Knowledge sharing among Malaysian academics: Influence of affective commitment and trust

Knowledge resides within a human being and it is hard to be transferred to others. Unwillingness to share is one of the main impediments of knowledge sharing. In a university setting, this situation could be more alarming as universities are knowledge centric organisation. Knowledge sharing will help universities to strengthen its research and teaching activities. Despite the importance of knowledge sharing, many academics still hoard their knowledge. The aims for this paper are (1) to evaluate the influence of these two emotional factors towards knowledge sharing intention; (2) to examine whether the perception of knowledge sharing in public universities differs from private universities. The research model includes the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and the two affective components. In order to examine the research model, a survey was conducted with a total respondent of 545 academics from 30 universities in Malaysia. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the research model. On the other hand, t-test was used to examine the differences between public and private universities. In general, the findings revealed that emotional influence is crucial for knowledge sharing behaviour. The t-test analysis shows that there are significant differences between public and private universities. This paper contributes to the existing literature by evaluating the impact of emotional factors (affective commitment and affective trust) towards knowledge sharing behaviour. It also provides a greater depth of understanding on how knowledge sharing in public universities deviate from private universities. University administrators need to implement policies and activities to strengthen the emotional bonding between academics in order to facilitate knowledge sharing in Malaysian universities. This is exceptionally crucial for private universities as the results shows that knowledge sharing intention is lower than the public universities.

[1]  John P. Girard,et al.  Where is the knowledge we have lost in managers? , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[2]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[3]  Daniel J. McAllister.  Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[4]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward A Theory of Knowledge Reuse : Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success , 2022 .

[5]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  A comparison of public and private sector perceptions and use of knowledge management , 2000 .

[6]  Ramón Valle-Cabrera,et al.  The influence of human resource management on knowledge sharing and innovation in Spain: the mediating role of affective commitment , 2011 .

[7]  J. Lewis,et al.  Trust as a Social Reality , 1985 .

[8]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[9]  Narasimha Bolloju,et al.  Explaining the intentions to share and reuse knowledge in the context of IT service operations , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[10]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Encouraging Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Organizational Reward Systems , 2002 .

[11]  Feng-Yang Kuo,et al.  A study of the intention–action gap in knowledge sharing practices , 2008 .

[12]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[13]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[14]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[15]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[16]  R. McQueen,et al.  Capturing leadership tacit knowledge in conversations with leaders , 2007 .

[17]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Exploring Perceptions of Organizational Ownership of Information and Expertise , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  M. Ipe.  Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework , 2003 .

[19]  Feng-Yang Kuo,et al.  A study of the intention-action gap in knowledge sharing practices , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Trust in close relationships. , 1985 .

[21]  Robert S. Dooley,et al.  The relationship between conflict and decision outcomes: Moderating effects of cognitive‐ and affect‐based trust in strategic decision‐making teams , 2007 .

[22]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Chieh-Peng Lin.  To share or not to share: modeling knowledge sharing using exchange ideology as a moderator , 2007 .

[24]  George Stonehouse,et al.  Knowledge management in the Chinese public sector: empirical investigation , 2007 .

[25]  J. Schaubroeck,et al.  Beyond the Call of Duty: A Field Study of Extra-Role Behavior in Voluntary Organizations , 1991 .

[26]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[27]  Ingoo Han,et al.  Knowledge sharing behavior of physicians in hospitals , 2003, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  Chun-Ming Chang,et al.  Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[29]  John P. Meyer,et al.  AFFECTIVE, CONTINUANCE, AND NORMATIVE COMMITMENT TO THE ORGANIZATION: A META-ANALYSIS OF ANTECEDENTS, CORRELATES, AND CONSEQUENCES , 2002 .

[30]  S. Chowdhury,et al.  The role of affect- and cognition-based trust in complex knowledge sharing. , 2005 .

[31]  Bart van den Hooff,et al.  Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing , 2004, J. Knowl. Manag..

[32]  John P. Meyer,et al.  The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization , 1990 .

[33]  M. Sandhu,et al.  Knowledge sharing among public sector employees: evidence from Malaysia , 2011 .

[34]  J. Barney,et al.  Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage , 1994 .

[35]  W. Kim,et al.  Fair process: managing in the knowledge economy. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[36]  Zuopeng Zhang,et al.  Knowledge markets in firms: knowledge sharing with trust and signalling , 2010 .

[37]  Hsiu-Fen Lin.  Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study , 2007 .

[38]  John C. Thomas,et al.  The knowledge management puzzle: Human and social factors in knowledge management , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[39]  Kim Seonghee,et al.  An analysis of faculty perceptions: Attitudes toward knowledge sharing and collaboration in an academic institution , 2008 .

[40]  Angel Cabrera,et al.  Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing , 2006 .

[41]  Jacqueline A-M. Coyle-Shapiro,et al.  Consequences of the psychological contract for the employment relationship: a large scale survey , 2000 .

[42]  Gwo-Guang Lee,et al.  Perceptions of senior managers toward knowledge‐sharing behaviour , 2004 .

[43]  Jixia Yang,et al.  Supervisory procedural justice effects: The mediating roles of cognitive and affective trust , 2009 .

[44]  Manjit Singh Sandhu,et al.  Knowledge Sharing Among Academic Staff: A Case Study of Business Schools in Klang Valley, Malaysia , 2007 .

[45]  D. Hislop.  Linking human resource management and knowledge management via commitment: A review and research agenda , 2003 .

[46]  W ZmudRobert,et al.  Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing , 2005 .