A critical evaluation of gestural stiffness estimations in speech production based on a linear second-order model.

PURPOSE Linear second-order models have often been used to investigate properties of speech production. However, these models are inaccurate approximations of the speech apparatus. This study aims at assessing how reliably stiffness can be estimated from kinematics with these models. METHOD Articulatory movements were collected for 9 speakers of German during the production of reiterant CVCV words at varying speech rates. Velocity peaks, movement amplitudes, and gesture durations were measured. In the context of an undamped model, 2 stiffness estimations were compared that should theoretically yield the same result. In the context of a damped model, gestural stiffness and damping were calculated for each gesture. RESULTS Numerous cases were found in which stiffness estimations based on the undamped model contradicted each other. Less than 80% of the data were found to be compatible with the properties of the damped model. Stiffness tends to decrease with gestural duration. However, it is associated with a large, unrealistic damping dispersion, making stiffness estimations from kinematic data to a large extent unreliable. CONCLUSION Any conclusions about speech control based on stiffness estimations using linear second-order models should therefore be considered with caution.

[1]  D. Ostry,et al.  Voluntary control of human jaw stiffness. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  J. Perkell,et al.  Economy of effort in different speaking conditions. I. A preliminary study of intersubject differences and modeling issues. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Muscles, Reflexes, and Locomotion , 1984 .

[4]  Pascal H H M van Lieshout,et al.  Speech motor control in fluent and dysfluent speech production of an individual with apraxia of speech and Broca's aphasia , 2007, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[5]  V Luboz,et al.  Non-linear elastic properties of the lingual and facial tissues assessed by indentation technique. Application to the biomechanics of speech production. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  J. Kelso,et al.  A qualitative dynamic analysis of reiterant speech production: phase portraits, kinematics, and dynamic modeling. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Sherman Wilcox,et al.  Dynamic Modeling of Phonetic Structure , 1992 .

[8]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Gestural specification using dynamically-defined articulatory structures , 1990 .

[9]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Representation and reality: physical systems and phonological structure , 1990 .

[10]  Jean-Luc Schwartz,et al.  An articulatory basis for the labial-to-coronal effect: /pata/ seems a more stable articulatory pattern than /tapa/. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  H. Ackermann,et al.  Kinematic analysis of lower lip movements in ataxic dysarthria. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  P. Hoole,et al.  Speaker‐specific kinematic properties of alveolar reductions in English and German , 2004, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[13]  Hiroaki Gomi,et al.  Compensatory articulation during bilabial fricative production by regulating muscle stiffness , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[14]  Elliot Saltzman,et al.  Task Dynamic Coordination of the Speech Articulators: A Preliminary Model , 1986 .

[15]  Yi Xu,et al.  Organizing syllables into groups - Evidence from F0 and duration patterns in Mandarin , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[16]  D. Ostry,et al.  Control of rate and duration of speech movements. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  L Saltzman Elliot,et al.  A Dynamical Approach to Gestural Patterning in Speech Production , 1989 .