Psycho-Motor and Error Enabled Simulations Modeling Vulnerable Skills in the Pre-Mastery Phase - Medical Practice Initiative Procedural Skill Decay and Maintenance (MPI-PSD)

Abstract : This term of the grant has been comprised of three main directions. The first primary direction focused on simulation preparation, personnel training, and conducting data collection sessions. Based on recommendations identified from pilot simulations, necessary modifications were made to each of the procedural stations. Next, the entire team traveled to the institutions involved in the study, set up all the simulation stations, interacted with participants, and collected data to bring back to the lab for analysis. The second direction of effort focused on the organization, database and transcription coding, and analysis of this data. Analysis was expedited using participant workbooks, common error checklists, and video recordings made during participant data collections. Additional data such as images of final products were obtained and coded. The third direction focused on the dissemination of findings learned in the initial analyses performed. The development of a Performance Review Tool had its initial completion and distribution to participants based off of the data that was collected. Multiple abstracts and posters were created for surgical conferences attended. These works concentrated on data from hernia port placements, perceptions of skill reduction, motor control in robotic tasks, and prevalence of rule-based errors. Lessons learned from each of the main directions have been incorporated into plans for additional refinements to be made that will ensure continuing study success for our upcoming second year of data collection sessions.

[1]  R. Reznick,et al.  Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents , 1997, The British journal of surgery.

[2]  Carla M Pugh,et al.  Idle time: an underdeveloped performance metric for assessing surgical skill. , 2015, American journal of surgery.

[3]  Rajesh Aggarwal,et al.  Synchronized video and motion analysis for the assessment of procedures in the operating theater. , 2005, Archives of surgery.

[4]  R. Reznick,et al.  Teaching the surgical craft: From selection to certification. , 2002, Current problems in surgery.

[5]  M. Schijven,et al.  Construct validity of the LapSim: Can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts? , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[6]  Carla Pugh,et al.  Outcome measures for surgical simulators: is the focus on technical skills the best approach? , 2010, Surgery.

[7]  D. Scott,et al.  Construct and face validity of MIST-VR, Endotower, and CELTS , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[8]  Michael K Gould,et al.  Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Sensitivity of Smoothness Measures to Movement Duration, Amplitude, and Arrests , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  Pablo Lamata,et al.  Methods and tools for objective assessment of psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery. , 2011, The Journal of surgical research.

[11]  V. Falk Manual control and tracking--a human factor analysis relevant for beating heart surgery. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  E. Brenner,et al.  Fast and fine-tuned corrections when the target of a hand movement is displaced , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  A. Darzi,et al.  Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomised controlled studies using the MIST VR laparoscopic simulator. , 1998, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[14]  P Dev,et al.  The effect of simulator use on learning and self-assessment: the case of Stanford University's E-Pelvis simulator. , 2001, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[15]  M. Pellen,et al.  Construct validity of the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[16]  A. Darzi,et al.  Relationship between skill and outcome in the laboratory-based model. , 2002, Surgery.

[17]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Laparoscopic skills training and assessment , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[18]  R. Reznick,et al.  Assessing competency in surgery: where to begin? , 2004, Surgery.

[19]  C. Pugh,et al.  The use of error analysis to assess resident performance. , 2015, Surgery.

[20]  C. Pugh,et al.  Use of decision-based simulations to assess resident readiness for operative independence. , 2015, American journal of surgery.