A holistic sustainability assessment tool for bioenergy using the Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP) sustainability indicators

In 2011 the Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP) released a set of indicators for sustainable bioenergy. However, two important issues still remain unresolved. One of them is the definition of “sustainability”, and the other is the lack of a holistic assessment tool for drawing conclusions from the indicators. The aim of this paper is to provide clarification on the concept of sustainability in the context of the GBEP indicators, and to develop a holistic assessment tool for assessing the sustainability of bioenergy programmes. The GBEP indicators are diverse in terms of “what to measure”, and some of them are not sufficiently directly related to the concept of sustainability. This makes the indicators ambiguous regarding to sustainability assessment. This study identifies whether the GBEP indicators are concerned with strong or weak sustainability, and develops a tool based on Multi Criteria Analysis (MCA) which can be used for assessing sustainability of bioenergy programmes using the GBEP indicators. The tool is demonstrated in an example for assessing the sustainability of biofuel production in a case study of Kyoto. We found that the biodiesel production in Kyoto performs well on the environmental pillar, but badly on the economic pillar, and based on the weights applied in this study the overall sustainability is better than diesel fuel. The holistic assessment tool provides practical information to policymakers on both ex-ante and ex-post policy evaluations.

[1]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Ranking of biomass pellets by integration of economic, environmental and technical factors , 2012 .

[2]  L. Phillips,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis: a manual , 2009 .

[3]  P. Glavič,et al.  How to compare companies on relevant dimensions of sustainability , 2005 .

[4]  J. Mysiak.  Consistency of the Results of Different MCA Methods: A Critical Review , 2006 .

[5]  James Scott,et al.  A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for bioenergy systems , 2012 .

[6]  Edgard Gnansounou,et al.  Assessing the sustainability of biofuels: a logic-based model. , 2011 .

[7]  Martin Junginger,et al.  Overview of recent developments in sustainable biomass certification , 2007 .

[8]  Julia Blasch,et al.  Sustainability standards for bioenergy—A means to reduce climate change risks? , 2010 .

[9]  Laurence Turcksin,et al.  A multi-actor multi-criteria framework to assess the stakeholder support for different biofuel options: The case of Belgium , 2011 .

[10]  Markku Lehtonen,et al.  Do we need a unified appraisal framework to synthesize biofuel impacts , 2013 .

[11]  J Villegas,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biofuels: energy and greenhouse gas balances. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[12]  Christian Azar,et al.  Emerging scarcities - bioenergy-food competition in a carbon constrained world. , 2005 .

[13]  E. Neumayer.  Weak Versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring The Limits Of Two Opposing Paradigms , 2010 .

[14]  Lars Hein,et al.  The Impact of First-Generation Biofuels on the Depletion of the Global Phosphorus Reserve , 2012, AMBIO.

[15]  Nicolae Scarlat,et al.  Recent developments of biofuels/bioenergy sustainability certification: A global overview , 2011 .

[16]  Benjamin Senauer,et al.  Food Market Effects of a Global Resource Shift Toward Bioenergy , 2008 .

[17]  M. Burgman.  Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management: Experts, stakeholders and elicitation , 2005 .

[18]  A. Barrera-Roldán,et al.  Proposal and application of a Sustainable Development Index , 2002 .

[19]  Peter A. Victor,et al.  How Strong is Weak Sustainability , 1998 .

[20]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[21]  Sascha Kraus,et al.  The role of corporate social responsibility in strong sustainability , 2008 .

[22]  Morgan Fröling,et al.  Life cycle assessment of hydrotreated vegetable oil from rape, oil palm and Jatropha , 2011 .

[23]  R. Clift,et al.  Developing a sustainability framework for the assessment of bioenergy systems , 2007 .

[24]  T. Buchholz,et al.  Sustainability criteria for bioenergy systems: results from an expert survey , 2009 .

[25]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[26]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Qualitative multi-criteria approaches to assessing indicators of sustainable forest resource management , 2003 .

[27]  Leo Dobes,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis: ignorance or negligence? , 2010 .

[28]  V. Martinet.  A characterization of sustainability with indicators , 2011 .

[29]  Gilberto C. Gallopín,et al.  Environmental and sustainability indicators and the concept of situational indicators. A systems approach , 1996 .

[30]  Timothy A. Volk,et al.  Multi criteria analysis for bioenergy systems assessments , 2009 .

[31]  A. Ajanovic.  Biofuels versus food production: Does biofuels production increase food prices? , 2011 .

[32]  Clara Valente,et al.  LCA of environmental and socio-economic impacts related to wood energy production in alpine conditions: Valle di Fiemme (Italy) , 2011 .

[33]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Environmental Applications and Case Studies , 2011 .

[34]  Maite Cabeza Gutés.  The concept of weak sustainability , 1996 .

[35]  Bjart Holtsmark.  Material for : Harvesting in boreal forests and the biofuel carbon debt , 2011 .

[36]  Christopher J. Koroneos,et al.  Comparative LCA of the use of biodiesel, diesel and gasoline for transportation , 2012 .