VAK or VAK‐uous? Towards the trivialisation of learning and the death of scholarship

Developments within education, psychology and the neurosciences have shed a great deal of light on how we learn while, at the same time, confirming for us all that learning is a profoundly complex process and far from understood. Against this background, and in this position article, we consider the recent rise in interest in the concept of learning styles as VAK (visual, auditory, kinaesthetic) in primary schools in England and Wales and begin to identify and interrogate some of the more unorthodox claims frequently used to legitimise and lend support to its validity. Through the casual acceptance and promotion of VAK, and its often wider association with the notions of accelerated and brain‐based learning, it is our assertion that the complexity of learning is becoming increasingly trivialised and scholarship at all levels within certain sectors of the education community compromised.

[1]  Af Gregorc,et al.  Gregorc style delineator: A self-assessment instrument for adults. , 1985 .

[2]  O. Hn,et al.  Education and the Brain : A Bridge Too Far , 2005 .

[3]  U. Goswami,et al.  About learning: report of the Learning Working Group , 2005 .

[4]  Eric Jensen Brain-Based Learning and Teaching , 1995 .

[5]  M. Valcke,et al.  Mapping the Learning Styles “Jungle”: An overview of the literature based on citation analysis , 2004 .

[6]  E. Boyle,et al.  Learning styles and academic outcome: the validity and utility of Vermunt's Inventory of Learning Styles in a British higher education setting. , 2003, The British journal of educational psychology.

[7]  G. Pask STYLES AND STRATEGIES OF LEARNING , 1976 .

[8]  Spencer Kagan,et al.  Multiple intelligences : the complete MI book , 1998 .

[9]  G. Dryden The Learning Revolution , 1994 .

[10]  W. Lynch Multiple Intelligences: Howard Gardner (New York: Basic Books, 1993) , 1995 .

[11]  L. Curry An Organization of Learning Styles Theory and Constructs. , 1983 .

[12]  R. Dunn,et al.  Survey of research on learning styles , 1989 .

[13]  H. Gardner Multiple intelligences : the theory in practice , 1993 .

[14]  U. Goswami A quick primer on brain development , 2004 .

[15]  R. Riding,et al.  Cognitive Styles—an overview and integration , 1991 .

[16]  James P. Byrnes,et al.  The Educational Relevance of Research in Cognitive Neuroscience , 1998 .

[17]  L. Curry A Critique of the Research on Learning Styles. , 1990 .

[18]  R. Chartock,et al.  Identifying Local Links to the World. , 1991 .

[19]  S. Cassidy,et al.  Learning Styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures , 2004 .

[20]  R. Sternberg The Triarchic Mind: A New Theory of Human Intelligence , 1988 .

[21]  T. C. Bello COMPARISON OF ELEVEN MAJOR LEARNING STYLES MODELS: VARIABLES, APPROPRIATE POPULATIONS, VALIDITY OF INSTRUMENTATION, AND THE RESEARCH BEHIND THEM , 1990 .

[22]  H. Gardner,et al.  Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences , 1983 .

[23]  I. B. Myers Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[24]  F. Coffield Should We Be Using Learning Styles? What Research Has to Say to Practice , 2004 .

[25]  Sherman Rosenfeld,et al.  Developing Teacher Sensitivity to Individual Learning Differences , 2004 .

[26]  L. Cohen,et al.  Research Methods in Education , 1980 .

[27]  K. Thompson Cognitive and Analytical Psychology Howard Gardner .Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York, Basic Books, 1983. , 1985 .

[28]  J. Geake,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience: implications for education? , 2003 .

[29]  Christopher W. Allinson,et al.  The Cognitive Style Index: A Measure of Intuition‐Analysis For Organizational Research , 1996 .

[30]  H. Gardner Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century , 1999 .

[31]  R. Riding,et al.  Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies , 2013 .

[32]  Michael W. O'Boyle,et al.  On the Relevance of Research Findings in Cognitive Neuroscience to Educational Practice , 1998 .

[33]  James W. Keefe,et al.  Learning Style Profile: Examiner's Manual. , 1986 .

[34]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Strategic alertness and expanded awareness within sophisticated conceptions of teaching , 2000 .

[35]  Harold Harty,et al.  Toward the development of a children's science curiosity measure , 1984 .

[36]  Howard Gardner: The Myth of Multiple Intelligences , 2005 .

[37]  N. Entwistle Styles of learning and teaching: An integrated outline of educational psychology for students , 1988 .

[38]  Catherine S. Jarjisian The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and How Schools Should Teach , 1992 .

[39]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[40]  S. Blakemore,et al.  The implications of recent developments in neuroscience for research on teaching and learning by , 2003 .

[41]  Paul L. Gardner,et al.  The dimensionality of attitude scales : a widely misunderstood idea , 1996 .

[42]  B. Akkoyunlu,et al.  Kolb learning style inventory , 1993 .

[43]  C. Evans,et al.  Exploring the Relationship between Cognitive Style and Teaching Style , 2004 .

[44]  J. Bransford How people learn , 2000 .