A comparative study on in vitro enzymatic degradation of poly(glycerol sebacate) and poly(xylitol sebacate)

Poly(glycerol sebacate) (PGS) is a soft elastomer suitable for tissue engineering of soft types. However, the rapid degradation kinetics of this polyester has become one of the major drawbacks in the application of tissue engineering. In this work, a comparative study on in vitro enzymatic degradation of PGS- and poly(xylitol sebacate) (PXS)-based materials has been conducted, using a recently established in vitro experimental protocol. This protocol, which can simulate and predict in vivo enzymatic degradation kinetics of polymer implants, was further refined in this work. The comparative study was conducted in tissue culture medium and a buffer solution of pH optima, under static and cyclic mechanical loading conditions. It was found that in vitro enzymatic degradation rates of the PXS-based materials were significantly slower than those of PGS in both the tissue culture medium and buffered solution of pH optima (pH 8). The in vitro enzymatic degradation of PGS-based biomaterials tested was about 0.1–0.4 mm month−1 in tissue culture medium, while the rates were in the range of 0.05–0.2 mm month−1 for PXS-based materials. Enzymatic degradation was enhanced in relation to mechanical deformation, whereas PXS-based materials were influenced little. Hence, PXS, which is as soft as PGS but degrades significantly slower than PGS, is a better option for applications in tissue engineering of soft types.

[1]  G. Thouas,et al.  Synthesis and characterisation of poly(glycerol sebacate)-co-lactic acid as surgical sealants , 2011 .

[2]  M. Cima,et al.  Zero-order controlled release of ciprofloxacin-HCl from a reservoir-based, bioresorbable and elastomeric device. , 2010, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[3]  V. Koivisto,et al.  Metabolic response to lactitol and xylitol in healthy men. , 1997, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[4]  R. McCuskey,et al.  Subcutaneous implants of polypropylene filaments. , 1976, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[5]  W. Cook,et al.  In vitro enzymatic degradation of poly (glycerol sebacate)-based materials. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[6]  Delara Motlagh,et al.  Hemocompatibility evaluation of poly(glycerol-sebacate) in vitro for vascular tissue engineering. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[7]  G. Tarnowski Further Studies of Polymers as Carcinogenic Agents in Animals , 1955 .

[8]  Salthouse Tn,et al.  Polyglactin 910 suture absorption and the role of cellular enzymes. , 1976 .

[9]  Aldo R Boccaccini,et al.  An elastomeric patch derived from poly(glycerol sebacate) for delivery of embryonic stem cells to the heart. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[10]  D. Williams,et al.  The biodegradation of poly(ether urethanes). , 1987, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[11]  D. Williams,et al.  The enzymatic degradation of polymers in vitro. , 1987, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[12]  P Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Enzymatic activity toward poly(L-lactic acid) implants. , 1990, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[13]  Aldo R Boccaccini,et al.  Characterisation of a soft elastomer poly(glycerol sebacate) designed to match the mechanical properties of myocardial tissue. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[14]  K. Clarke,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of remodeling by cardiac elastomeric tissue scaffold biomaterials in a rat model of myocardial infarction. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[15]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  Mechanical properties of biodegradable polymer sutures coated with bioactive glass , 2002, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[16]  L. Sestoft,et al.  An Evaluation of Biochemical Aspects of Intravenous Fructose, Sorbitol and Xylitol Administration in Man , 1985, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[17]  C. Bettinger Biodegradable elastomers for tissue engineering and cell-biomaterial interactions. , 2011, Macromolecular bioscience.

[18]  Robert Langer,et al.  Endothelialized microvasculature based on a biodegradable elastomer. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[19]  Robert Langer,et al.  In vivo degradation characteristics of poly(glycerol sebacate). , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[20]  S. Hamid Handbook of Polymer Degradation , 2000 .

[21]  W. Cook,et al.  The mechanical characteristics and in vitro biocompatibility of poly(glycerol sebacate)-bioglass elastomeric composites. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[22]  R. Langer,et al.  A tough biodegradable elastomer , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  Joseph P Vacanti,et al.  Biocompatibility analysis of poly(glycerol sebacate) as a nerve guide material. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[24]  C. Sundback,et al.  Degradation behavior of poly(glycerol sebacate). , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[25]  G. Simon,et al.  Manipulation of mechanical compliance of elastomeric PGS by incorporation of halloysite nanotubes for soft tissue engineering applications. , 2011, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[26]  G. E. Visscher,et al.  Biodegradation of and tissue reaction to poly(DL-lactide) microcapsules. , 1986, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[27]  K. Ellwood Methods available to estimate the energy values of sugar alcohols. , 1995, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[28]  E. Stanley,et al.  Elastomeric nanocomposites as cell delivery vehicles and cardiac support devices , 2010 .

[29]  Dan Gilead,et al.  Degradable polymers : principles and applications , 1995 .

[30]  Donnie F. Williams Enzymic Hydrolysis of Polylactic Acid , 1981 .

[31]  J. Karp,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of photocurable elastomers from poly(glycerol-co-sebacate). , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[32]  P. Flory Principles of polymer chemistry , 1953 .