Promises and Partnership Author ( s ) :

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. The Econometric Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Econometrica. We examine experimentally the impact of communication on trust and cooperation. Our design admits observation of promises, lies, and beliefs. The evidence is consistent with people striving to live up to others' expectations so as to avoid guilt, as can be modeled using psychological game theory. When players exhibit such guilt aversion, communication may influence motivation and behavior by influencing beliefs about beliefs. Promises may enhance trustworthy behavior, which is what we observe. We argue that guilt aversion may be relevant for understanding strategic interaction in a variety of settings, and that it may shed light on the role of language, discussions, agreements, and social norms in these contexts.

[1]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Guilt: an interpersonal approach. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  B. Bernheim,et al.  A Theory of Conformity , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  M. Rabin Published by: American , 2022 .

[4]  Martin Dufwenberg,et al.  Measuring Beliefs in an Experimental Lost Wallet Game , 2000, Games Econ. Behav..

[5]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition , 2000 .

[6]  Edward,et al.  Measuring Trust , 2000 .

[7]  Gary Charness,et al.  Expressed Preferences and Behavior in Experimental Games , 2004 .

[8]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity , 2001 .

[9]  Pierpaolo Battigalli,et al.  Dynamic Psychological Games , 2005, J. Econ. Theory.

[10]  M. Dufwenberg,et al.  Social Norms and Moral Hazard , 2001 .

[11]  Martin Dufwenberg,et al.  Marital investments, time consistency and emotions , 2002 .

[12]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[13]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment , 2001 .

[14]  Martin Dufwenberg,et al.  A theory of sequential reciprocity , 2004, Games Econ. Behav..

[15]  Michael Bacharach,et al.  Is Trust Self-Fulfilling? An Experimental Study , 2001 .

[16]  J. Morgan,et al.  Cheap Talk , 2005 .

[17]  D. Levine Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments , 1998 .

[18]  J. Elster Social Norms and Economic Theory , 1989, Handbook of Monetary Policy.

[19]  M. Rabin,et al.  Understanding Social Preference with Simple Tests , 2001 .

[20]  P. H. Huang,et al.  More Order Without More Law: A Theory of Social Norms and Organizational Cultures , 1994 .

[21]  T. Mulgan The Contract Theory , 2006 .

[22]  B. Frey,et al.  Social Comparisons and Pro-social Behavior: Testing "Conditional Cooperation" in a Field Experiment , 2004 .

[23]  N. Kerr,et al.  Communication, commitment, and cooperation in social dilemma. , 1994 .

[24]  Joyce E. Berg,et al.  Trust, reciprocity and social history’, Games and Economic Behaviour, . , 1995 .

[25]  Faruk Gul,et al.  The Canonical Type Space for Interdependent Preferences , 2005 .

[26]  J. Geanakoplos,et al.  Psychological games and sequential rationality , 1989 .

[27]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. , 1977 .

[28]  M. Johannesson,et al.  Promises, Threats and Fairness , 2004 .

[29]  Dione. Brunson Super/System A Course in Power Poker , 1994 .

[30]  Vincent P. Crawford,et al.  A Survey of Experiments on Communication via Cheap Talk , 1998 .

[31]  J. Nash THE BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1950, Classics in Game Theory.

[32]  E. Fehr,et al.  Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[33]  Uri Gneezy,et al.  Deception: The Role of Consequences , 2005 .

[34]  W. Güth,et al.  Efficiency by trust in fairness? multiperiod ultimatum bargaining experiments with an increasing cake , 1993 .

[35]  J. Tangney,et al.  Recent Advances in the Empirical Study of Shame and Guilt , 1995 .

[36]  Joel Sobel,et al.  INTERDEPENDENT PREFERENCES AND RECIPROCITY , 2005 .

[37]  L. Ross,et al.  The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes , 1977 .

[38]  John H. Kagel,et al.  Partial Gift Exchange in an Experimental Labor Market: Impact of Subject Population Differences, Productivity Differences, and Effort Requests on Behavior* , 2002, Journal of Labor Economics.

[39]  Martin Dufwenberg,et al.  The Framing of Games and the Psychology of Strategic Choice , 2006 .