The turn in economics: neoclassical dominance to mainstream pluralism?

This paper investigates whether since the 1980s neoclassical economics has been in the process of being supplanted as the dominant research programme in economics by a collection of competing research approaches which share relatively little in common with each other or with neoclassical economics. A shortlist of the new approaches in recent economics includes game theory, experimental economics, behavioral economics, evolutionary economics, neuroeconomics, and non-linear complexity theory. Two hypotheses are advanced – one regarding the relation between economics instruction and economics research and one regarding the nature of the economics research frontier – to describe social-institutional practices that contribute to the replication of economics as a field. Two further hypotheses are advanced – one regarding the boundaries of the field and one regarding how the field appraises itself – to create a historical–methodological framework for evaluating the question of change in economics and change in recent economics in particular. Finally, the paper distinguishes three leading explanations – the ‘breakdown’ view, the ‘takeover’ view, and the ‘maturity’ view – of why neoclassical economics no longer dominates a mainstream economics.

[1]  V. Smith.  Economics in the Laboratory , 1994 .

[2]  Carsten Herrmann-Pillath.  Neuroeconomics, Naturalism, and Language , 2007 .

[3]  M. Klaes.  The History of the Concept of Transaction Costs: Neglected Aspects , 2000, Journal of the History of Economic Thought.

[4]  W. Arthur.  Inductive Reasoning and Bounded Rationality , 1994 .

[5]  S. Rizvi.  The microfoundations project in general equilibrium theory , 1994 .

[6]  David C. Colander,et al.  What Economists Teach and What Economists Do , 2005 .

[7]  John B. Davis.  Heterodox economics, the fragmentation of the mainstream, and embedded individual analysis , 2007 .

[8]  George M. Saviello.  Comment … , 1969, Comparative Studies in Society and History.

[9]  Robin P. Cubitt,et al.  Discovered preferences and the experimental evidence of violations of expected utility theory , 2001 .

[10]  Matthias Benz,et al.  From Imperialism to Inspiration: A Survey of Economics and Psychology , 2002 .

[11]  The History of Economics as a Subdiscipline: The Role of the History of Economics Society Meetings , 2002 .

[12]  David C. Colander.  The Lost Art of Economics , 2001 .

[13]  P. David.  Why are institutions the ‘carriers of history’?: Path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions , 1994 .

[14]  Daniel M. Hausman,et al.  The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics , 1993 .

[15]  M. S. Morgan,et al.  From interwar pluralism to post-war neoclassicism , 1998 .

[16]  Philip Mirowski,et al.  More Heat Than Light. Economics as Social Physics: Physics as Nature's Economics. , 1991 .

[17]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future , 2003 .

[18]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[19]  A. Sen,et al.  The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal , 1970, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  E. Weintraub.  The Future of the History of Economics , 2002 .

[21]  Philip Mirowski.  Machine Dreams Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science , 2001 .

[22]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[23]  E. Sent.  Engineering Dynamic Economics , 1996 .

[24]  David Colander,et al.  The Death of Neoclassical Economics , 2000, Journal of the History of Economic Thought.

[25]  John M. Vickers,et al.  :Reflection without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory , 2002 .

[26]  Philip Mirowski,et al.  More Heat Than Light: Economics as Social Physics , 1989 .

[27]  Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science: Philip Mirowski, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002 , 2004 .

[28]  M. Blaug.  The Formalist Revolution of the 1950s , 2003, Journal of the History of Economic Thought.

[29]  Vernon L. Smith,et al.  Theory, Experiment and Economics , 1989 .

[30]  Alan Kirman,et al.  The Intrinsic Limits of Modern Economic-Theory - the Emperor Has No Clothes , 1989 .

[31]  J. Rosser,et al.  Live and dead issues in the methodology of economics , 2007 .

[32]  Anthony A Brewer.  Blackwell Companion to the History of Economic Thought , 2003 .

[33]  Richard H. Thaler,et al.  Anomalies: The January Effect , 1987 .