Who's got the floor?

This study into the nature of “the floor” actually began as an open-ended inquiry into sex differences that might occur beyond the sentence level in the multi-party interaction of five informal committee meetings. Technical difficulties prompted the trying out of several different transcription displays, most of which failed to capture the “feel” of the interaction and each of which biased (in its own way) the perception of what had actually gone on. The type of unconventional display eventually used was intended to show the floor holder in the center of the page, flanked by co-occurring talk. Because there were many episodes for which a single floor holder could not be identified, the primary focus of the study shifted to the nature of the floor itself. Questions about sex differences became a secondary and succeeding focus. In the analysis, “floor” and “turn” were distinguished on the basis of “participant-sense” rather than technical criteria. Two kinds of floors were subjectively identified: F1, a singly developed floor; and F2, a collaborative venture where several people seemed to be either operating on the same wavelength or engaging in a free-for-all. The two kinds of floors were differentiated objectively by such features as quantity and frequency participation, language functions, number of nonturn utterances, overlaps, and pauses. There were indeed sex/language differences, but these were related to the type of floor being developed. Men took more and longer turns and did more of the joking, arguing, directing, and soliciting of responses F1 's. Turn length and frequency differences were neutralized in F2's, and certain language functions were used by women to a greater extent in F2's than in F1 's. (Conversational analysis, gender and language, qualitative research methodology.)

[1]  Frederick F. Stephan,et al.  The Distribution of Participation in Small Groups: An Exponential Approximation , 1952 .

[2]  R. Coser.  Laughter among colleagues. A study of the social functions of humor among the staff of a mental hospital. , 1960, Psychiatry.

[3]  Philip Babcock Gove,et al.  Webster's third new international dictionary of the English language, unabridged, with seven language dictionary , 1971 .

[4]  W. F. Soskin,et al.  The Study of Spontaneous Talk. , 1963 .

[5]  R. Barker,et al.  The Stream of Behavior , 1965 .

[6]  A. Kendon.  Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[7]  E. Goffman.  Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[8]  E. Schegloff.  Sequencing in Conversational Openings , 1968 .

[9]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[10]  H. Blumer,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method , 1988 .

[11]  V. Yngve.  On getting a word in edgewise , 1970 .

[12]  D. P. Hayes,et al.  Interruption Outcomes and Vocal Amplitude: Explorations in Social Psychophysics. , 1971 .

[13]  S. Duncan,et al.  Some Signals and Rules for Taking Speaking Turns in Conversations , 1972 .

[14]  E. Tiryakian,et al.  Studies in social interaction , 1972 .

[15]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Opening up Closings , 1973 .

[16]  G. Jefferson.  A Case of Precision Timing in Ordinary Conversation: Overlapped Tag-Positioned Address Terms in Closing Sequences , 1973 .

[17]  J. D. Starkey.  Toward a Grammar for Dyadic Conversation , 1973 .

[18]  H. Mehan.  ACCOMPLISHING CLASSROOM LESSONS , 1974 .

[19]  S. Duncan,et al.  On signalling that it's your turn to speak☆ , 1974 .

[20]  C. Kramer,et al.  Women's speech: Separate but unequal? , 1974 .

[21]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[22]  P. Giglioli,et al.  Language and Social Context , 1974 .

[23]  Aaron V. Cicourel,et al.  Language Use and School Performance , 1974 .

[24]  R. Bauman,et al.  Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking , 1975 .

[25]  B. Thorne,et al.  Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance , 1975 .

[26]  Notes on confrontation in conversation , 1975 .

[27]  Susan J. Kalcik,et al.  "... Like Ann's Gynecologist or the Time I Was Almost Raped": Personal Narratives in Women's Rap Groups , 1975 .

[28]  S. Philips.  Some sources of cultural variability in the regulation of talk , 1976, Language in Society.

[29]  Conversational Structure and Accurate Empathy: an Exploratory Study , 1976 .

[30]  E. Spelke,et al.  Skills of divided attention , 1976, Cognition.

[31]  Kenji Hakuta,et al.  Trends in Second-Language- Acquisition Research , 1977 .

[32]  QUALITATIVE/QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES IN EDUCATION: A LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE , 1977 .

[33]  Frederick Erickson,et al.  SOME APPROACHES TO INQUIRY IN SCHOOL‐COMMUNITY ETHNOGRAPHY , 1977 .

[34]  V. Dijk,et al.  Context and cognition: Knowledge frames and speech act comprehension , 1977 .

[35]  E. Goody.  Questions and politeness : strategies in social interaction , 1978 .

[36]  A. Mchoul,et al.  The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom , 1978, Language in Society.

[37]  P. Brown,et al.  Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena , 1978 .

[38]  Barbara Westbrook Eakins,et al.  Sex differences in human communication , 1978 .

[39]  Jim Schenkein.  Studies in the organization of conversational interaction , 1978 .

[40]  P. Fishman,et al.  Interaction: The Work Women Do , 1978 .

[41]  H. Mehan.  Structuring School Structure , 1978 .

[42]  E. Cuff,et al.  The Recommencement of a Meeting as a Member's Accomplishment , 1978 .

[43]  N. Henley,et al.  Perspectives on Language and Communication , 1978, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[44]  Gail Jefferson,et al.  chapter 6 – Some Sequential Negotiations in Conversation: UNEXPANDED AND EXPANDED VERSIONS OF PROJECTED ACTION SEQUENCES* , 1978 .

[45]  Genderlects: A Brief Review of the Literature. , 1978 .

[46]  Proceedings of the Conference on the Sociology of the Languages of American Women , 1979 .

[47]  C. West,et al.  AGAINST OUR WILL: MALE INTERRUPTIONS OF FEMALES IN CROSS‐SEX CONVERSATION * , 1979 .

[48]  Interaction analysis and the analysis of interactional organization , 1980 .

[49]  Aaron V. Cicourel,et al.  Three models of discourse analysis: The role of social structure∗ , 1980 .

[50]  Sally McConnell-Ginet,et al.  Women and Language in Literature and Society , 1980 .

[51]  E. Goffman,et al.  Forms of talk , 1982 .