Recognition memory for briefly presented pictures: the time course of rapid forgetting.

When viewing a rapid sequence of pictures, observers momentarily understand the gist of each scene but have poor recognition memory for most of them (M. C. Potter, 1976). Is forgetting immediate, or does some information persist briefly? Sequences of 5 scenes were presented for 173 ms/picture; when yes-no testing began immediately, recognition was initially high but declined markedly during the 10-item test. With testing delays of 2 or 6 s, the decline over testing was less steep. When 10 or 20 pictures were presented, there was again a marked initial decline during testing. A 2-alternative forced-choice recognition test produced similar results. Both the passage of time and test interference (but not presentation interference) led to forgetting. The brief persistence of information may assist in building a coherent representation over several fixations.

[1]  Carla H. Lagorio,et al.  Psychology , 1929, Nature.

[2]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[3]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments , 1964 .

[4]  R. Nickerson,et al.  SHORT-TERM MEMORY FOR COMPLEX MEANINGFUL VISUAL CONFIGURATIONS: A DEMONSTRATION OF CAPACITY. , 1965, Canadian journal of psychology.

[5]  R. Shepard.  Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures , 1967 .

[6]  M. Potter,et al.  Recognition memory for a rapid sequence of pictures. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  J. Grier,et al.  Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: computing formulas. , 1971, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  L. Standing.  Learning 10,000 pictures. , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  M. Potter.  Meaning in visual search. , 1975, Science.

[10]  B. Sakitt,et al.  Iconic memory. , 1976, Psychological review.

[11]  M. Potter.  Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[12]  W. A. Phillips,et al.  Components of Visual Memory , 1977 .

[13]  H. Intraub.  The role of implicit naming in pictorial encoding. , 1979 .

[14]  H. Intraub,et al.  Presentation rate and the representation of briefly glimpsed pictures in memory. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[15]  H. Intraub.  Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures. , 1981 .

[16]  William A. Phillips,et al.  Short-Term Visual Memory , 1983 .

[17]  G. Loftus,et al.  Perceptual and conceptual masking of pictures. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  H. Intraub.  Conceptual masking: the effects of subsequent visual events on memory for pictures. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  G. Miller,et al.  The Cognitive Sciences , 1984 .

[20]  James L. Elliot,et al.  Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA 02139 , 1985 .

[21]  G. Loftus,et al.  Conceptual masking: How one picture captures attention from another picture , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[23]  D. E. Irwin.  Memory for position and identity across eye movements. , 1992 .

[24]  M. Potter.  Very short-term conceptual memory , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[25]  W. Donaldson,et al.  Accuracy of d′ and A′ as estimates of sensitivity , 1993 .

[26]  M. Potter,et al.  Word Perception and Misperception in Context , 1993 .

[27]  Steven M. J. Hunt,et al.  MacProbe: A Macintosh-based experimenter’s workstation for the cognitive sciences , 1994 .

[28]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements. , 1996 .

[30]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[31]  E. Vogel,et al.  Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink , 1996, Nature.

[32]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[33]  John M. Henderson,et al.  Transsaccadic Memory and Integration During Real-World Object Perception , 1997 .

[34]  M. Potter,et al.  Word selection in reading sentences: preceding versus following contexts. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Rapid categorization of natural images by rhesus monkeys , 1998, Neuroreport.

[36]  J. Henderson,et al.  High-level scene perception. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[37]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  On the Failure to Detect Changes in Scenes Across Brief Interruptions , 2000 .

[38]  David E. Irwin,et al.  The role of physical and conceptual properties in preserving object continuity. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  Carrick C. Williams,et al.  To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[40]  P. Fldik,et al.  The Speed of Sight , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  J. Henderson,et al.  Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes , 2002 .