Low-Rank and Sparse Matrix Decomposition with Cluster Weighting for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

Hyperspectral anomaly detection plays an important role in the field of remote sensing. It provides a way to distinguish interested targets from the background without any prior knowledge. The majority of pixels in the hyperspectral dataset belong to the background, and they can be well represented by several endmembers, so the background has a low-rank property. Anomalous targets usually account for a tiny part of the dataset, and they are considered to have a sparse property. Recently, the low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition (LRaSMD) technique has drawn great attention as a method for solving anomaly detection problems. In this letter, a new anomaly detection method based on LRaSMD and cluster weighting is proposed. We concentrate on the sparse part, which contains most of anomaly information, and calculate the initial anomaly matrix based on this part. To suppress background regions and discriminate anomalies from the background more distinctly, a weighting strategy in terms of the clustering result is used, and then the anomaly matrix is updated. The judgement of anomalies is made according to the responses on the matrix. Our proposed method considers the characteristics of anomalies from the spectral dimension and the spatial distribution simultaneously. Experiments on three hyperspectral datasets demonstrate the outstanding performance of the proposed method.

[1]  Heesung Kwon,et al.  Adaptive anomaly detection using subspace separation for hyperspectral imagery , 2003 .

[2]  Qian Du,et al.  Collaborative Representation for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  S Matteoli,et al.  A tutorial overview of anomaly detection in hyperspectral images , 2010, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[4]  Chiman Kwan,et al.  A Novel Cluster Kernel RX Algorithm for Anomaly and Change Detection Using Hyperspectral Images , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  John P. Kerekes,et al.  Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Confidence Intervals and Regions , 2008, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[6]  Bo Du,et al.  A Low-Rank and Sparse Matrix Decomposition-Based Mahalanobis Distance Method for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  David W. Messinger,et al.  The SHARE 2012 data campaign , 2013, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[8]  Trac D. Tran,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Dictionary-Based Sparse Representation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  A. Hadi,et al.  BACON: blocked adaptive computationally efficient outlier nominators , 2000 .

[10]  J. Chanussot,et al.  Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data Analysis and Future Challenges , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine.

[11]  Gongjian Wen,et al.  Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection via Background Estimation and Adaptive Weighted Sparse Representation , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[12]  John P. Kerekes,et al.  SpecTIR hyperspectral airborne Rochester experiment data collection campaign , 2012, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[13]  Heesung Kwon,et al.  Kernel RX-algorithm: a nonlinear anomaly detector for hyperspectral imagery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Mark J. Carlotto,et al.  A cluster-based approach for detecting man-made objects and changes in imagery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Weighted-RXD and Linear Filter-Based RXD: Improving Background Statistics Estimation for Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Data clustering: a review , 1999, CSUR.

[17]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Is there a best hyperspectral detection algorithm? , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[18]  E. M. Winter,et al.  Anomaly detection from hyperspectral imagery , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[19]  Yi Ma,et al.  Robust principal component analysis? , 2009, JACM.

[20]  Stefania Matteoli,et al.  Hyperspectral Airborne “Viareggio 2013 Trial” Data Collection for Detection Algorithm Assessment , 2016, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[21]  Yuan Tian,et al.  Anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery based on low-rank and sparse decomposition , 2014, International Conference on Graphic and Image Processing.

[22]  Xiaoli Yu,et al.  Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[23]  Weiyue Li,et al.  Low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition-based anomaly detection for hyperspectral imagery , 2014 .

[24]  Eric Truslow,et al.  Detection Algorithms in Hyperspectral Imaging Systems: An Overview of Practical Algorithms , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.