TANVEER: Tri-Angular Nearest Vector-Based Energy Efficient Routing for IoT-Enabled Acoustic Sensor and Actor Networks (I-ASANs)

The Internet of Things (IoT) is an emerging technology in underwater communication because of its potential to monitor underwater activities. IoT devices enable a variety of applications such as submarine and navy defense systems, pre-disaster prevention, and gas/oil exploration in deep and shallow water. The IoT devices have limited power due to their size. Many routing protocols have been proposed in applications, as mentioned above, in different aspects, but timely action and energy make these a challenging task for marine research. Therefore, this research presents a routing technique with three sub-sections, Tri-Angular Nearest Vector-Based Energy Efficient Routing (TANVEER): Layer-Based Adjustment (LBA-TANVEER), Data Packet Delivery (DPD-TANVEER), and Binary Inter Nodes (BIN-TANVEER). In TANVEER, the path is selected between the source node and sonobuoys by computing the angle three times with horizontal, vertical, and diagonal directions by using the nearest vector-based approach to avoid the empty nodes/region. In order to deploy the nodes, the LBA-TANVEER is used. Furthermore, for successful data delivery, the DPD-TANVEER is responsible for bypassing any empty nodes/region occurrence. BIN-TANVEER works with new watchman nodes that play an essential role in the path/data shifting mechanism. Moreover, achievable empty regions are also calculated by linear programming to minimize energy consumption and throughput maximization. Different evaluation parameters perform extensive simulation, and the coverage area of the proposed scheme is also presented. The simulated results show that the proposed technique outperforms the compared baseline scheme layer-by-layer angle-based flooding (L2-ABF) in terms of energy, throughput, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) and a fraction of empty regions.

[1]  Nauman Aslam,et al.  Void Avoidance Opportunistic Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks , 2021, Sensors.

[2]  Lei Shu,et al.  E-CARP: An Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for UWSNs in the Internet of Underwater Things , 2016, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[3]  Yang Xu,et al.  Application of Wireless Sensor Network in Water Quality Monitoring , 2017, 22017 IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) and IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (EUC).

[4]  N Ganesh,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Depth Adjustment and Void Aware Pressure Routing (DA-VAPR) Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks , 2019, Comput. J..

[5]  Yue Cao,et al.  Routing Challenges and Associated protocols in Acoustic Communication , 2018 .

[6]  Chenn-Jung Huang,et al.  A power-efficient routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[7]  Ali Abdi,et al.  IEEE Access Special Section Editorial: Underwater Wireless Communications and Networking , 2019, IEEE Access.

[8]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Cellular Clustering-Based Interference-Aware Data Transmission Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[9]  Umar Draz,et al.  Cloud Based Watchman Inlets for Flood Recovery System Using Wireless Sensor and Actor Networks , 2018, 2018 IEEE 21st International Multi-Topic Conference (INMIC).

[10]  Sandra Sendra,et al.  Underwater Wireless Ad Hoc Networks: A Survey , 2016 .

[11]  Azzedine Boukerche,et al.  Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks , 2018, ACM Comput. Surv..

[12]  Umar Draz,et al.  Towards Formal Modeling of Subnet Based Hotspot Algorithm in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2019, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[13]  Muhammad Imran,et al.  Co-EEORS: Cooperative Energy Efficient Optimal Relay Selection Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks , 2018, IEEE Access.

[14]  Antonio Alfredo Ferreira Loureiro,et al.  DCR: Depth-Controlled Routing protocol for underwater sensor networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC).

[15]  Peng Xie,et al.  Void Avoidance in Three-Dimensional Mobile Underwater Sensor Networks , 2009, WASA.

[16]  Hafizah Harun,et al.  Energy Efficient Opportunistic Routing Protocol (EE-OR) for Underwater Wireless Sensor Network , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[17]  S. Selvan,et al.  Energy Efficient Energy Hole Repelling (EEEHR) Algorithm for Delay Tolerant Wireless Sensor Network , 2018, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[18]  Low Tang Jung,et al.  Three hops reliability model for Underwater Wireless Sensor Network , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS).

[19]  Tariq Ali Delay efficient Layer by Layer Angle Based Flooding Protocol ( L 2-ABF ) for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks , 2012 .

[20]  Nadeem Javaid,et al.  QL-EEBDG: QLearning based energy balanced routing in underwater sensor networks , 2018, EAI Endorsed Trans. Energy Web.

[21]  Ibrahima Faye,et al.  Hop-by-Hop Reliable Data Deliveries for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Broadband, Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications.

[22]  Chien-Chi Kao,et al.  Internet of underwater things: Challenges and routing protocols , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Invention (ICASI).

[23]  Ju Liu,et al.  Design of optical-acoustic hybrid underwater wireless sensor network , 2017, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[24]  Umar Draz,et al.  EADSA: Energy-Aware Distributed Sink Algorithm for Hotspot Problem in Wireless Sensor and Actor Networks , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Engineering and Emerging Technologies (ICEET).

[25]  Yuhan Dong,et al.  A Survey of Underwater Optical Wireless Communications , 2017, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[26]  Zhigang Jin,et al.  An Evidence Theory Based Opportunistic Routing Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2018, IEEE Access.

[27]  Mohd Murtadha Mohamad,et al.  Greedy Routing in Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks: A Survey , 2013, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[28]  Umar Draz,et al.  A Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Two Novel Underwater Routing Protocols , 2019 .

[29]  Azlina Kamaruddin,et al.  An energy efficient void avoidance opportunistic routing protocol for underwater sensor , 2019, TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control).

[30]  Fatma Bouabdallah,et al.  A Survey on Routing Protocols for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks , 2017 .

[31]  A. Gkikopouli,et al.  A survey on Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks and applications , 2012, 2012 20th Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation (MED).

[32]  Low Tang Jung,et al.  Diagonal and Vertical Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Network , 2014 .

[33]  Michel Barbeau,et al.  Location-free link state routing for underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2015, 2015 IEEE 28th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE).

[34]  Umar Draz,et al.  Comparison of DBR and L2-ABF routing protocols in underwater wireless sensor network , 2018, 2018 15th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST).

[35]  Umar Draz,et al.  Watchman-based Data Packet Forwarding Algorithm for Underwater Wireless Sensor and Actor Networks , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Electrical, Communication, and Computer Engineering (ICECCE).

[36]  Keyur Rana,et al.  LAVR: link failure avoidance and void recovery routing protocol for underwater sensor networks , 2020, Int. J. Sens. Networks.

[37]  Nadeem Javaid,et al.  NADEEM: Neighbor node approaching distinct energy‐efficient mates for reliable data delivery in underwater WSNs , 2019, Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol..

[38]  Azzedine Boukerche,et al.  GEDAR: Geographic and opportunistic routing protocol with Depth Adjustment for mobile underwater sensor networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[39]  Insoo Koo,et al.  EECOR: An Energy-Efficient Cooperative Opportunistic Routing Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2017, IEEE Access.

[40]  Ohyun Jo,et al.  Iterative Learning for Reliable Link Adaptation in the Internet of Underwater Things , 2021, IEEE Access.

[41]  Nianmin Yao,et al.  WDFAD-DBR: Weighting depth and forwarding area division DBR routing protocol for UASNs , 2016, Ad Hoc Networks.

[42]  Guangjie Han,et al.  An Energy-Aware and Void-Avoidable Routing Protocol for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2018, IEEE Access.

[43]  Azzedine Boukerche,et al.  A novel void node recovery paradigm for long-term underwater sensor networks , 2015, Ad Hoc Networks.

[44]  Dongkyun Kim,et al.  DFR: Directional flooding-based routing protocol for underwater sensor networks , 2008, OCEANS 2008.

[45]  Umar Draz,et al.  A parametric performance evaluation of SMDBRP and AEDGRP routing protocols in underwater wireless sensor network for data transmission , 2018, 2018 International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS).

[46]  Jun-Hong Cui,et al.  DBR: Depth-Based Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2008, Networking.

[47]  Xu Peng-fei Development and Applications of Underwater Acoustic Communication Networks , 2012 .

[48]  Hengchang Jing COVERAGE HOLES RECOVERY ALGORITHM BASED ON NODES BALANCE DISTANCE OF UNDERWATER WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK , 2014 .

[49]  Mario Gerla,et al.  VAPR: Void-Aware Pressure Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[50]  Low Tang Jung,et al.  Flooding control by using Angle Based Cone for UWSNs , 2012, 2012 International Symposium on Telecommunication Technologies.

[51]  Tieshan Li,et al.  A Survey of Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Formation: Performance, Formation Control, and Communication Capability , 2021, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[52]  Beibei Wang,et al.  An Energy-Efficient Routing Void Repair Method Based on an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle for UWSNs , 2021, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[53]  Umar Draz,et al.  Atomic-shaped efficient delay and data gathering routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks , 2019, Turkish J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci..

[54]  Mingsheng Gao,et al.  Underwater Pragmatic Routing Approach Through Packet Reverberation Mechanism , 2020, IEEE Access.

[55]  Asif Nawaz,et al.  Traffic Agents-Based Analysis of Hotspot Effect in IoT-Enabled Wireless Sensor Network , 2021, 2021 International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technologies (IBCAST).