Indications for electrophysiologic testing in the diagnosis and assessment of sinus node dysfunction.

CLINICALLY, sinus node dysfunction (SND) is a multifaceted disorder comprising not only disturbances of sinus impulse generation and conduction to the atria but also impaired impulse transmission within the atria and specialized cardiac conduction system, abnormalities of subsidiary pacemaker function, and increased susceptibility to development of paroxysmal or chronic primary atrial tachycardias. ` In recent years a variety of electrophysiologic testing procedures have been developed in hope of improving our ability to recognize when SND may be responsible for symptoms in patients. The rationale and method underlying electrophysiologic tests of "sinus node function" have been detailed previously (for example, refs. 3 to 8). The objective of this discussion is to provide an overview of indications for proceeding with electrophysiologic testing for SND and to highlight limitations that should be considered in using and interpreting test results. In this context, the term SND will be used to refer primarily to disturbances of sinus node impulse generation and sinoatrial conduction. Uses of electrophysiologic testing in SND. Electrophysiologic disturbances characteristic of SND may be caused by a wide array of processes that alter the anatomy of the sinus node and/or surrounding atrium, interrupt their functional integrity, and result in what may be termed primary or "intrinsic" SND. Alternatively, SND may be secondary ("'extrinsic") to disturbances of autonomic neural control8'9 or the effects of cardioactive drugs.?' The extent to which intrinsic and extrinsic SND overlap or coexist has not been well defined. However, it may be reasonable to assume that the presence of the former may increase susceptibility to extrinsic neural or drug effects. Electrophysiologic testing techniques have been developed with the objective of assessing both the princi-

[1]  C. Gornick,et al.  Single-chamber cardiac pacing with activity-initiated chronotropic response: evaluation by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. , 1987, Circulation.

[2]  C. Gornick,et al.  Carotid sinus hypersensitivity: evaluation of the vasodepressor component. , 1985, Circulation.

[3]  E. Gang,et al.  Appropriate Diagnostic Studies for Sinus Node Dysfunction , 1985, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[4]  M. Josephson,et al.  Electrophysiologic evaluation and follow-up characteristics of patients with recurrent unexplained syncope and presyncope. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  J. Bigger,et al.  Electrophysiologic studies of the sinus node and atria. , 1985, Cardiovascular clinics.

[6]  J. A. Gomes,et al.  New application of direct sinus node recordings in man: assessment of sinus node recovery time. , 1984, Circulation.

[7]  L. Szatmáry Autonomic blockade and sick sinus syndrome. New concept in the interpretation of electrophysiological and Holter data. , 1984, European heart journal.

[8]  R. Anderson,et al.  Atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, and other primary atrial tachycardias. , 1984, The Medical clinics of North America.

[9]  D. Hayes,et al.  Stability of AV conduction in sick sinus node syndrome patients with implanted atrial pacemakers. , 1984, American heart journal.

[10]  H. Strauss,et al.  The measurement of sinus node refractoriness in man. , 1983, Circulation.

[11]  M. Shenasa,et al.  Role of Cardiac Electrophysiologic Studies in Patients with Unexplained Recurrent Syncope , 1983, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[12]  J. Bigger,et al.  Sinus node recovery times following the spontaneous termination of supraventricular tachycardia and following atrial overdrive pacing: a comparison. , 1983, American heart journal.

[13]  F. Morady,et al.  Electrophysiologic testing in the evaluation of patients with syncope of undetermined origin. , 1982, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  V Hombach,et al.  The applicability of the signal averaging technique in clinical cardiology , 1982, Clinical cardiology.

[15]  G. Veress,et al.  Electrophysiological classification of normal and pathological sinus node function. , 1982, Acta medica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae.

[16]  B. Massie,et al.  Electrophysiologic Effects of Combined Autonomic Blockade in Patients with Sinus Node Disease , 1981, Circulation.

[17]  E. Caraşca,et al.  Sinoatrial node electrical activity recording through intracavitary leads. , 1981, Physiologie.

[18]  J. Bigger,et al.  The Human Sinus Node Electrogram: A Transvenous Catheter Technique and a Comparison of Directly Measured and Indirectly Estimated Sinoatrial Conduction Time in Adults , 1980, Circulation.

[19]  P. Samet,et al.  Electrophysiologic evaluation of elderly patients with sinus bradycardia: a long-term follow-up study. , 2020, Annals of internal medicine.

[20]  M. Rubenfire,et al.  Pre‐P (Sino‐Atrial Node Region) Activity Recording from the Right Atrial Cavity by Signal Averaging * , 1979, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[21]  R. Peters,et al.  Electrophysiologic testing in patients with sinus pauses and/or sinoatrial exit block. , 1978, European journal of cardiology.

[22]  B. Massie,et al.  Adverse effects of sympatholytic agents in patients with hypertension and sinus node dysfunction. , 1978, The American journal of medicine.

[23]  W. Mandel,et al.  Studies on the Mechanism of Sinus Node Dysfunction in the Sick Sinus Syndrome , 1978, Circulation.

[24]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Programmed Atrial Stimulation Used for the Calculation of Sinoatrial Conduction Time (SACT) in Man , 1978 .

[25]  D. Browning,et al.  Programmed Atrial Stimulation and Rapid Atrial Pacing in Patients with Sinus Pauses and Sinoatrial Exit Block , 1978 .

[26]  B. Lüderitz,et al.  Relevance of Diagnostic Atrial Stimulation for Pacemaker Treatment in Sinoatrial Disease , 1978 .

[27]  D. Browning,et al.  Review of the Significance of Drugs in the Sick Sinus Node Syndrome , 1978 .

[28]  T. Pop,et al.  Measurement of Sinus Node Recovery Time After Atrial Pacing , 1978 .

[29]  P. Bower Sick sinus syndrome. , 1978, Archives of internal medicine.

[30]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Sinus Node Recovery Time and Calculated Sinoatrial Conduction Time in Normal Subjects and Patients with Sinus Node Dysfunction , 1977, Circulation.

[31]  E. Prystowsky,et al.  Sino-atrial and atrial electrogenesis. , 1977, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[32]  A. Wallace,et al.  Analysis of Secondary Pauses Following Termination of Rapid Atrial Pacing in Man , 1976, Circulation.

[33]  B. Lüderitz,et al.  Sinus Node Recovery Time and Sinoatrial Conduction Time , 1976 .

[34]  P. Denes,et al.  Sinus nodal responses to atrial extrastimuli in patients without apparent sinus node disease. , 1975, The American journal of cardiology.

[35]  B. Lüderitz,et al.  Comparative study of sinoatrial conduction time and sinus node recovery time. , 1975, British heart journal.

[36]  E. Lichstein,et al.  Appraisal of sinus nodal recovery time in patients with sick sinus syndrome. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.

[37]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Action of antiarrhythmic drugs on His bundle electrogram and sinus node function. , 1974, Acta cardiologica.

[38]  O. Narula Atrioventricular Conduction Defects in Patients with Sinus Bradycardia: Analysis by His Bundle Recordings , 1971, Circulation.

[39]  K. Rosen,et al.  Cardiac Conduction in Patients with Symptomatic Sinus Node Disease , 1971, Circulation.

[40]  M. I. Ferrer,et al.  The sick sinus syndrome in atrial disease. , 1968, JAMA.