Mind Wandering During Learning with an Intelligent Tutoring System

Mind wandering (zoning out) can be detrimental to learning outcomes in a host of educational activities, from reading to watching video lectures, yet it has received little attention in the field of intelligent tutoring systems (ITS). In the current study, participants self-reported mind wandering during a learning session with Guru, a dialogue-based ITS for biology. On average, participants interacted with Guru for 22 minutes and reported an average of 11.5 instances of mind wandering, or one instance every two minutes. The frequency of mind wandering was compared across five different phases of Guru (Common-Ground-Building Instruction, Intermittent Summary, Concept Map, Scaffolded Dialogue, and Cloze task), each requiring different learning strategies. The rate of mind wandering per minute was highest during the Common-Ground-Building Instruction and Scaffolded Dialogue phases of Guru. Importantly, there was significant negative correlation between mind wandering and learning, highlighting the need to address this phenomena during learning with ITSs.

[1]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Guru: A Computer Tutor That Models Expert Human Tutors , 2012, ITS.

[2]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  LitmanDiane,et al.  When Does Disengagement Correlate with Performance in Spoken Dialog Computer Tutoring , 2013 .

[4]  Sidney K. D'Mello,et al.  Toward Fully Automated Person-Independent Detection of Mind Wandering , 2014, UMAP.

[5]  Sidney K. D'Mello,et al.  Automated Physiological-Based Detection of Mind Wandering during Learning , 2014, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[6]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  Mind-wandering While Reading: Attentional Decoupling, Mindless Reading and the Cascade Model of Inattention , 2011, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[7]  J. Smallwood,et al.  Counting the cost of an absent mind: Mind wandering as an underrecognized influence on educational performance , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Joanna Drummond,et al.  In the Zone: Towards Detecting Student Zoning Out Using Supervised Machine Learning , 2010, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[9]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Guru: Designing a Conversational Expert Intelligent Tutoring System , 2012 .

[10]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[11]  Joseph E. Beck,et al.  Engagement tracing: using response times to model student disengagement , 2005, AIED.

[12]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Modeling and understanding students' off-task behavior in intelligent tutoring systems , 2007, CHI.

[13]  J. Smallwood,et al.  The restless mind. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  Nicola C. Anderson,et al.  Everyday Attention: Variation in Mind Wandering and Memory in a Lecture , 2012 .

[15]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Students pay attention! , 2009 .

[16]  W. Schneider,et al.  The nature of mind wandering during reading varies with the cognitive control demands of the reading strategy , 2013, Brain Research.

[17]  Leonard M. Giambra,et al.  The Consistency across Vigilance and Reading Tasks of Individual Differences in the Occurrence of Task-Unrelated and Task-Related Images and Thoughts , 1990 .

[18]  Jonathan S. A. Carriere,et al.  The way we encounter reading material influences how frequently we mind wander , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[19]  M. Chi,et al.  The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes , 2014 .

[20]  Diane J. Litman,et al.  When Does Disengagement Correlate with Performance in Spoken Dialog Computer Tutoring? , 2011, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[21]  Evan F. Risko,et al.  Attention in Educational Contexts: The Role of the Learning Task in Guiding Attention , 2015 .

[22]  D. Besner,et al.  On the link between mind wandering and task performance over time , 2014, Consciousness and Cognition.

[23]  Karl K. Szpunar,et al.  Mind wandering and education: from the classroom to online learning , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[24]  Rafael A. Calvo,et al.  Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[25]  P. Silvia,et al.  For Whom the Mind Wanders, and When , 2007, Psychological science.

[26]  J. P. Mclean,et al.  Daydreaming and its correlates in an educational environment , 2011 .

[27]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners' cognitive-affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..