How do foragers decide when to leave a patch? A test of alternative models under natural and experimental conditions.

A forager's optimal patch-departure time can be predicted by the prescient marginal value theorem (pMVT), which assumes they have perfect knowledge of the environment, or by approaches such as Bayesian updating and learning rules, which avoid this assumption by allowing foragers to use recent experiences to inform their decisions. In understanding and predicting broader scale ecological patterns, individual-level mechanisms, such as patch-departure decisions, need to be fully elucidated. Unfortunately, there are few empirical studies that compare the performance of patch-departure models that assume perfect knowledge with those that do not, resulting in a limited understanding of how foragers decide when to leave a patch. We tested the patch-departure rules predicted by fixed rule, pMVT, Bayesian updating and learning models against one another, using patch residency times (PRTs) recorded from 54 chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) across two groups in natural (n = 6175 patch visits) and field experimental (n = 8569) conditions. We found greater support in the experiment for the model based on Bayesian updating rules, but greater support for the model based on the pMVT in natural foraging conditions. This suggests that foragers may place more importance on recent experiences in predictable environments, like our experiment, where these experiences provide more reliable information about future opportunities. Furthermore, the effect of a single recent foraging experience on PRTs was uniformly weak across both conditions. This suggests that foragers' perception of their environment may incorporate many previous experiences, thus approximating the perfect knowledge assumed by the pMVT. Foragers may, therefore, optimize their patch-departure decisions in line with the pMVT through the adoption of rules similar to those predicted by Bayesian updating.

[1]  Theunis Piersma,et al.  Incompletely Informed Shorebirds That Face a Digestive Constraint Maximize Net Energy Gain When Exploiting Patches , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Ola Olsson,et al.  Bayes' theorem and its applications in animal behaviour , 2006 .

[3]  Thomas J. Valone,et al.  Bayesian and prescient assessment: foraging with pre-harvest information , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  P. Nonacs.  State dependent behavior and the Marginal Value Theorem , 2001 .

[5]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  E. Charnov.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[7]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Optimal searching behaviour: the value of sampling information , 2002 .

[8]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Prey Distribution as a Factor Determining the Choice of Optimal Foraging Strategy , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[9]  Ola Olsson,et al.  The survival-rate-maximizing policy for Bayesian foragers: wait for good news , 1998 .

[10]  A. Oaten,et al.  Optimal foraging in patches: a case for stochasticity. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[11]  J. Alonso,et al.  Patch use in cranes: a field test of optimal foraging predictions , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  K. Laland,et al.  Reproductive state affects reliance on public information in sticklebacks , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Ola Olsson,et al.  A Three-Neuron Model of Information Processing During Bayesian Foraging , 2000, ANNIMAB.

[14]  M. Rodríguez-Gironés,et al.  Density-Dependent Patch Exploitation and Acquisition of Environmental Information , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[15]  Roderich Groß,et al.  Simple learning rules to cope with changing environments , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[16]  Richard F. Green,et al.  Stopping Rules for Optimal Foragers , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[17]  B. Grossi,et al.  On the value of information: studying changes in patch assessment abilities through learning , 2006 .

[18]  Guy Cowlishaw,et al.  Exploring Foraging Decisions in a Social Primate Using Discrete-Choice Models , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[19]  M. R. Evans,et al.  Modelling ecological systems in a changing world , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Foraging : behavior and ecology , 2007 .

[21]  Marten A Koops,et al.  Integrating the Roles of Information and Competitive Ability on the Spatial Distribution of Social Foragers , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[22]  C Arrowsmith,et al.  Analysis of aggregation, a worked example: numbers of ticks on red grouse chicks , 2001, Parasitology.

[23]  T. Valone,et al.  Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution , 2004, Science.

[24]  M. Symonds,et al.  A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[25]  Wolf M. Mooij,et al.  The use of a flexible patch leaving rule under exploitative competition: a field test with swans , 2006 .

[26]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Exposing the behavioral gambit: the evolution of learning and decision rules , 2013 .

[27]  T. Caraco,et al.  Social Foraging Theory , 2018 .

[28]  L. Devenport,et al.  Time-dependent averaging of foraging information in least chipmunks and golden-mantled ground squirrels , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  Marc Mangel,et al.  Quantifying the Adaptive Value of Learning in Foraging Behavior , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[30]  Ola Olsson,et al.  The foraging benefits of information and the penalty of ignorance , 2006 .

[31]  K. Laland,et al.  Social learning strategies and predation risk: minnows copy only when using private information would be costly , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Tatsuya Amano,et al.  DECISION-MAKING IN GROUP FORAGERS WITH INCOMPLETE INFORMATION: TEST OF INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL IN GEESE , 2006 .

[33]  B. Voelkl,et al.  Supply and demand determine the market value of food providers in wild vervet monkeys , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Guy Cowlishaw,et al.  More than friends? Behavioural and genetic aspects of heterosexual associations in wild chacma baboons , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[35]  Jinliang Wang,et al.  Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness. , 2007, Genetical research.

[36]  Thomas J. Valone,et al.  Are animals capable of Bayesian updating? An empirical review , 2006 .

[37]  J. Altmann,et al.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. , 1974, Behaviour.

[38]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Downy Woodpecker Foraging Behavior: Efficient Sampling in Simple Stochastic Environments , 1984 .

[39]  Guy Cowlishaw,et al.  Flora of the Pro-Namib Desert Swakop River Catchment, Namibia: community classification and implications for desert vegetation sampling , 1997 .

[40]  G. Beauchamp,et al.  Learning rules for social foragers: implications for the producer-scrounger game and ideal free distribution theory. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  Thomas J. Valone,et al.  Information for patch assessment: a field investigation with black-chinned hummingbirds , 1992 .

[42]  J. Biernaskie,et al.  Bumblebees Learn to Forage like Bayesians , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[43]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[44]  Thomas J. Valone,et al.  Measuring Patch Assessment Abilities of Desert Granivores , 1989 .

[45]  R. H. Smith,et al.  BEHAVIOURAL ECOLOGY ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOUR , 2007 .

[46]  Luc-Alain Giraldeau,et al.  Finding the evolutionarily stable learning rule for frequency-dependent foraging , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  Guy Cowlishaw,et al.  Vulnerability to predation in baboon populations , 1994 .

[48]  Jennifer J. Templeton,et al.  Patch assessment in foraging flocks of European starlings: evidence for the use of public information , 1995 .