Chronicling a successful secondary implementation of Studio Physics

The Colorado School of Mines (CSM) has taught its first-semester calculus-based introductory physics course (Physics I) using a hybrid lecture/Studio Physics format since the spring of 1997. Starting in the fall of 2007, we have been converting the second semester of our calculus-based introductory physics course (Physics II) to a hybrid lecture/Studio Physics format, beginning from a traditional lecture/lab/recitation course. In this paper, we document the stages of this transformation, highlighting what has worked and what has not, and the challenges and benefits associated with the switch to Studio Physics. A major goal in this study is to develop a method for secondary implementations of Studio physics that keeps the time and resource investments manageable. We describe the history of Studio at CSM and characterize our progress via several metrics, including pre/post Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism (CSEM) scores, Colorado Learning About Science Survey scores (CLASS), exam scores, failur...

[1]  C. E. Wieman,et al.  AIP Conference Proceedings: Exploring Student Understanding of Energy through the Quantum Mechanics Conceptual Survey , 2006 .

[2]  Steven J. Pollock,et al.  Replicating and understanding successful innovations: Implementing tutorials in introductory physics , 2005 .

[3]  Steven J. Pollock,et al.  Comparing student learning with multiple research-based conceptual surveys: CSEM and BEMA. , 2008 .

[4]  Noah S. Podolefsky,et al.  New Instrument for Measuring Student Beliefs about Physics and Learning Physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. , 2006 .

[5]  Thomas E. Furtak,et al.  Installing studio physics , 2001 .

[6]  C. Wieman,et al.  PhET: Interactive Simulations for Teaching and Learning Physics , 2006 .

[7]  Steven J. Pollock,et al.  A physics department’s role in preparing physics teachers: The Colorado learning assistant model , 2010 .

[8]  David P Maloney,et al.  Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism , 2001 .

[9]  Patricia A. Heller,et al.  Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups , 1992 .

[10]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  How Does Technology-Enabled Active Learning Affect Undergraduate Students' Understanding of Electromagnetism Concepts? , 2005 .

[11]  Peter Gustafsson,et al.  From Everyday Life Experiences to Physics Understanding Occurring in Small Group Work with Context Rich Problems During Introductory Physics Work at University , 2007 .

[12]  Lauren E. Kost,et al.  Characterizing the gender gap in introductory physics , 2009 .

[13]  L. D. Carr,et al.  Graduate quantum mechanics reform , 2008, 0806.2628.

[14]  Patrick B. Kohl,et al.  Introductory Physics Gender Gaps: Pre- and Post-Studio Transition , 2009 .

[15]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[16]  Jack M. Wilson.  The CUPLE physics studio , 1994 .

[17]  Patrick B. Kohl,et al.  Direct and Indirect Approaches to Increasing Conceptual Survey Gains , 2010 .

[18]  Catherine H. Crouch,et al.  Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom , 2006 .

[19]  Dean Zollman,et al.  The New Studio format for instruction of introductory physics , 2006 .

[20]  J. Sweller,et al.  Structuring Effective Worked Examples , 1990 .

[21]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[22]  Matthew J. Moelter,et al.  The implications of a robust curriculum in introductory mechanics , 2011 .

[23]  Jeffery M. Saul,et al.  Student expectations in introductory physics , 1998 .

[24]  N. Sanjay Rebello,et al.  Studio optics: Adapting interactive engagement pedagogy to upper-division physics , 2011 .

[25]  D. Hestenes.  Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction , 1987 .

[26]  Luke Campagnola,et al.  Tablet Computers Used For Teaching And Real Time Assessment Of Conceptual Understanding Of Engineering Students , 2005 .

[27]  R. D. Knight,et al.  A direct comparison of conceptual learning and problem solving ability in traditional and studio style classrooms , 2005 .

[28]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[29]  D. Sokoloff,et al.  Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment , 1997 .