Comparison of bond strength of different endodontic sealers to root dentin: An in vitro push-out test

Aim: To compare the bond strength of four different endodontic sealers to root dentin through push-out test design. Materials and Methods: Forty single-rooted teeth with completely formed apices were selected. Teeth were decoronated, and working length was determined. Instrumentation and irrigation were performed. The teeth were divided into four groups based upon the sealer used. Group 1: Bioceramic sealer (Endosequence), Group 2: Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) based sealer (MTA Fill apex), Group 3: Epoxy resin based sealer (MM-Seal), and Group 4: Dual cure resin-based sealer (Hybrid Root Seal). Manipulation and application of the sealer was done as per the manufacturer instructions. All the teeth were obturated using 6% gutta-percha. After obturation, each tooth was prepared for push-out test with root slices of 2 mm thickness using universal testing machine. Results: The highest bond strength was found in Group 1 (Endosequence) (P < 0.05) compared to other groups. The lowest bond strength was found in Group 2 (MTA Fill apex). Statistical analysis is done by two-way ANOVA and Newman-Keuls multiple post hoc. Conclusion: The push-out bond strength of Bioceramic sealer was highest followed by resin-based sealer and lowest bond strength was observed in MTA-based sealer.

[1]  Jianing He,et al.  The effect of obturation technique on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate sealers. , 2015, Journal of endodontics.

[2]  Jaykumar R. Gade,et al.  Evaluation of push-out bond strength of endosequence BC sealer with lateral condensation and thermoplasticized technique: An in vitro study , 2015, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[3]  S. Rahimi,et al.  Push-Out Bond Strength of Dorifill, Epiphany and MTA-Fillapex Sealers to Root Canal Dentin with and without Smear Layer , 2014, Iranian endodontic journal.

[4]  Kezban Çelik,et al.  Apical microleakage of different root canal sealers after use of maleic acid and EDTA as final irrigants. , 2014, Brazilian oral research.

[5]  E. Silva,et al.  Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of a MTA-based root canal sealer , 2014 .

[6]  V. Sikri,et al.  Apical sealing ability of two novel root canal sealers: An ex-vivo study , 2014 .

[7]  S. González-López,et al.  Bond strength to root dentin and fluid filtration test of AH Plus/gutta-percha, EndoREZ and RealSeal systems. , 2013, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[8]  A. Patil,et al.  An in vitro comparison of bond strengths of Gutta-percha/AH Plus, Resilon/Epiphany self-etch and EndoREZ obturation system to intraradicular dentin using a push-out test design , 2013, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[9]  A. Shamshiri,et al.  The Effect of Different Irrigation Protocols for Smear Layer Removal on Bond Strength of a New Bioceramic Sealer , 2013, Iranian endodontic journal.

[10]  B. Sağsen,et al.  Push-out bond strength of two new calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers to root canal dentine. , 2011, International endodontic journal.

[11]  A. Ghoneim,et al.  Resistance to fracture of roots obturated with novel canal-filling systems. , 2011, Journal of endodontics.

[12]  M. Tanomaru-Filho,et al.  Bond strength of different endodontic sealers to dentin: push-out test , 2011, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[13]  N. Sarkar,et al.  Physicochemical basis of the biologic properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[14]  D. Pashley,et al.  Adhesion of endodontic sealers to dentin and gutta-percha. , 2002, Journal of endodontics.