Assessing the CAM5 physics suite in the WRF-Chem model: implementation, resolution sensitivity, and a first evaluation for a regional case study

Abstract. A suite of physical parameterizations (deep and shallow convection, turbulent boundary layer, aerosols, cloud microphysics, and cloud fraction) from the global climate model Community Atmosphere Model version 5.1 (CAM5) has been implemented in the regional model Weather Research and Forecasting with chemistry (WRF-Chem). A downscaling modeling framework with consistent physics has also been established in which both global and regional simulations use the same emissions and surface fluxes. The WRF-Chem model with the CAM5 physics suite is run at multiple horizontal resolutions over a domain encompassing the northern Pacific Ocean, northeast Asia, and northwest North America for April 2008 when the ARCTAS, ARCPAC, and ISDAC field campaigns took place. These simulations are evaluated against field campaign measurements, satellite retrievals, and ground-based observations, and are compared with simulations that use a set of common WRF-Chem parameterizations. This manuscript describes the implementation of the CAM5 physics suite in WRF-Chem, provides an overview of the modeling framework and an initial evaluation of the simulated meteorology, clouds, and aerosols, and quantifies the resolution dependence of the cloud and aerosol parameterizations. We demonstrate that some of the CAM5 biases, such as high estimates of cloud susceptibility to aerosols and the underestimation of aerosol concentrations in the Arctic, can be reduced simply by increasing horizontal resolution. We also show that the CAM5 physics suite performs similarly to a set of parameterizations commonly used in WRF-Chem, but produces higher ice and liquid water condensate amounts and near-surface black carbon concentration. Further evaluations that use other mesoscale model parameterizations and perform other case studies are needed to infer whether one parameterization consistently produces results more consistent with observations.

[1]  Sungsu Park,et al.  Integrating Cloud Processes in the Community Atmosphere Model, Version 5 , 2014 .

[2]  Kaarle Kupiainen,et al.  Black carbon in the Arctic: the underestimated role of gas flaring and residential combustion emissions , 2013 .

[3]  W. Collins,et al.  The Community Earth System Model: A Framework for Collaborative Research , 2013 .

[4]  P. Rasch,et al.  The Separate Physics and Dynamics Experiment (SPADE) framework for determining resolution awareness: A case study of microphysics , 2013 .

[5]  R. Blender,et al.  Precipitation Extremes in CMIP5 Simulations on Different Time Scales , 2013 .

[6]  S. Ghan,et al.  Sensitivity of remote aerosol distributions to representation of cloud–aerosol interactions in a global climate model , 2013 .

[7]  J. Gattiker,et al.  A novel approach for determining source–receptor relationships in model simulations: a case study of black carbon transport in northern hemisphere winter , 2013 .

[8]  J. Lamarque,et al.  The role of circulation features on black carbon transport into the Arctic in the Community Atmosphere Model version 5 (CAM5) , 2013 .

[9]  J. Chiang,et al.  Increase in the range between wet and dry season precipitation , 2013 .

[10]  D. Williamson.  The effect of time steps and time‐scales on parametrization suites , 2013 .

[11]  T. Matsui,et al.  Direct Radiative Effect of Mineral Dust on the Development of African Easterly Waves in Late Summer, 2003–07 , 2012 .

[12]  S. Ghan,et al.  Constraining the influence of natural variability to improve estimates of global aerosol indirect effects in a nudged version of the Community Atmosphere Model 5 , 2012 .

[13]  S. Ghan,et al.  Impact of natural and anthropogenic aerosols on stratocumulus and precipitation in the Southeast Pacific: a regional modelling study using WRF-Chem , 2012 .

[14]  P. Rasch,et al.  Fast and slow responses of the South Asian monsoon system to anthropogenic aerosols , 2012 .

[15]  Todd D. Ringler,et al.  A Multiscale Nonhydrostatic Atmospheric Model Using Centroidal Voronoi Tesselations and C-Grid Staggering , 2012 .

[16]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Evaluation of preindustrial to present-day black carbon and its albedo forcing from Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) , 2012 .

[17]  Mengistu Wolde,et al.  The dependence of ice microphysics on aerosol concentration in arctic mixed‐phase stratus clouds during ISDAC and M‐PACE , 2012 .

[18]  D. Fahey,et al.  Scales of variability of black carbon plumes over the Pacific Ocean , 2012 .

[19]  R. Marchand,et al.  Constraining cloud lifetime effects of aerosols using A‐Train satellite observations , 2012 .

[20]  P. Rasch,et al.  Climate response of the South Asian monsoon system to anthropogenic aerosols , 2012 .

[21]  W. G. Strand,et al.  Climate System Response to External Forcings and Climate Change Projections in CCSM4 , 2012 .

[22]  Potential impacts of Asian carbon aerosols on future US warming , 2012 .

[23]  David D. Turner,et al.  Toward understanding of differences in current cloud retrievals of ARM ground‐based measurements , 2012 .

[24]  Richard Neale,et al.  Toward a Minimal Representation of Aerosols in Climate Models: Description and Evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5 , 2012 .

[25]  Adam S. Phillips,et al.  ENSO and Pacific Decadal Variability in the Community Climate System Model Version 4 , 2012 .

[26]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  Toward a Minimal Representation of Aerosols in Climate Models: Comparative Decomposition of Aerosol Direct, Semidirect, and Indirect Radiative Forcing , 2012 .

[27]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[28]  J. Lamarque,et al.  CAM-chem: description and evaluation of interactive atmospheric chemistry in the Community Earth System Model , 2012 .

[29]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  The Evolution of Climate Sensitivity and Climate Feedbacks in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2012 .

[30]  Qiaoqiao Wang,et al.  Sources of carbonaceous aerosols and deposited black carbon in the Arctic in winter-spring: implications for radiative forcing , 2011 .

[31]  A. Weinheimer,et al.  Effects of aging on organic aerosol from open biomass burning smoke in aircraft and laboratory studies , 2011 .

[32]  Chun‐Chieh Wu,et al.  The Impact of a Warm Ocean Eddy on Typhoon Morakot (2009): A Preliminary Study from Satellite Observations and Numerical Modelling , 2011 .

[33]  Chun‐Chieh Wu,et al.  Monsoonal Influence on Typhoon Morakot (2009). Part II: Numerical Study , 2011 .

[34]  Peter R. Gent,et al.  Response to Increasing Southern Hemisphere Winds in CCSM4 , 2011 .

[35]  G. Feingold,et al.  The scale problem in quantifying aerosol indirect effects , 2011 .

[36]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Evolution of anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of air pollutants at global and regional scales during the 1980–2010 period , 2011 .

[37]  J. Jimenez,et al.  Absorbing aerosol in the troposphere of the Western Arctic during the 2008 ARCTAS/ARCPAC airborne field campaigns , 2011 .

[38]  Y. Qian,et al.  Downscaling aerosols and the impact of neglected subgrid processes on direct aerosol radiative forcing for a representative global climate model grid spacing , 2011 .

[39]  E. Kassianov,et al.  Aerosol indirect effects in a multi-scale aerosol-climate model PNNL-MMF , 2011 .

[40]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[41]  K. Taylor,et al.  The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2011 .

[42]  G. Grell,et al.  The Aerosol Modeling Testbed: A Community Tool to Objectively Evaluate Aerosol Process Modules , 2011 .

[43]  Mengistu Wolde,et al.  Indirect and semi-direct aerosol campaign: The impact of Arctic aerosols on clouds , 2011 .

[44]  S. Ghan,et al.  Representation of Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds and the Wegener-Bergeron- Findeisen Process in Climate Models: Perspectives from a Cloud-Resolving Study , 2011 .

[45]  W. Collins,et al.  Impact of horizontal resolution on simulation of precipitation extremes in an aqua-planet version of Community Atmospheric Model (CAM3) , 2011 .

[46]  G. Feingold,et al.  The scale problem in quantifying aerosol indirect , 2011 .

[47]  S. K. Akagi,et al.  The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN): a high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning , 2010 .

[48]  P. Pilewskie,et al.  Characteristics, sources, and transport of aerosols measured in spring 2008 during the aerosol, radiation, and cloud processes affecting Arctic Climate (ARCPAC) Project , 2010 .

[49]  J. Peischl,et al.  Aircraft observations of enhancement and depletion of black carbon mass in the springtime Arctic , 2010 .

[50]  J. Barnard,et al.  Technical Note: Evaluation of the WRF-Chem "aerosol chemical to aerosol optical properties" module using data from the MILAGRO campaign , 2010 .

[51]  Y. Qian,et al.  An investigation of the sub-grid variability of trace gases and aerosols for global climate modeling , 2010 .

[52]  Glenn E. Shaw,et al.  The Arctic Research of the Composition of the Troposphere from Aircraft and Satellites (ARCTAS) mission: design, execution, and first results , 2010 .

[53]  I. Simmonds,et al.  The central role of diminishing sea ice in recent Arctic temperature amplification , 2010, Nature.

[54]  Jacques Pelon,et al.  Airborne measurements of aerosol optical properties related to early spring transport of mid-latitude sources into the Arctic , 2009 .

[55]  M. Chin,et al.  Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models , 2009 .

[56]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Aerosol indirect effects – general circulation model intercomparison and evaluation with satellite data , 2009 .

[57]  Hailong Wang,et al.  Modeling Mesoscale Cellular Structures and Drizzle in Marine Stratocumulus. Part I: Impact of Drizzle on the Formation and Evolution of Open Cells , 2009 .

[58]  Hailong Wang,et al.  Modeling Mesoscale Cellular Structures and Drizzle in Marine Stratocumulus. Part II: The Microphysics and Dynamics of the Boundary Region between Open and Closed Cells , 2009 .

[59]  H. Fuelberg,et al.  A meteorological overview of the ARCTAS 2008 mission , 2009 .

[60]  L. Horowitz,et al.  Evaluating inter-continental transport of fine aerosols: (1) Methodology, global aerosol distribution and optical depth , 2009 .

[61]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Description and evaluation of the Model for Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4) , 2009 .

[62]  C. Bretherton,et al.  The University of Washington Shallow Convection and Moist Turbulence Schemes and Their Impact on Climate Simulations with the Community Atmosphere Model , 2009 .

[63]  C. Bretherton,et al.  A New Moist Turbulence Parameterization in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2009 .

[64]  G. Thompson,et al.  Impact of Cloud Microphysics on the Development of Trailing Stratiform Precipitation in a Simulated Squall Line: Comparison of One- and Two-Moment Schemes , 2009 .

[65]  Ulrike Lohmann,et al.  Sensitivity of the total anthropogenic aerosol effect to the treatment of rain in a global climate model , 2009 .

[66]  R. Neale,et al.  The Impact of Convection on ENSO: From a Delayed Oscillator to a Series of Events , 2008 .

[67]  J. Haywood,et al.  Prediction of visibility and aerosol within the operational Met Office Unified Model. II: Validation of model performance using observational data , 2008 .

[68]  Mian Chin,et al.  A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic , 2008 .

[69]  R. Laprise,et al.  Challenging some tenets of Regional Climate Modelling , 2008 .

[70]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: Description and numerical tests , 2008 .

[71]  S. Ghan,et al.  A New Two-Moment Bulk Stratiform Cloud Microphysics Scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, Version 3 (CAM3). Part II: Single-Column and Global Results , 2008 .

[72]  M. Holland,et al.  The emergence of surface-based Arctic amplification , 2008 .

[73]  Jerome D. Fast,et al.  Model for Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC) , 2008 .

[74]  W. Collins,et al.  Radiative forcing by long‐lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models , 2008 .

[75]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  Effects of Convective Momentum Transport on the Atmospheric Circulation in the Community Atmosphere Model, Version 3 , 2008 .

[76]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon , 2008 .

[77]  G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 , 2008 .

[78]  J. Lerner,et al.  Effects of resolution and model physics on tracer transports in the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies general circulation models , 2007 .

[79]  A. Stohl,et al.  Arctic Air Pollution: Origins and Impacts , 2007, Science.

[80]  P. Quinn,et al.  Arctic haze: current trends and knowledge gaps , 2007 .

[81]  Ying-Hwa Kuo,et al.  Research Needs and Directions of Regional Climate Modeling Using WRF and CCSM , 2006 .

[82]  G. Grell,et al.  Evolution of ozone, particulates, and aerosol direct radiative forcing in the vicinity of Houston using a fully coupled meteorology‐chemistry‐aerosol model , 2006 .

[83]  Tami C. Bond,et al.  Emissions of primary aerosol and precursor gases in the years 2000 and 1750 prescribed data-sets for AeroCom , 2006 .

[84]  Steven J. Ghan,et al.  Impact of cloud-borne aerosol representation on aerosol direct and indirect effects , 2006 .

[85]  Luis Kornblueh,et al.  Sensitivity of Simulated Climate to Horizontal and Vertical Resolution in the ECHAM5 Atmosphere Model , 2006 .

[86]  L. Barrie,et al.  Variations and sources of the equivalent black carbon in the high Arctic revealed by long‐term observations at Alert and Barrow: 1989–2003 , 2006 .

[87]  Jianping Pan,et al.  Regional climate model downscaling of the U.S. summer climate and future change , 2006 .

[88]  Axel Lauer,et al.  © Author(s) 2006. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles , 2022 .

[89]  S. Ghan,et al.  Parallel simulations of aerosol influence on clouds using cloud‐resolving and single‐column models , 2005 .

[90]  A. Lynch,et al.  Estimating the Uncertainty in a Regional Climate Model Related to Initial and Lateral Boundary Conditions , 2005 .

[91]  G. Meehl,et al.  OVERVIEW OF THE COUPLED MODEL INTERCOMPARISON PROJECT , 2005 .

[92]  SCALE SELECTIVE BIAS CORRECTION IN A DOWNSCALING OF GLOBAL ANALYSIS USING A REGIONAL MODEL , 2005 .

[93]  Georg A. Grell,et al.  Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model , 2005 .

[94]  Michael B. McElroy,et al.  A nested grid formulation for chemical transport over Asia: Applications to CO , 2004 .

[95]  D. Randall,et al.  Effects of model resolution and subgrid-scale physics on the simulation of precipitation in the continental United States , 2004 .

[96]  D. Streets,et al.  A technology‐based global inventory of black and organic carbon emissions from combustion , 2004 .

[97]  Xindi Bian,et al.  Mid-Century Ensemble Regional Climate Change Scenarios for the Western United States , 2004 .

[98]  Daniel Caya,et al.  Internal variability of RCM simulations over an annual cycle , 2004 .

[99]  W. Collins,et al.  Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM 3.0) , 2004 .

[100]  Y. Qian,et al.  The Sensitivity of Precipitation and Snowpack Simulations to Model Resolution via Nesting in Regions of Complex Terrain , 2003 .

[101]  Y. Qian,et al.  Hydroclimate of the Western United States Based on Observations and Regional Climate Simulation of 1981–2000. Part I: Seasonal Statistics , 2003 .

[102]  Y. Qian,et al.  Hydroclimate of the Western United States Based on Observations and Regional Climate Simulation of 1981–2000. Part II: Mesoscale ENSO Anomalies , 2003 .

[103]  David L. Williamson,et al.  Time-Split versus Process-Split Coupling of Parameterizations and Dynamical Core , 2002 .

[104]  Bin Wang,et al.  Intercomparison of the climatological variations of Asian summer monsoon precipitation simulated by 10 GCMs , 2002 .

[105]  G. Grell,et al.  A generalized approach to parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques , 2002 .

[106]  Kenneth E. Kunkel,et al.  Development of a Regional Climate Model for U.S. Midwest Applications. Part I: Sensitivity to Buffer Zone Treatment , 2001 .

[107]  M. Chin,et al.  Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the GOCART model , 2001 .

[108]  Leiming Zhang,et al.  A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module , 2001 .

[109]  Zaviša I. Janić.  Nonsingular implementation of the Mellor-Yamada level 2.5 scheme in the NCEP Meso model , 2001 .

[110]  F. Giorgi,et al.  A study of internal variability of a regional climate model , 2000 .

[111]  H. Storch,et al.  A Spectral Nudging Technique for Dynamical Downscaling Purposes , 2000 .

[112]  A. Illingworth,et al.  Toward More Accurate Retrievals of Ice Water Content from Radar Measurements of Clouds , 2000 .

[113]  S. Ghan,et al.  A parameterization of aerosol activation: 2. Multiple aerosol types , 2000 .

[114]  P. J. Rasch,et al.  A comparison of scavenging and deposition processes in global models: results from the WCRP Cambridge Workshop of 1995 , 2000 .

[115]  J. Dudhia,et al.  Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation and Sensitivity , 2001 .

[116]  Leonard K. Peters,et al.  A new lumped structure photochemical mechanism for large‐scale applications , 1999 .

[117]  Mark Lawrence,et al.  A model for studies of tropospheric photochemistry: Description, global distributions, and evaluation , 1999 .

[118]  S. Ghan,et al.  A Comparison of Three Different Modeling Strategies for Evaluating Cloud and Radiation Parameterizations , 1999 .

[119]  S. Ghan,et al.  Pacific Northwest Climate Sensitivity Simulated by a Regional Climate Model Driven by a GCM. Part I: Control Simulations , 1999 .

[120]  Song-You Hong,et al.  Implementation of Prognostic Cloud Scheme for a Regional Spectral Model , 1998 .

[121]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[122]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  A Comparison of the CCM3 Model Climate Using Diagnosed and Predicted Condensate Parameterizations , 1998 .

[123]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  Representations of transport, convection, and the hydrologic cycle in chemical transport models : Implications for the modeling of short-lived and soluble species , 1997 .

[124]  L. Ruby Leung,et al.  Prediction of cloud droplet number in a general , 1997 .

[125]  R. Oglesby,et al.  Effects of resolution and physics on precipitation in the NCAR Community Climate Model , 1997 .

[126]  E. Mlawer,et al.  Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave , 1997 .

[127]  Martyn P. Chipperfield,et al.  Evaluation and intercomparison of global atmospheric transport models using 222Rn and other short-lived tracers , 1997 .

[128]  F. Giorgi,et al.  A Investigation of the Sensitivity of Simulated Precipitation to Model Resolution and Its Implications for Climate Studies , 1996 .

[129]  K. Sassen,et al.  Investigation of relationships between Ka-band radar reflectivity and ice and liquid water contents , 1994 .

[130]  G. Mellor,et al.  Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems , 1982 .

[131]  R. Hill,et al.  Description and evaluation , 1976 .