Spotting East African Mammals in Open Savannah from Space

Knowledge of population dynamics is essential for managing and conserving wildlife. Traditional methods of counting wild animals such as aerial survey or ground counts not only disturb animals, but also can be labour intensive and costly. New, commercially available very high-resolution satellite images offer great potential for accurate estimates of animal abundance over large open areas. However, little research has been conducted in the area of satellite-aided wildlife census, although computer processing speeds and image analysis algorithms have vastly improved. This paper explores the possibility of detecting large animals in the open savannah of Maasai Mara National Reserve, Kenya from very high-resolution GeoEye-1 satellite images. A hybrid image classification method was employed for this specific purpose by incorporating the advantages of both pixel-based and object-based image classification approaches. This was performed in two steps: firstly, a pixel-based image classification method, i.e., artificial neural network was applied to classify potential targets with similar spectral reflectance at pixel level; and then an object-based image classification method was used to further differentiate animal targets from the surrounding landscapes through the applications of expert knowledge. As a result, the large animals in two pilot study areas were successfully detected with an average count error of 8.2%, omission error of 6.6% and commission error of 13.7%. The results of the study show for the first time that it is feasible to perform automated detection and counting of large wild animals in open savannahs from space, and therefore provide a complementary and alternative approach to the conventional wildlife survey techniques.

[1]  Fan Xia,et al.  Assessing object-based classification: advantages and limitations , 2009 .

[2]  Alfred Stein,et al.  Improved sampling of wildlife populations using airborne surveys , 2002 .

[3]  T. O'Brien Wildlife picture index and biodiversity monitoring: issues and future directions , 2010 .

[4]  R. L. Knight,et al.  WILDLIFE RESPONSES TO RECREATION AND ASSOCIATED VISITOR PERCEPTIONS , 2003 .

[5]  Henk J. Busscher,et al.  Application of an artificial neural network in the enumeration of yeasts and bacteria adhering to solid substrata , 1998 .

[6]  D. Macdonald New encyclopedia of mammals , 2001 .

[7]  Andrea S. Laliberte,et al.  Automated wildlife counts from remotely sensed imagery , 2003 .

[8]  J. Tracey,et al.  Some human, aircraft and animal factors affecting aerial surveys: how to enumerate animals from the air , 2008 .

[9]  R. Hudson,et al.  Herbivore Dynamics in Southern Narok, Kenya , 1986 .

[10]  J. Ogutu,et al.  Continuing wildlife population declines and range contraction in the Mara region of Kenya during 1977-2009 , 2011 .

[11]  B. Johnson,et al.  Assessing aerial survey methods to estimate elk populations: a case study. , 2000 .

[12]  Gerald L. Kooyman,et al.  An Emperor Penguin Population Estimate: The First Global, Synoptic Survey of a Species from Space , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  R. Lanctot,et al.  A line transect model for aerial surveys , 1991 .

[14]  Simon N. Stuart,et al.  Wildlife in a changing world , 2009 .

[15]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[16]  S. Stuart,et al.  Wildlife in a changing world : an analysis of the 2008 IUCN red list of threatened species , 2009 .

[17]  Curt H. Davis,et al.  Vehicle detection from high-resolution satellite imagery using morphological shared-weight neural networks , 2007, Image Vis. Comput..

[18]  Karsten Jacobsen,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF VERY HIGH RESOLUTION OPTICAL SATELLITES FOR TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING , 2012 .

[19]  W. H. Anderson,et al.  An image-processing program for automated counting , 1996 .

[20]  Hari Babu Srivastava,et al.  Image Pre-processing Algorithms for Detection of Small/Point Airborne Targets , 2009 .

[21]  Peter J. Edwards,et al.  The value of biodiversity : Where ecology and economy blend , 1998 .

[22]  Xia Li,et al.  A novel algorithm for land use and land cover classification using RADARSAT-2 polarimetric SAR data , 2012 .

[23]  Seema Jalan,et al.  Comparison of different pan-sharpening methods for spectral characteristic preservation: multi-temporal CARTOSAT-1 and IRS-P6 LISS-IV imagery , 2012 .

[24]  Zhang Xiangmin,et al.  Comparison of pixel‐based and object‐oriented image classification approaches—a case study in a coal fire area, Wuda, Inner Mongolia, China , 2006 .

[25]  C. Pond,et al.  Walker's Mammals of the World, 4th Edition, Ronald M. Nowak, John L. Paradiso. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland (1983), 1xi, +1-568 (Vol. I), xxv+569-1362 (Vol. II). Price $65.00 , 1984 .

[26]  John F. Piatt,et al.  COMPUTER-AIDED PROCEDURE FOR COUNTING WATERFOWL ON AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS , 1990 .

[27]  Luyao Huang,et al.  Object-Oriented Classification of High Resolution Satellite Image for Better Accuracy , 2008 .

[28]  L. J. Anthony The New Encyclopedia of Mammals , 2002 .

[29]  Xiao-yun Zhuang,et al.  Data fusion of satellite remotely sensed images and its application in agriculture , 2011, International Conference on Photonics and Image in Agriculture Engineering.

[30]  J. Leeuw,et al.  Application of remote sensing and geographic information systems in wildlife mapping and modelling , 2002 .

[31]  A. Sinclair,et al.  Can parks protect migratory ungulates? The case of the Serengeti wildebeest , 2004 .

[32]  B. Turner,et al.  Performance of a neural network: mapping forests using GIS and remotely sensed data , 1997 .

[33]  E. O. Garton,et al.  Estimation of wildlife population ratios incorporating survey design and visibility bias , 1992 .

[34]  Ruiliang Pu,et al.  Object-based urban detailed land cover classification with high spatial resolution IKONOS imagery , 2011 .

[35]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Neural Network Approaches Versus Statistical Methods in Classification of Multisource Remote Sensing Data , 1989, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,.

[36]  F. D. van der Meer,et al.  Shape-based classification of spectrally identical objects , 2008 .

[37]  A. Rango,et al.  Object-oriented image analysis for mapping shrub encroachment from 1937 to 2003 in southern New Mexico , 2004 .

[38]  J. Leeuw,et al.  Population trends of resident wildebeest - Connochaetes taurinus hecki - Neumann - and factors influencing them in the Masai Mara ecosystem, Kenya , 2001 .

[39]  K. Navulur Multispectral Image Analysis Using the Object-Oriented Paradigm , 2006 .

[40]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction , 1999 .

[41]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Statistical Evaluation of Remotely Sensed Thermal Data for Deer Census , 1980 .

[42]  C Kong Classification and Extraction of Urban Land-Use Information from High-Resolution Image Based on Object Multi-features , 2006 .

[43]  David S. Gilmer,et al.  Goose counts from aerial photographs using an optical digitizer , 1988 .

[44]  H. Jachmann Comparison of aerial counts with ground counts for large African herbivores , 2002 .

[45]  R. Reid,et al.  Expansion of human settlement in Kenya's Maasai Mara: what future for pastoralism and wildlife? , 2004 .