Toward Characterizing the Productivity Benefits of Very Large Displays

Larger display surfaces are becoming increasingly available due to multi-monitor capability built into many systems, in addition to the rapid decrease in their costs. However, little is known about the performance benefits of using these larger surfaces compared to traditional single-monitor displays. In addition, it is not clear that current software designs and interaction techniques have been properly tuned for these larger surfaces. A preliminary user study was carried out to provide some initial evidence about the benefits of large versus small display surfaces for complex, multi-application office work. Significant benefits were observed in the use of a prototype, larger display, in addition to significant positive user preference and satisfaction with its use over a small display. In addition, design guidelines for enhancing user interaction across large display surfaces were identified. User productivity could be significantly enhanced in future graphical user interface designs if developed with these findings in mind.

[1]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  The effects of display size and text splitting on reading lengthy text from screen , 1990 .

[2]  William Buxton,et al.  Issues in combining marking and direct manipulation techniques , 1991, UIST '91.

[3]  John C. Tang,et al.  Liveboard: a large interactive display supporting group meetings, presentations, and remote collaboration , 1992, CHI.

[4]  Herre van Oostendorp,et al.  The influence of screen size and text layout on the study of text , 1992 .

[5]  F. Halasz,et al.  Tivoli: an electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings , 1993, INTERCHI.

[6]  Kimiya Yamaashi,et al.  Courtyard: integrating shared overview on a large screen and per-user detail on individual screens , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[7]  S. H. Sato,et al.  Interaction design for large displays , 1997, INTR.

[8]  Richard Furuta,et al.  Skimming electronic newspaper headlines: a study of typeface, point size, screen resolution, and monitor size , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[9]  Carolyn M. Sommerich,et al.  Effects of VDT Viewing Angle on User Biomechanics, Comfort, and Preference , 1998 .

[10]  Jun Rekimoto,et al.  A multiple device approach for supporting whiteboard-based interactions , 1998, CHI.

[11]  Jörg Geißler Shuffle, throw or take it! working efficiently with an interactive wall , 1998, CHI Conference Summary.

[12]  Kurt Dauer Keller The Usability of a Computer-based Work System , 1999, INTERACT.

[13]  Jennifer Ann Rode,et al.  Using a large projection screen as an alternative to head-mounted displays for virtual environments , 2000, CHI.

[14]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Exploring 3D navigation: combining speed-coupled flying with orbiting , 2001, CHI.

[15]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Partitioning digital worlds: focal and peripheral awareness in multiple monitor use , 2001, CHI.

[16]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Fluid interaction with high-resolution wall-size displays , 2001, UIST '01.

[17]  Patrick Baudisch,et al.  Keeping things in context: a comparative evaluation of focus plus context screens, overviews, and zooming , 2002, CHI.

[18]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Women take a wider view , 2002, CHI.