Organising the process of knowledge integration: the benefits of structural ambiguity

In this article we examine how loose coupling between units and people can benefit a firm's ability to combine and recombine knowledge-based resources continuously in a creative and flexible way. An in-depth study of Oticon A/S suggests that loose coupling can be deliberately brought into the design of the organisation by introducing a certain structural ambiguity into the configuration of role systems and authority relationships. In the first part of the paper, we show how loose coupling among units and people is a distinctive feature of the way Oticon organises its administrative activities. In the second, we explore the structural properties of a loosely coupled arrangement. We develop the concepts of multipolarity, fluidity and interconnectedness and we show how these properties conduce to an increase in the effectiveness, efficiency and flexibility of the processes of knowledge integration. Structural ambiguity is thus proposed as a viable design principle for organisations operating in hypercompetitive environment, where flexible knowledge integration represents a critical condition of survival.

[1]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  Organizational capabilities in product development of Japanese firm , 1995 .

[2]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[3]  Thomas J. Peters,et al.  Liberation Management: Necessary Disorganization for the Nanosecond Nineties , 1992 .

[4]  Parvinder Gupta,et al.  Management of Organizational Change , 1998 .

[5]  Richard A. D'Aveni,et al.  New Organizational Forms and Strategies for Managing in Hypercompetitive Environments , 1996 .

[6]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[7]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[8]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[9]  D. Aaker,et al.  THE NEED FOR STRATEGIC FLEXIBILITY , 1984 .

[10]  A BurgelmanRobert Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation , 1991 .

[11]  M. W. Shields,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems , 1997 .

[12]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[13]  M. Rouse,et al.  Rethinking research methods for the resource‐based perspective: isolating sources of sustainable competitive advantage , 1999 .

[14]  B. Clark,et al.  The higher education system : academic organization in cross-national perspective , 1984 .

[15]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[16]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change , 1984 .

[17]  D. Dougherty A PRACTICE-CENTERED MODEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL RENEWAL THROUGH PRODUCT INNOVATION , 1992 .

[18]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[19]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[20]  NagataAkiya,et al.  Organizational Capabilities in Product Development of Japanese Firms , 1998 .

[21]  Robert Dreeben,et al.  Coupling and Control in Educational Organizations. , 1986 .

[22]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[23]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[24]  Henry Mintzberg Patterns in Strategy Formation , 1978, International Studies of Management & Organization.

[25]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  The management of resources and the resource of management , 1995 .

[26]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[27]  Robert A. Burgelman Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research , 1991 .

[28]  William A. Firestone,et al.  The Study of Loose Coupling: Problems, Progress, and Prospects. , 1984 .

[29]  K. Weick Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[30]  K. Weick Organizational redesign as improvisation , 1993 .

[31]  A. Pallas,et al.  Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization , 1995 .

[32]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Strategy Formation in the University Setting , 2017 .

[33]  D. L. Flarey Liberation Management Necessary Disorganization for the Nanosecond Nineties , 1993 .

[34]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[35]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Organizational Capabilities in Product Development of Japanese Firms: a Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings , 1998 .

[36]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[37]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change , 1995 .

[38]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[39]  H. Tsoukas The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach , 1996 .

[40]  R. Grant Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[41]  M. Malone The Virtual Corporation , 1993 .

[42]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[43]  J. Spender Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[44]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[45]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[46]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[47]  B. Hedberg,et al.  Career dynamics in a steelworks of the future , 1984 .

[48]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[49]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[50]  Jean-Louis Denis,et al.  Leadership and Strategic Change under Ambiguity , 1996 .

[51]  R. Henderson The evolution of integrative capability: innovation in cardiovascular drug discovery , 1994 .

[52]  D. Dougherty,et al.  The Illegitimacy of Successful Product Innovation in Established Firms , 1994 .