Who are we? The natural semantics of pronouns

Abstract Working within the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) framework of Anna Wierzbicka, this study proposes reductive paraphrase explications for a range of first-person pronominal meanings. A general explicatory schema is first developed for English we . It is then shown how this can be elaborated to accommodate the inclusive/exclusive distinction, dual number and trial number, and how it can be applied to minimal-augmented systems. Data is taken from various languages of Australia and Asia. It is argued that NSM explications are preferable to conventional feature analyses for two reasons: they are less subject to charges of arbitrariness and obscurity; and they are located within a comprehensive theory of semantic representation.

[1]  Anna Wierzbicka,et al.  Semantic and lexical universals : theory and empirical findings , 1994 .

[2]  James D. Benson,et al.  Linguistics in a systemic perspective , 1988 .

[3]  Z. Vendler.  Linguistics in Philosophy , 1967 .

[4]  Hilary Chappell,et al.  Inalienability and the personal domain in Mandarin Chinese discourse , 1996 .

[5]  Harold V. King,et al.  Word-classes in modern English , 1958 .

[6]  Graham R. McKay,et al.  Pronominal Person and Number Categories in Rembarrnga and Djeebbana , 1978 .

[7]  R. Harré.  Universals yet again: A test of the ‘Wierzbicka thesis’ , 1993 .

[8]  Hilary Chappell.  The Passive of Bodily Effect in Chinese , 1986 .

[9]  Fred W. Householder,et al.  Problems in Lexicography , 1967 .

[10]  John Lyons,et al.  Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics , 1971 .

[11]  Marianne Mithun,et al.  The grammaticalization of coordination , 1988 .

[12]  H. Chappell,et al.  Formal and colloquial adversity passives in standard Chinese , 1986 .

[13]  Adrienne Lehrer,et al.  Impersonal uses of personal pronouns , 1990 .

[14]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse , 1988 .

[15]  W. McGregor.  Greenberg on the first person inclusive dual: Evidence from some Australian languages , 1989 .

[16]  J. Greenberg.  On a metalanguage for pronominal systems: A reply to McGregor , 1989 .

[17]  Felix K. Ameka,et al.  A comparative analysis of linguistic routines in two languages: English and ewe , 1987 .

[18]  H. Conklin.  LEXICOGRAPHICAL TREATMENT OF FOLK TAXONOMIES , 1968 .

[19]  D. Lee.  Notes on the conception of the self among the Wintu Indians. , 1950, Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology.

[20]  Gillian Sankoff,et al.  Man's Many Voices , 1970 .

[21]  Cliff Goddard,et al.  The lexical semantics of “good feelings” in Yankunytjatjara , 1990 .

[22]  C. Goddard.  Particles and illocutionary semantics , 1979 .

[23]  P. Mühlhäusler,et al.  Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity , 1990 .

[24]  W. Bruce Croft.  Typology and Universals , 1990 .

[25]  Joseph H. Greenberg,et al.  The First Person Inclusive Dual as an Ambiguous Category , 1990, On Language.

[26]  É. Benveniste,et al.  Problems in general linguistics , 1971 .

[27]  Paul Forchheimer.  The category of person in language , 1953 .

[28]  Edith A. Moravcsik,et al.  Universals of human language , 1978 .

[29]  Robert Dixon,et al.  The languages of Australia , 1980 .

[30]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[31]  Cliff Goddard,et al.  Anger in the Western Desert: A Case Study in the Cross-Cultural Semantics of Emotion , 1991 .