Characterizing anatomical variability in breast CT images.
暂无分享,去创建一个
John M Boone | Craig K Abbey | Kathrine G. Metheany | J. Boone | C. Abbey | N. Packard | Kathrine G Metheany | Nathan Packard
[1] J. Wolfe,et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[2] T R Nelson,et al. A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography. , 2004, Medical physics.
[3] Arthur E Burgess,et al. Signal detection in power-law noise: effect of spectrum exponents. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[4] John M. Boone,et al. Computed Tomography for Imaging the Breast , 2006, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.
[5] A Fenster,et al. Dual-energy mammography: initial experimental results. , 1985, Medical physics.
[6] M P Eckstein,et al. Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. IV. Figures of merit for model performance in multiple-alternative forced-choice detection tasks with correlated responses. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[7] Arthur E. Burgess,et al. Mammographic structure: data preparation and spatial statistics analysis , 1999, Medical Imaging.
[8] J. Boone,et al. Evaluation of the spatial resolution characteristics of a cone-beam breast CT scanner. , 2006, Medical physics.
[9] B. F. Logan,et al. The Fourier reconstruction of a head section , 1974 .
[10] H. Kundel,et al. Lesion conspicuity, structured noise, and film reader error. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[11] John J Heine,et al. Spectral analysis of full field digital mammography data. , 2002, Medical physics.
[12] F R Verdun,et al. Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. , 1999, Medical physics.
[13] Mats Danielsson,et al. Single-shot dual-energy subtraction mammography with electronic spectrum splitting: feasibility. , 2006, European journal of radiology.
[14] John M Lewin,et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. , 2003, Radiology.
[15] A. Burgess,et al. Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.
[16] J. Boone,et al. Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. , 2008, Radiology.
[17] K. Rajgopal,et al. Two-Dimensional Spectral Estimation: A Radon Transform Approach , 1987 .
[18] Walter Huda,et al. How do lesion size and random noise affect detection performance in digital mammography? , 2006, Academic radiology.
[19] Y H Chang,et al. Adaptive computer-aided diagnosis scheme of digitized mammograms. , 1996, Academic radiology.
[20] John M Boone,et al. Classification of breast computed tomography data. , 2008, Medical physics.
[21] B. Logan,et al. Reconstructing Interior Head Tissue from X-Ray Transmissions , 1974 .
[22] G T Barnes,et al. An energy sensitive cassette for dual-energy mammography. , 1989, Medical physics.
[23] Harrison H Barrett,et al. Figures of merit for detectors in digital radiography. I. Flat background and deterministic blurring. , 2004, Medical physics.
[24] H H Barrett,et al. Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[25] J. Boone,et al. Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation. , 2001, Radiology.
[26] J. Heine,et al. Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Part 2. Serial breast tissue change and related temporal influences. , 2002, Academic radiology.
[27] John M Boone,et al. Breast CT: potential for breast cancer screening and diagnosis. , 2006, Future oncology.
[28] Jennifer A Harvey,et al. Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. , 2004, Radiology.