Force–velocity trade‐off in Darwin's finch jaw function: a biomechanical basis for ecological speciation?

Summary 1. Biomechanical trade-offs have been proposed to constrain trajectories of evolutionary diversification. In songbirds, however, one such trade-off may facilitate diversification; adaptations that enhance bite force capacity are assumed to constrain vocal performance by hampering velocities of beak gape modulations required for vocal resonance tracking during song production. Resulting divergence in vocal mating signals may thus generate mating isolation between groups that eat foods of differing size and hardness. 2. We tested for a force‐velocity trade-off in jaw function in Darwin’s finches, by measuring bite forces and jaw movements during song production in birds on Santa Cruz Island. Bite force and speed of jaw closing varied broadly in our sample, and were negatively correlated both within and among species. Moreover, these correlations were largely independent of overall body size and phylogenetic relationships. 3. Adaptations to varying food types thus appear to drive divergence not only in beak size and bite force, but also in jaw closing velocity and vocal performance capacity. These results support a biomechanical link between adaptive divergence and mating signal divergence, the two key features that were assumed to have driven this radiation.

[1]  P. Grant,et al.  Oscillating selection on Darwin's finches , 1987, Nature.

[2]  D. Schluter,et al.  Parallel Speciation by Natural Selection , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[3]  B. Grant,et al.  Genetics and the origin of bird species. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Hans Slabbekoorn,et al.  Does bill size polymorphism affect courtship song characteristics in the African finch Pyrenestes ostrinus , 2000 .

[5]  W. Hoese,et al.  Vocal tract function in birdsong production: experimental manipulation of beak movements. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  Anthony R. Ives,et al.  An Introduction to Phylogenetically Based Statistical Methods, with a New Method for Confidence Intervals on Ancestral Values , 1999 .

[7]  P. Aerts,et al.  SPEED AND STAMINA TRADE-OFF IN LACERTID LIZARDS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  S. Nowicki,et al.  Chapter 11 – Performance limits on birdsong , 2004 .

[9]  C. Gans,et al.  Functional bases of fiber length and angulation in muscle , 1987, Journal of morphology.

[10]  A. Herrel,et al.  Evolution of bite force in Darwin's finches: a key role for head width , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[11]  T. J. Grant,et al.  Ecological Speciation in South Atlantic Island Finches , 2007, Science.

[12]  P. Grant,et al.  Comparative Ecology of Galapagos Ground Finches (Geospiza Gould): Evaluation of the Importance of Floristic Diversity and Interspecific Competition , 1977 .

[13]  J. Podos Discrimination of geographical song variants by Darwin's finches , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  J. Podos,et al.  Beak morphology and song features covary in a population of Darwin’s finches (Geospiza fortis) , 2006 .

[15]  N. Fletcher,et al.  Songbirds tune their vocal tract to the fundamental frequency of their song. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Carel ten Cate,et al.  Pure-tone birdsong by resonance filtering of harmonic overtones , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  S. Chiba,et al.  Trade‐Offs between Force and Fit: Extreme Morphologies Associated with Feeding Behavior in Carabid Beetles , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[18]  MORPHOLOGICAL ADAPTATION INFLUENCES THE EVOLUTION OF A MATING SIGNAL , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  S. J. Arnold Constraints on Phenotypic Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[20]  A. Hendry,et al.  Reproductive isolation of sympatric morphs in a population of Darwin's finches , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  C. Vinyard,et al.  Comparative analysis of masseter fiber architecture in tree‐gouging (Callithrix jacchus) and nongouging (Saguinus oedipus) callitrichids , 2004, Journal of morphology.

[22]  M. Westneat,et al.  Transmission of force and velocity in the feeding mechanisms of labrid fishes (Teleostei, Perciformes) , 1994, Zoomorphology.

[23]  B. Grant,et al.  A phylogeny of Darwin's finches based on microsatellite DNA length variation , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Douglas A. Nelson,et al.  Feature Weighting in Species Song Recognition By the Field Sparrow (Spizella Pusilla) , 1988 .

[25]  W. Hoese,et al.  Birdsong: motor function and the evolution of communication , 1992 .

[26]  W. Gronenberg,et al.  Optimizing force and velocity: mandible muscle fibre attachments in ants , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[27]  T. Price Diet Variation in a Population of Darwin's Finches , 1987 .

[28]  J. Podos Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches , 2001, Nature.

[29]  Peter Marler,et al.  How Do Birds Sing , 1988 .

[30]  D. Schluter,et al.  The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation , 2000 .

[31]  J. Levinton,et al.  The paradox of the weakening combatant: trade‐off between closing force and gripping speed in a sexually selected combat structure , 2005 .

[32]  N. Seddon ECOLOGICAL ADAPTATION AND SPECIES RECOGNITION DRIVES VOCAL EVOLUTION IN NEOTROPICAL SUBOSCINE BIRDS , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  S. Peters,et al.  Ontogeny of vocal tract movements during song production in song sparrows , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  D. Schluter,et al.  Ecological Character Displacement and Speciation in Sticklebacks , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[35]  J. H. Long,et al.  Kinematics of birdsong: functional correlation of cranial movements and acoustic features in sparrows. , 1993, The Journal of experimental biology.

[36]  Jeffrey Podos,et al.  A PERFORMANCE CONSTRAINT ON THE EVOLUTION OF TRILLED VOCALIZATIONS IN A SONGBIRD FAMILY (PASSERIFORMES: EMBERIZIDAE) , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  Russell Greenberg,et al.  Macrogeographic Vocal Variation in Subspecies of Swamp Sparrow , 2008 .

[38]  A. Herrel,et al.  Bite performance and morphology in a population of Darwin's finches: implications for the evolution of beak shape , 2005 .

[39]  D. Schluter,et al.  Using Phylogenies to Test Macroevolutionary Hypotheses of Trait Evolution in Cranes (Gruinae) , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[40]  J. Podos,et al.  Vocal mechanics in Darwin's finches: correlation of beak gape and song frequency , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[41]  A. Herrel,et al.  Evolution of bite performance in turtles , 2002 .

[42]  Dolph Schluter,et al.  ADAPTIVE RADIATION ALONG GENETIC LINES OF LEAST RESISTANCE , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[43]  P. Grant,et al.  Intense Natural Selection in a Population of Darwin's Finches (Geospizinae) in the Gal�pagos , 1981, Science.

[44]  Andrew P Hendry,et al.  Possible human impacts on adaptive radiation: beak size bimodality in Darwin's finches , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  S. Nowicki,et al.  Vocal tract resonances in oscine bird sound production: evidence from birdsongs in a helium atmosphere , 1987, Nature.