Interfirm Relationships in the Supply Chain: The Small Supplier’s View

Abstract The need for global market presence, the complexity of new product development, and the emphasis on core competence are making alliances among firms more important, and recent evidence suggests that these issues are affecting small suppliers as well as the large firms that are their customers. This paper studied the relationship orientation (i.e., the perceived importance, of interfirm relations) in a fragmented supplier industry whose single largest customer group is automotive OEMs. The primary objective of the research was the identification of factors that discriminate between firms with high and low relationship orientations. The study found four factors describing benefits and barriers associated with interfirm relationships, and found that firms with a high relationship orientation were smaller and more optimistic about the industry’s ability to support a greater number of firms in the future, and perceived faster technology change than firms with a low relationship orientation.

[1]  K. R. Harrigan.  Joint ventures and competitive strategy , 1988 .

[2]  R. Kanter.  Collaborative advantage: The art of alliances , 1994 .

[3]  Ji Mohr,et al.  Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior and conflict resolution technique, Strategic Management Journal, January, . , 1994 .

[4]  Paul Alpar,et al.  Response Behavior of Entrepreneurs in a Mail Survey , 1990 .

[5]  Leonid V. Azároff,et al.  Industry-University Collaboration : How to Make It work : Research Management , 1982 .

[6]  G. Devlin,et al.  Strategic alliances—Guidelines for success , 1988 .

[7]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing , 1994 .

[8]  Charles R. O'Neal,et al.  JIT procurement and relationship marketing , 1989 .

[9]  Barry Wilkinson,et al.  Buyer-supplier relations in the UK - automotive industry: Strategic implications of the Japanese manufacturing model , 1992 .

[10]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques , 1994 .

[11]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Dyadic Business Relationships within a Business Network Context , 1994 .

[12]  R. Osborn,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Design. Vol. 1: Adapting Organizations to Their Environments. , 1982 .

[13]  J. Hagedoorn.  Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences , 1993 .

[14]  D. Lei.  Offensive and defensive uses of alliances , 1993 .

[15]  Barbara W. Keats,et al.  A Causal Model of Linkages Among Environmental Dimensions, Macro Organizational Characteristics, and Performance , 1988 .

[16]  Marc J. Dollinger,et al.  The Evolution of Collective Strategies in Fragmented Industries , 1990 .

[17]  Lars Hakanson.  R&D based cooperative ventures , 1991 .

[18]  Paul D. Ballew,et al.  Realignment in the auto supplier industry: the rippling effects of Big Three restructuring , 1994 .

[19]  N. KhandwallaP.  Properties of Competing Organizations , 1976 .

[20]  Marc J. Dollinger,et al.  Interorganizational and Collective Strategies in Small Firms: Environmental Effects and Performance , 1992 .

[21]  F. Webster.  The Changing Role of Marketing in the Corporation , 1992 .

[22]  Robert D. Laurent,et al.  Is there a role for gold in monetary policy , 1994 .

[23]  M. Dertouzos,et al.  Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge , 1989 .

[24]  K. R. Harrigan.  Strategies for joint ventures , 1985 .

[25]  P. Lorange,et al.  Strategic Alliances: Formation, Implementation, and Evolution , 1992 .

[26]  C. Hill,et al.  A theory of global strategic alliances: The case of the global auto industry , 1993 .