Stability analysis of human stance control from the system theoretic point of view

This paper analyzes basic aspects of the human stance control. It proceeds from a linear model of the human body as an inverted pendulum. The model is used to show how humans achieve control stability despite considerable neural time delays of the sensory feedback loops that pass through higher brain centers and allow for context dependent and modifiable responses. Control stability is attributed to the fact that these long-latency (LL) loops are combined with short-latency (SL) loops of `primitive' (stereotype) reflexes via spinal cord and brainstem and with passive loops with virtually no time delay given by the intrinsic musculoskeletal stiffness and damping. The tool used for our stability analysis is an extended Nyquist Criterion. Weighting the combination of the three sets of feedback loops is identified as a key to the adaptability properties of the human stance control and its energy efficiency.

[1]  T. Mergner,et al.  Multisensory control of human upright stance , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Marjorie H. Woollacott,et al.  Aging and Posture Control: Changes in Sensory Organization and Muscular Coordination , 1986, International journal of aging & human development.

[3]  N. Hogan.  Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles , 1984 .

[4]  S C Gandevia,et al.  Loop gain of reflexes controlling human standing measured with the use of postural and vestibular disturbances. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  C Maurer,et al.  A multisensory posture control model of human upright stance. , 2003, Progress in brain research.

[6]  J. Andrew Pruszynski,et al.  Primary motor cortex underlies multi-joint integration for fast feedback control , 2011, Nature.

[7]  S. Park,et al.  Feedback equilibrium control during human standing , 2005, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  Libor Pekař,et al.  The Nyquist criterion for LTI time-delay systems , 2011 .

[9]  Patrick J. Loughlin,et al.  Stiffness and Damping in Postural Control Increase With Age , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Simon C Gandevia,et al.  Proprioception: peripheral inputs and perceptual interactions. , 2002, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[11]  Thomas Mergner,et al.  A neurological view on reactive human stance control , 2010, Annu. Rev. Control..

[12]  J. C. Rothwell,et al.  Postural electromyographic responses in the arm and leg following galvanic vestibular stimulation in man , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  R E Poppele,et al.  Representation of multiple kinematic parameters of the cat hindlimb in spinocerebellar activity. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Kimitaka Nakazawa,et al.  Short- and long-latency reflex responses during different motor tasks in elbow flexor muscles , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  F. M. R. Walshe,et al.  ON CERTAIN TONIC OR POSTURAL REFLEXES IN HEMIPLEGIA, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE SO-CALLED “ASSOCIATED MOVEMENTS.” , 1923 .

[16]  Mergner Thomas.  Postural Control by Disturbance Estimation and Compensation Through Long-Loop Responses , 2012 .

[17]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  An adaptive model of sensory integration in a dynamic environment applied to human stance control , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  R. Peterka.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  F. Zajac.  Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[20]  F. Horak,et al.  Postural Orientation and Equilibrium , 2011 .