Developing attributes for discrete choice experiments in health: a systematic literature review and case study of alcohol misuse interventions

Abstract Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) become increasingly popular to value outcomes for health economic studies and gradually gain acceptance as an input into policy decisions. Developing attributes is a key aspect for the design of DCEs, as their results may misguide decision-makers if they are based on an inappropriate set of attributes. However, the area lacks guidance, and current health-related DCE studies vary considerably in their methods of attribute development, with the consequent danger of providing an unreliable input for policy decisions. The aim of this article is to inform the progress toward a more systematic approach to attribute development for DCE studies in health. A systematic review of the published health-related DCE literature was conducted to lay the foundations for a generic framework which was tested in a case study of alcohol misuse interventions. Four stages of a general attribute development process emerged: (i) raw data collection; (ii) data reduction; (iii) removing inappropriate attributes; and (iv) wording. The case study compared and contrasted a qualitative and mixed-methods approach for the development of attributes for DCEs in the area of alcohol misuse interventions. This article provides a reference point for the design of future DCE experiments in health.

[1]  P. Burge,et al.  Do patients always prefer quicker treatment? : a discrete choice analysis of patients' stated preferences in the London Patient Choice Project. , 2004, Applied health economics and health policy.

[2]  S. Riedel-Heller,et al.  The role of monetary and nonmonetary incentives on the choice of practice establishment: a stated preference study of young physicians in Germany. , 2010, Health services research.

[3]  R. Epstein,et al.  Encouraging patients with depressive symptoms to seek care: a mixed methods approach to message development. , 2010, Patient education and counseling.

[4]  L. McKenzie,et al.  Symptom-based outcome measures for asthma: the use of discrete choice methods to assess patient preferences. , 2001, Health policy.

[5]  M Ryan,et al.  Assessing women's preferences for intrapartum care. , 2001, Birth.

[6]  Michel Champagne,et al.  To do or not to do. , 2007, International journal of orthodontics.

[7]  J. Ratcliffe,et al.  INVESTIGATING THE STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY OF A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT WITHIN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT , 2002, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[8]  S. Greenfield,et al.  Women's colposcopy experience and preferences: a mixed methods study , 2008, BMC women's health.

[9]  Rosalie Viney,et al.  Using stated preference discrete choice modelling to evaluate the introduction of varicella vaccination. , 2002, Health economics.

[10]  P. Shackley,et al.  Quantifying Patient Preferences for Out-of-Hours Primary Care , 2000, Journal of health services research & policy.

[11]  M. Ryan,et al.  Using discrete choice experiments in health economics: moving forward , 2003 .

[12]  J. Bond,et al.  Developing attributes for a generic quality of life measure for older people: preferences or capabilities? , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[13]  A. Dhar,et al.  National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence , 2005 .

[14]  X. Koolman,et al.  Preferences for long-term care services: willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[15]  I. Graham,et al.  Parents' Preferences for Services for Children with Hearing Loss: A Conjoint Analysis Study , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[16]  M. Ryan.  Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[17]  M. Halme,et al.  Patients’ Preferences for Generic and Branded Over-the-Counter Medicines , 2009, The patient.

[18]  Joanna Coast,et al.  Developing attributes and levels for discrete choice experiments using qualitative methods , 2007, Journal of health services research & policy.

[19]  Richard H Osborne,et al.  Designing choice experiments with many attributes. An application to setting priorities for orthopaedic waiting lists. , 2009, Health economics.

[20]  M Ryan,et al.  Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management. , 1997, Health economics.

[21]  Joanna Coast,et al.  Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations. , 2012, Health economics.

[22]  A. Scott,et al.  Identifying and analysing dominant preferences in discrete choice experiments: An application in health care , 2002 .

[23]  Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi,et al.  Making sense of patient priorities: applying discrete choice methods in primary care using 'think aloud' technique. , 2007, Family practice.

[24]  M. Ryan,et al.  Using Consumer Preferences in Health Care Decision Making: The Application of Conjoint Analysis , 1996 .

[25]  C. Dirksen,et al.  Discrete choice experiments for complex health-care decisions: does hierarchical information integration offer a solution? , 2009, Health economics.

[26]  Discrete choice experiment to derive willingness to pay for methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy versus simple excision surgery in basal cell carcinoma , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[27]  J. Louviere,et al.  Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[28]  J. Ratcliffe,et al.  PATIENTS' PREFERENCES REGARDING THE PROCESS AND OUTCOMES OF LIFE-SAVING TECHNOLOGY , 1999, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[29]  Barbara McPake,et al.  How to do (or not to do) ... Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. , 2009, Health policy and planning.

[30]  Emily Lancsar,et al.  Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future , 2009, Health Economics, Policy and Law.

[31]  Deborah Marshall,et al.  Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. , 2013, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[32]  M Espallargues,et al.  Wide Social Participation in Prioritizing Patients on Waiting Lists for Joint Replacement: A Conjoint Analysis , 2008, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[33]  M. Nussbaum,et al.  Book reviews , 2002 .

[34]  R. Baltussen,et al.  Criteria for priority setting of HIV/AIDS interventions in Thailand: a discrete choice experiment , 2010, BMC health services research.

[35]  J. Ratcliffe,et al.  Public preferences for the allocation of donor liver grafts for transplantation. , 2000, Health economics.

[36]  A. Culyer,et al.  Discrete Choice Experiments , 2014 .

[37]  C. Dirksen,et al.  Does the Inclusion of a Cost Attribute Result in Different Preferences for the Surgical Treatment of Primary Basal Cell Carcinoma? , 2010, PharmacoEconomics.

[38]  Andrew Lloyd,et al.  Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[39]  M. Hammersley.  Using qualitative methods , 1981 .

[40]  Mark Wardman,et al.  Establishing patient preferences for gastroenterology clinic reorganization using conjoint analysis , 2002, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[41]  Mandy Ryan,et al.  Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care , 2008 .