Age-related differences in prehension: the influence of task goals.

A single study is reported in which the influence of age and task goal on reaching and grasping movements were examined. Ten young and 10 elderly subjects reached and grasped a disk (4.5-cm diameter) and then either (a) placed it in a well, (b) placed It in a box, or (c) threw it in a box, all located 30 cm to the left of the disk. The reach-to-grasp movements were analyzed over two phases: the approach to capture the disk and the transporting of the disk. Differential effects were observed over the two phases as a function of age. Over the approach, the movement times of the elderly subjects were comparable with those of the young subjects, but their relative deceleration and hand enclosing times took longer. During object transport, however, the elderly subjects moved more slowly than the young subjects did, but there were no differences in relative timing. In both phases, the precision required of the task influenced the duration of movement and the relative timing of arm deceleration, suggesting that subjects accurately anticipated the demands of the task. Those results, which are discussed in relation to hardware and software limitations on performance, suggest that the age-related differences reflect changes in the use of software strategies over the two phases of movement.

[1]  Eric A. Roy,et al.  Constraints on Prehension: A Framework for Studying the Effects of Aging , 1996 .

[2]  U. Castiello,et al.  Reorganization of prehension components following perturbation of object size. , 1995, Psychology and aging.

[3]  J. Pratt,et al.  Rapid aimed limb movements: age differences and practice effects in component submovements. , 1994, Psychology and aging.

[4]  U Castiello,et al.  Reach to grasp: changes with age. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[5]  J W Grice,et al.  Effects of aging on planning and implementing arm movements. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[6]  N L Goggin,et al.  Age-related differences in the control of spatial aiming movements. , 1992, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[7]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Does the type of prehension influence the kinematics of reaching , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[8]  L M Shiffman,et al.  Effects of aging on adult hand function. , 1992, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[9]  Health screening and random recruitment for cognitive aging research. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[10]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Age differences in the maintenance and restructuring of movement preparation. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[12]  George E. Stelmach,et al.  5 Age-Related Deficits in Cognitive-Motor Skills , 1990 .

[13]  J. Cooke,et al.  Kinematics of arm movements in elderly humans , 1989, Neurobiology of Aging.

[14]  J. Cooke,et al.  Control of simple arm movements in elderly humans , 1989, Neurobiology of Aging.

[15]  A. Welford,et al.  Reaction Time, Speed of Performance, and Age , 1988, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[16]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Aging and the restructuring of precued movements. , 1988, Psychology and aging.

[17]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  Three-Dimensional Movement Trajectories in Fitts' Task: Implications for Control , 1987 .

[18]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[19]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Movement specification time with age. , 1987, Experimental Aging Research.

[20]  A. Wing,et al.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[21]  H. Noda,et al.  Effect of aging on sensorimotor functions of eye and hand movements , 1986, Experimental Neurology.

[22]  T. Salthouse.  Speed of behavior and its implications for cog-nition , 1985 .

[23]  A T Welford,et al.  Psychomotor Performance , 1984, Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics.

[24]  J. Botwinick.  Aging and Behavior , 1984, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[25]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Preprogramming, programming and reprogramming of aimed hand movements as a function of age. , 1982, Journal of motor behavior.

[26]  Mark E. Williams,et al.  Manual ability as a marker of dependency in geriatric women. , 1982, Journal of chronic diseases.

[27]  D. Winter.  Biomechanics of Human Movement , 1980 .

[28]  P. Rabbitt.  How old and young subjects monitor and control responses for accuracy and speed , 1979 .

[29]  W. Spirduso.  Reaction and movement time as a function of age and physical activity level. , 1975, Journal of gerontology.

[30]  K. Murrell,et al.  Age Differences in Movement Pattern , 1960, Nature.