Communication and Decision Making About Life-Sustaining Treatment: Examining the Experiences of Resident Physicians and Seriously-Ill Hospitalized Patients

BACKGROUNDDespite evidence-based recommendations for communication and decision making about life-sustaining treatment, resident physicians’ actual practice may vary. Few prior studies have examined these conversations qualitatively to uncover why ineffective communication styles may persist. OBJECTIVETo explore how discussions about life-sustaining treatment occur and examine the factors that influence physicians’ communicative practices in hopes of providing novel insight into how these processes can be improved.PARTICIPANTS AND APPROACHWe conducted and recorded 56 qualitative semi-structured interviews with participants from 28 matched dyads of a resident physician and a hospitalized patient or their surrogate decision maker with whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation was discussed. Transcripts were analyzed and coded using the constant comparative method to develop themes.MAIN RESULTSResident physicians introduced decisions about resuscitation in a scripted, depersonalized and procedure-focused manner. Decision makers exhibited a poor understanding of the decision they were being asked to make and resident physicians often disagreed with the decision. Residents did not advocate for a particular course of action; however, the discussions of resuscitation were framed in ways that may have implicitly influenced decision making.CONCLUSIONSResidents’ communication practices may stem from their attempt to balance an informed choice model of decision making with their interest in providing appropriate care for the patient. Physicians’ beliefs about mandatory autonomy may be an impediment to improving communication about patients’ choices for life-sustaining treatment. Redefining the role of the physician will be necessary if a shared decision making model is to be adopted.

[1]  H. Brody,et al.  Physician Recommendations and Patient Autonomy: Finding a Balance between Physician Power and Patient Choice , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  R. Epstein,et al.  The Patient-Physician Relationship , 2002 .

[3]  C. Griffith,et al.  Discussing preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: what do resident physicians and their hospitalized patients think was decided? , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[4]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[5]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship. , 1992, JAMA.

[6]  J. Lynn,et al.  Outcomes, preferences for resuscitation, and physician-patient communication among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. , 1998, The American journal of medicine.

[7]  A. Abernethy,et al.  Families looking back: One year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[8]  Mark D Schwartz,et al.  Effect of communications training on medical student performance. , 2003, JAMA.

[9]  D. Tobin,et al.  End-of-life conversations: evolving practice and theory. , 2000, JAMA.

[10]  Ronald M Epstein,et al.  Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. , 2004, JAMA.

[11]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Patient-based outcome results from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. , 2004, Family practice.

[12]  J. Tulsky,et al.  Patient knowledge and physician predictions of treatment preferences after discussion of advance directives , 1998, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[13]  William Godolphin,et al.  Putting informed and shared decision making into practice , 2006, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[14]  H. Llewellyn-Thomas,et al.  Assessing Preferences about the DNR Order , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[15]  J. Weiner,et al.  Avoiding iatrogenic harm to patient and family while discussing goals of care near the end of life. , 2006, Journal of palliative medicine.

[16]  L. Goldman,et al.  Patient characteristics in SUPPORT: activity status and cognitive function. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  C. Charles,et al.  Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[18]  Nick Barber,et al.  Patient-doctor decision-making about treatment within the consultation--a critical analysis of models. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[19]  Sylvia Bereknyei,et al.  Toward shared decision making at the end of life in intensive care units: opportunities for improvement. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[20]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Sources of ethical conflict in medical housestaff training: a qualitative study. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[21]  D. Ronis,et al.  Racial/Ethnic Preferences, Sex Preferences, and Perceived Discrimination Related to End‐of‐Life Care , 2006, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[22]  Amy P. Abernethy,et al.  Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units , 2001, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[23]  S. Lurie,et al.  Raising the passing grade for studies of medical education. , 2003, JAMA.

[24]  S. Whitney A New Model of Medical Decisions: Exploring the Limits of Shared Decision Making , 2003, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[25]  S. Murphy,et al.  Ethnicity and attitudes towards life sustaining technology. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[26]  Alexander K. Smith,et al.  Resident approaches to advance care planning on the day of hospital admission. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[27]  James A Tulsky,et al.  Interventions to enhance communication among patients, providers, and families. , 2005, Journal of palliative medicine.

[28]  L. Hasher,et al.  Framing effects in younger and older adults. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[29]  N. Wenger,et al.  End-of-life decision making , 2000, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[30]  J. Tulsky,et al.  A Controlled Trial of a Short Course to Improve Residents' Communication With Patients at the End of Life , 2006, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[31]  James T.C. Li The Patient-Physician Relationship: In Response , 1996 .

[32]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: the case for a broader conceptual framework. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[33]  J. Tulsky,et al.  How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients? , 1995, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[34]  A. Gafni,et al.  The seriously ill hospitalized patient: preferred role in end-of-life decision making? , 2003, Journal of critical care.