Testing the safety of after-hours telephone triage: Patient simulations with validated scenarios

Summary Background The aim of this study is to estimate the appropriateness of recommended dispositions made in response to calls to after hours services offering telephone triage, usually involving nurses. The setting was five local trials sponsored by the Australian government aimed at addressing problems in after hours general practice service provision. All five trials offered telephone triage though the form of this varied considerably. Methods The study was a prospective service audit. Simulated patient calls using validated patient care scenarios with different levels of clinical significance were developed by a consensus panel of experts. Sixty telephone calls were monitored by a member of the research team to assess whether provider responses were in conformity with recommended dispositions. Results Services fell well short of a 100% appropriate response rate across all five trials. Services generally performed poorly for cases with high clinical implications such as presumed meningococcal meningitis and gastroenteritis with dehydration in a child. In general, problems of undertriage were more common than overtriage. Conclusions The safety of dispositions of telephone triage services requires further study. Simulated patient calls may be more useful for quality improvement purposes than the usual method of random audit of audiotaped calls of real patients using service records.

[1]  F Bunn,et al.  Telephone consultation and triage: effects on health care use and patient satisfaction. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  R. Winkens,et al.  New methodology for using incognito standardised patients for telephone consultation in primary care , 2009, Medical education.

[3]  David A Richards,et al.  Quality monitoring of nurse telephone triage: pilot study. , 2004, Journal of advanced nursing.

[4]  James Munro,et al.  Equity of access to health care. Evidence from NHS Direct in the UK , 2006, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[5]  M. Roland Nurse‐led telephone advice , 2002, The Medical journal of Australia.

[6]  T. Timpka,et al.  The primary-care nurse's dilemmas: a study of knowledge use and need during telephone consultations. , 1990, Journal of advanced nursing.

[7]  H. Moriarty,et al.  Mystery shopping in health service evaluation. , 2003, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[8]  R E Sapien,et al.  Pediatric telephone triage protocols: standardized decisionmaking or a false sense of security? , 1999, Annals of emergency medicine.

[9]  J André Knottnerus,et al.  Quality of clinical aspects of call handling at Dutch out of hours centres: cross sectional national study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Jane M. Young,et al.  Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  D J Balaban,et al.  Telephone triage by primary care physicians. , 1992, Pediatrics.

[12]  B Edwards,et al.  Telephone triage: how experienced nurses reach decisions. , 1994, Journal of advanced nursing.

[13]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  How helpful is NHS Direct? Postal survey of callers , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  J. Steiner,et al.  Consistency of triage decisions by call center nurses. , 2002, Ambulatory pediatrics : the official journal of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association.

[15]  J. Dale,et al.  Safety of telephone consultation for “non-serious” emergency ambulance service patients , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[16]  J. Dale,et al.  Telephone triage--how good are the decisions? (Part 2). , 1998, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[17]  E. Perrin,et al.  Evening Telephone Call Management by Nurse Practitioners and Physicians , 1978, Nursing Research.