Engineering Cell Instructive Materials To Control Cell Fate and Functions through Material Cues and Surface Patterning.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Hubbell,et al. An RGD spacing of 440 nm is sufficient for integrin alpha V beta 3- mediated fibroblast spreading and 140 nm for focal contact and stress fiber formation , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.
[2] Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al. Matrix Stiffness: A Regulator of Cellular Behavior and Tissue Formation , 2012 .
[3] J. Spatz,et al. Different sensitivity of human endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts to topography in the nano-micro range. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.
[4] A. Harris,et al. Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.
[5] Paolo A Netti,et al. Determinants of cell–material crosstalk at the interface: towards engineering of cell instructive materials , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[6] Murat Guvendiren,et al. Stiffening hydrogels to probe short- and long-term cellular responses to dynamic mechanics , 2012, Nature Communications.
[7] Joseph Hemmerlé,et al. Biomimetic cryptic site surfaces for reversible chemo- and cyto-mechanoresponsive substrates. , 2013, ACS nano.
[8] Jiandong Ding,et al. Effect of cell anisotropy on differentiation of stem cells on micropatterned surfaces through the controlled single cell adhesion. , 2011, Biomaterials.
[9] Paolo A Netti,et al. Crosstalk between focal adhesions and material mechanical properties governs cell mechanics and functions. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.
[10] Andre Levchenko,et al. Nanoscale cues regulate the structure and function of macroscopic cardiac tissue constructs , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[11] J. Spatz,et al. Block Copolymer Micelle Nanolithography , 2003 .
[12] D. Ingber,et al. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[13] M. Textor,et al. Surface engineering approaches to micropattern surfaces for cell-based assays. , 2006, Biomaterials.
[14] J. Jansen,et al. The influence of nanoscale topographical cues on initial osteoblast morphology and migration. , 2010, European cells & materials.
[15] Kshitiz Gupta,et al. Mechanosensitivity of fibroblast cell shape and movement to anisotropic substratum topography gradients. , 2009, Biomaterials.
[16] David J. Mooney,et al. Harnessing Traction-Mediated Manipulation of the Cell-Matrix Interface to Control Stem Cell Fate , 2010, Nature materials.
[17] Sungho Jin,et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[18] F. Tang,et al. Dynamic equilibrium and heterogeneity of mouse pluripotent stem cells with distinct functional and epigenetic states. , 2008, Cell stem cell.
[19] Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al. Harnessing nanotopography and integrin-matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate. , 2014, Nature materials.
[20] R. G. Richards,et al. Nanotopographical modification: a regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions. , 2010, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.
[21] B. Geiger,et al. Regulation of Integrin Adhesions by Varying the Density of Substrate-Bound Epidermal Growth Factor , 2012, Biointerphases.
[22] A. Borzacchiello,et al. Covalently immobilized RGD gradient on PEG hydrogel scaffold influences cell migration parameters. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.
[23] Ning Wang,et al. Soft Substrates Promote Homogeneous Self-Renewal of Embryonic Stem Cells via Downregulating Cell-Matrix Tractions , 2010, PloS one.
[24] Jiandong Ding,et al. Effects of aspect ratios of stem cells on lineage commitments with and without induction media. , 2013, Biomaterials.
[25] S. Thrun,et al. Substrate Elasticity Regulates Skeletal Muscle Stem Cell Self-Renewal in Culture , 2010, Science.
[26] Pietro Ferraro,et al. Reversible Holographic Patterns on Azopolymers for Guiding Cell Adhesion and Orientation. , 2015, ACS applied materials & interfaces.
[27] Martin A. Schwartz,et al. Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[28] Daniela Guarnieri,et al. Surface investigation on biomimetic materials to control cell adhesion: the case of RGD conjugation on PCL. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.
[29] Donald E Ingber,et al. Mechanical control of tissue and organ development , 2010, Development.
[30] Teodor Veres,et al. Surface topography induces 3D self-orientation of cells and extracellular matrix resulting in improved tissue function. , 2009, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.
[31] Shelly R. Peyton,et al. Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion , 2005, Journal of cellular physiology.
[32] Wesley R. Legant,et al. Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels , 2013, Nature materials.
[33] Horst Kessler,et al. RGD modified polymers: biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and beyond. , 2003, Biomaterials.
[34] Jennifer S. Park,et al. The effect of matrix stiffness on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in response to TGF-β. , 2011, Biomaterials.
[35] Paolo A Netti,et al. Tuning the material-cytoskeleton crosstalk via nanoconfinement of focal adhesions. , 2014, Biomaterials.
[36] R. Langer,et al. Engineering substrate topography at the micro- and nanoscale to control cell function. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.
[37] Shelly R. Peyton,et al. The use of poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels to investigate the impact of ECM chemistry and mechanics on smooth muscle cells. , 2006, Biomaterials.
[38] E. Danen,et al. A guide to mechanobiology: Where biology and physics meet. , 2015, Biochimica et biophysica acta.
[39] J. Hubbell,et al. Human endothelial cell interactions with surface-coupled adhesion peptides on a nonadhesive glass substrate and two polymeric biomaterials. , 1991, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[40] M. Eiraku,et al. Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in three-dimensional culture , 2011, Neuroscience Research.
[41] Kam W Leong,et al. Synthetic nanostructures inducing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into neuronal lineage. , 2007, Experimental cell research.
[42] D. Scharnweber,et al. Functionalization of biomaterial surfaces using artificial extracellular matrices , 2012, Biomatter.
[43] Joachim P Spatz,et al. Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. , 2004, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.
[44] Christopher S. Chen,et al. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.
[45] Milan Mrksich,et al. Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[46] Maurizio Ventre,et al. Topographic cell instructive patterns to control cell adhesion, polarization and migration , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[47] Benjamin Geiger,et al. Molecular architecture and function of matrix adhesions. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.
[48] John K. Tomfohr,et al. Measurement of cell migration on surface-bound fibronectin gradients. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.
[49] C. S. Chen,et al. Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.
[50] P. Netti,et al. Ligand engagement on material surfaces is discriminated by cell mechanosensoring. , 2015, Biomaterials.
[51] L G Griffith,et al. Cell adhesion and motility depend on nanoscale RGD clustering. , 2000, Journal of cell science.
[52] Mikhail Zhernenkov,et al. Thermoresponsive PNIPAM Coatings on Nanostructured Gratings for Cell Alignment and Release. , 2015, ACS applied materials & interfaces.
[53] Huaping Tan,et al. Gradient biomaterials and their influences on cell migration , 2012, Interface Focus.
[54] Michael P. Sheetz,et al. Stretching Single Talin Rod Molecules Activates Vinculin Binding , 2009, Science.
[55] N. Gadegaard,et al. Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. , 2011, Nature materials.
[56] T. Munro,et al. Nanoscale presentation of cell adhesive molecules via block copolymer self-assembly. , 2009, Biomaterials.
[57] Justin Cooper-White,et al. The influence of substrate creep on mesenchymal stem cell behaviour and phenotype. , 2011, Biomaterials.
[58] Michael W. Davidson,et al. Nanoscale architecture of integrin-based cell adhesions , 2010, Nature.
[59] Xu,et al. "Dip-Pen" nanolithography , 1999, Science.
[60] M. Bissell,et al. Of extracellular matrix, scaffolds, and signaling: tissue architecture regulates development, homeostasis, and cancer. , 2006, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.
[61] Li Yang,et al. Biophysical regulation of histone acetylation in mesenchymal stem cells. , 2011, Biophysical journal.
[62] Mark Schvartzman,et al. Nanolithographic control of the spatial organization of cellular adhesion receptors at the single-molecule level. , 2011, Nano letters.
[63] C. Wilkinson,et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.
[64] Paolo A Netti,et al. Nanoengineered surfaces for focal adhesion guidance trigger mesenchymal stem cell self-organization and tenogenesis. , 2015, Nano letters.
[65] Keesung Kim,et al. Direct differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into selective neurons on nanoscale ridge/groove pattern arrays. , 2010, Biomaterials.
[66] Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic,et al. The effect of actin disrupting agents on contact guidance of human embryonic stem cells. , 2007, Biomaterials.
[67] K. Christman,et al. Nanoscale growth factor patterns by immobilization on a heparin-mimicking polymer. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[68] P. Janmey,et al. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.
[69] S. Sen,et al. Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.
[70] Filippo Stefanoni,et al. Molding Micropatterns of Elasticity on PEG‐Based Hydrogels to Control Cell Adhesion and Migration , 2011 .
[71] J. Jansen,et al. The threshold at which substrate nanogroove dimensions may influence fibroblast alignment and adhesion. , 2007, Biomaterials.
[72] L. Trusolino,et al. Interactions between growth factor receptors and adhesion molecules: breaking the rules. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.
[73] Sujata K. Bhatia,et al. Engineering Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine: Novel Technologies for Clinical Applications , 2012 .
[74] Juergen A. Knoblich,et al. Organogenesis in a dish: Modeling development and disease using organoid technologies , 2014, Science.
[75] Jeffrey R Capadona,et al. Polymer brushes and self-assembled monolayers: Versatile platforms to control cell adhesion to biomaterials (Review) , 2009, Biointerphases.