Domain Specificity in Human Symmetry Preferences: Symmetry is Most Pleasant When Looking at Human Faces

Visual symmetry has been found to be preferred to asymmetry in a variety of domains and across species. A number of theories propose to explain why symmetry is preferred. In this article, I compare a perceptual bias view, in which symmetry is preferred due to factors inherit to the visual system, and an evolutionary advantage view, in which symmetry is preferred due to selection pressures on partner preference. Preferences for symmetry in three stimulus types were determined by having symmetric and asymmetric versions of the same images rated for pleasantness: human female faces, macaque monkey faces, and abstract art. It was found that preferences for symmetry were strongest for human female faces and weakest for art. This finding builds on previous research suggesting that symmetry preferences for human faces are different from symmetry preferences in other domains and that simple perceptual bias explanations do not wholly explain human visual face symmetry preferences. While consistent with an evolutionary advantage view, these data are also potentially explainable via a perceptual bias view which accounts for experience of stimuli. The interplay between these two views is discussed in the context of the current study.

[1]  D. Perrett,et al.  When Facial Attractiveness is Only Skin Deep , 2004, Perception.

[2]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health: Support for a “good genes” explanation of the attractiveness–symmetry relationship , 2001 .

[3]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  Symmetry, beauty and evolution , 1994, Nature.

[4]  A. Møller,et al.  Asymmetry, Developmental Stability, and Evolution , 1998 .

[5]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial masculinity and fluctuating asymmetry , 2003 .

[6]  A. Little,et al.  Attraction independent of detection suggests special mechanisms for symmetry preferences in human face perception , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Ernst Gombrich,et al.  The Sense of Order: A Study in the Psychology of Decorative Art , 1979 .

[9]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[10]  PV.,et al.  Contributions to the Analysis of the Sensations , 1897, Nature.

[11]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. , 1999 .

[12]  Coren L Apicella,et al.  Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  William M. Burke Beauty and Evolution , 2003 .

[14]  K. Hugenberg,et al.  Vulnerability to disease is associated with a domain‐specific preference for symmetrical faces relative to symmetrical non‐face stimuli , 2011 .

[15]  A. Møller Developmental Stability and Fitness: A Review , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[16]  D. Perrett,et al.  Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  P Wenderoth,et al.  Detection of Bilateral Symmetry in Complex Biological Images , 2000, Perception.

[19]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Attractiveness of Facial Averageness and Symmetry in Non-Western Cultures: In Search of Biologically Based Standards of Beauty , 2001, Perception.

[20]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Generalization and the evolution of symmetry preferences , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Derek Hodgson,et al.  The First Appearance of Symmetry in the Human Lineage: Where Perception Meets Art , 2011, Symmetry.

[22]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry Is Related to Sexual Dimorphism in Faces: Data Across Culture and Species , 2008, PloS one.

[23]  J. Kekäläinen,et al.  Male Facial Anthropometry and Attractiveness , 2012, Perception.

[24]  D. I. Lewis-Jones,et al.  Developmental Stability, Ejaculate Size, and Sperm Quality in Men , 1998 .

[25]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women , 2006 .

[26]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  Manuel Soler,et al.  Breast asymmetry, sexual selection, and human reproductive success , 1995 .

[28]  Bernard Tiddeman,et al.  Prototyping and Transforming Facial Textures for Perception Research , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[29]  John Stillwell,et al.  Symmetry , 2000, Am. Math. Mon..

[30]  David R. Feinberg,et al.  Symmetry and sexual dimorphism in human faces: interrelated preferences suggest both signal quality , 2008 .

[31]  P. Hancock,et al.  The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgments of human male facial attractiveness. , 2002, British journal of psychology.

[32]  T. Joel Wade,et al.  The Relationships between Symmetry and Attractiveness and Mating Relevant Decisions and Behavior: A Review , 2010, Symmetry.

[33]  Yuji Moro,et al.  Facial Asymmetry and Attractiveness Judgment in Developmental Perspective , 2001 .

[34]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Bilateral Symmetry and Sexual Selection: A Meta‐Analysis , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[35]  G K Humphrey,et al.  Bilateral Symmetry Detection: Testing a ‘Callosal’ Hypothesis , 1996, Perception.

[36]  F. Attneave Symmetry, information, and memory for patterns. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[37]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Are Average Facial Configurations Attractive Only Because of Their Symmetry? , 1999 .

[38]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty , 1998 .

[39]  P. Weatherhead,et al.  Bilateral symmetry and social dominance in captive male red-winged blackbirds , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[40]  David I Perrett,et al.  Extracting Prototypical Facial Images from Exemplars , 2013, Perception.

[41]  A. Little,et al.  Exposure to visual cues of pathogen contagion changes preferences for masculinity and symmetry in opposite-sex faces , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  Stefan Van Dongen,et al.  Associations between asymmetry and human attractiveness: Possible direct effects of asymmetry and signatures of publication bias. , 2011 .

[43]  A. Little,et al.  Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  A. Little,et al.  Preferences for Symmetry in Conspecific Facial Shape Among Macaca mulatta , 2006, International Journal of Primatology.

[45]  D. Perrett,et al.  Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[46]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  Evolutionary biology: The secrets of faces , 1998, Nature.

[47]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Perceived Health Contributes to the Attractiveness of Facial Symmetry, Averageness, and Sexual Dimorphism , 2007, Perception.

[48]  Diane Scutt,et al.  Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women , 1997 .

[49]  M. Enquist,et al.  Experimental evidence of receiver bias for symmetry , 2002, Animal Behaviour.