Calibration of numerical models for small debris flows in Yosemite Valley, California, USA

Abstract. This study compares documented debris flow runout distances with numerical simulations in the Yosemite Valley of California, USA, where about 15% of historical events of slope instability can be classified as debris flows and debris slides (Wieczorek and Snyder, 2004). To model debris flows in the Yosemite Valley, we selected six streams with evidence of historical debris flows; three of the debris flow deposits have single channels, and the other three split their pattern in the fan area into two or more channels. From field observations all of the debris flows involved coarse material, with only very small clay content. We applied the one dimensional DAN (Dynamic ANalysis) model (Hungr, 1995) and the two-dimensional FLO-2D model (O'Brien et al., 1993) to predict and compare the runout distance and the velocity of the debris flows observed in the study area. As a first step, we calibrated the parameters for the two softwares through the back analysis of three debris- flows channels using a trial-and-error procedure starting with values suggested in the literature. In the second step we applied the selected values to the other channels, in order to evaluate their predictive capabilities. After parameter calibration using three debris flows we obtained results similar to field observations We also obtained a good agreement between the two models for velocities. Both models are strongly influenced by topography: we used the 30 m cell size DTM available for the study area, that is probably not accurate enough for a highly detailed analysis, but it can be sufficient for a first screening.

[1]  W. R. Osterkamp,et al.  Streamflow characteristics related to channel geometry of streams in western United States , 1982 .

[2]  Richard M. Iverson,et al.  Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three‐dimensional terrain: 2. Numerical predictions and experimental tests , 2001 .

[3]  Helmut J. Körner,et al.  Reichweite und Geschwindigkeit von Bergstürzen und Fließschneelawinen , 1976 .

[4]  Richard M. Iverson,et al.  Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three‐dimensional terrain: 1. Coulomb mixture theory , 2001 .

[5]  James B. Snyder,et al.  Historical Rock Falls in Yosemite National Park, California , 2004 .

[6]  F. Matthes Geologic History of the Yosemite Valley , 1930 .

[7]  M. Baucus Transportation Research Board , 1982 .

[8]  Giulio Iovine,et al.  Rock-fall Potential in the Yosemite Valley, California , 1999 .

[9]  John E. Costa,et al.  Physical Geomorphology of Debris Flows , 1984 .

[10]  D. Varnes SLOPE MOVEMENT TYPES AND PROCESSES , 1978 .

[11]  N. R. Morgenstern,et al.  Rapid flow slides of coal-mine waste in British Columbia, Canada , 2002 .

[12]  G. Wieczorek,et al.  Triggering mechanisms and depositional rates of postglacial slope-movement processes in the Yosemite Valley, California , 1996 .

[13]  N. K. Huber The Geologic Story of Yosemite National Park , 1989 .

[14]  P. C. Bateman A summary of critical relations in the central part of the Sierra Nevada batholith, California, U.S.A. , 1983 .

[15]  Chen Chen-lung,et al.  DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT , 2007 .

[16]  P. Julien,et al.  Two‐Dimensional Water Flood and Mudflow Simulation , 1993 .

[17]  Oldrich Hungr,et al.  A model for the runout analysis of rapid flow slides, debris flows, and avalanches , 1995 .

[18]  Ralph O. Kehle,et al.  Physical Processes in Geology , 1972 .

[19]  Comparison of Debris Flow Modelling Approaches , 1997 .