variables even in the same connection type. Although many hysteretic connection models have been proposed, most of them are dependent on the specific connection type with presumed failure mechanisms. The proposed model can be responsive to variations both in design choices and in loading conditions. The proposed model consists of two modules: physical-principle-based module and neural network (NN)-based module in which information flow from design space to response space is formulated in one complete model. Moreover, owing to robust learning capability of a new NN-based module, the model can also learn complex dynamic evolutions in response space under earthquake loading conditions, such as yielding, post-buckling and tearing, etc. Performance of the proposed model has been demonstrated with synthetic and experimental data of two connection types: extended-end-plate and top- and seat-angle with double-web-angle connection. Furthermore, the design-variable-based model can be customized to any structural component beyond the application to beam-column connections.

[1]  George Cybenko,et al.  Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1992, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[2]  Atorod Azizinamini,et al.  Static and Cyclic Performance of Semirigid Steel Beam‐to‐Column Connections , 1989 .

[3]  Wai-Fah Chen,et al.  Analysis and behaviour of flexibly-jointed frames , 1986 .

[4]  Sherief S.S. Sakla Neural network modeling of the load-carrying capacity of eccentrically-loaded single-angle struts , 2004 .

[5]  Martin A. Riedmiller,et al.  A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: the RPROP algorithm , 1993, IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks.

[6]  Faris Albermani,et al.  Cyclic and seismic response of flexibly jointed frames , 1994 .

[7]  Ralph M. Richard,et al.  Versatile Elastic-Plastic Stress-Strain Formula , 1975 .

[8]  Tae-Sup Moon,et al.  Momentrotation model of semi-rigid connections with angles , 2002 .

[9]  Georgios E. Stavroulakis,et al.  A Backpropagation Neural Network Model for Semi-rigid Steel Connections , 1995 .

[10]  Mingfu Michael Zhang Neural Network Material Models Determined From Structural Tests , 1997 .

[11]  M. John Frye,et al.  Analysis of Flexibly Connected Steel Frames , 1975 .

[12]  N. Kishi,et al.  Moment‐Rotation Relations of Semirigid Connections with Angles , 1990 .

[13]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Modeling of Hysteretic Behavior of Beam -Column Connections Based on Self -Learning Simulation , 2006 .

[14]  Kim Seung-Eock,et al.  Advanced Analysis of Steel Frames , 1996 .

[15]  E. L. Hines,et al.  Application of artificial neural networks to the prediction of minor axis steel connections , 1997 .

[16]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  A new neural network‐based model for hysteretic behavior of materials , 2008 .

[17]  K M Abdala,et al.  BACKPROPAGATION NEURAL NETWORK MODEL FOR SEMI-RIGID JOINTS , 1995 .