A cortical pooling model of spatial summation for perimetric stimuli.

Contemporary models of perimetric sensitivity assume probability summation of retinal ganglion cell sensitivities, ignoring cortical processing. To assess the role of cortical processing in perimetric spatial summation, we used a common form of multiple-mechanism spatial vision model in which the stimulus is sampled by receptive fields analogous to those of simple cells in primary visual cortex. Psychophysical threshold was computed by probability summation across the receptive fields. When the receptive fields were nonoriented (like ganglion cells), the spatial summation function had a large nonmonotonic transitional region that was inconsistent with perimetric spatial summation data. When the receptive fields were orientation tuned (like cortical cells), the model was able to give good fits to perimetric spatial summation data. The predictions of the model were evaluated with a masking study, in which noise masks either enlarged the critical area or changed the shape of the spatial summation functions. We conclude that cortical pooling by multiple spatial mechanisms can account for perimetric spatial summation, whereas probability summation across ganglion cells cannot.

[1]  D. H. Kelly Spatiotemporal variation of chromatic and achromatic contrast thresholds. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[2]  William H Swanson,et al.  Evaluation of a Two-Stage Neural Model of Glaucomatous Defect: An Approach to Reduce Test–Retest Variability , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[3]  N. Graham Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[4]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Contrast matching data predicted from contrast increment thresholds , 1984, Vision Research.

[5]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Effects of target size and eccentricity on visual detection and resolution , 1978, Vision Research.

[6]  K Kani,et al.  Retinal sensitivity and spatial summation in the foveal and parafoveal regions. , 1981, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  A B Watson,et al.  Estimation of local spatial scale. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  R. Hess,et al.  Human peripheral spatial resolution for achromatic and chromatic stimuli: limits imposed by optical and retinal factors. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  R. Anderson The psychophysics of glaucoma: Improving the structure/function relationship , 2006, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[10]  M E Wilson,et al.  Invariant features of spatial summation with changing locus in the visual field , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[12]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION. , 1965, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[13]  C. Tyler,et al.  Signal detection theory in the 2AFC paradigm: attention, channel uncertainty and probability summation , 2000, Vision Research.

[14]  Quick Rf A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection. , 1974 .

[15]  D Whitaker,et al.  Magnification perimetry. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Full-spectrum cone sensitivity functions for X-chromosome-linked anomalous trichromats. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  Neural losses correlated with visual losses in clinical perimetry. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[19]  A M McKendrick,et al.  Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm , 1975, Vision Research.

[21]  F. Fitzke,et al.  Scaling the hill of vision: the physiological relationship between light sensitivity and ganglion cell numbers. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  Hao Sun,et al.  Linearity Can Account for the Similarity Among Conventional, Frequency-Doubling, and Gabor-Based Perimetric Tests in the Glaucomatous Macula , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[23]  C. Johnson,et al.  Modeling the sensitivity to variability relationship in perimetry , 2006, Vision Research.

[24]  Matteo Carandini,et al.  Two Distinct Mechanisms of Suppression in Human Vision , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  W. Swanson,et al.  Extracting thresholds from noisy psychophysical data , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  K. Mullen,et al.  The spatial tuning of chromatic mechanisms identified by simultaneous masking , 1994, Vision Research.

[27]  S. Drance,et al.  Studies of spatial summation of central retinal areas in normal people of all ages. , 1971, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[28]  H. Goldmann,et al.  Fundamentals of exact perimetry , 1999 .

[29]  Joel Pokorny,et al.  The design and use of a cone chromaticity space: A tutorial , 1996 .

[30]  William H Swanson,et al.  Perimetric defects and ganglion cell damage: interpreting linear relations using a two-stage neural model. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[31]  V. Glezer The receptive fields of the retina. , 1965, Vision research.

[32]  A. Watson,et al.  A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[33]  R. Hess,et al.  Low spatial frequencies are suppressively masked across spatial scale, orientation, field position, and eye of origin. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[34]  L. L. Sloan Area and luminance of test object as variables in examination of the visual field by projection perimetry , 1961 .

[35]  H Goldmann Fundamentals of exact perimetry. 1945. , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[36]  T. Meese,et al.  Probability summation for multiple patches of luminance modulation , 2000, Vision Research.