Integrating Interactive Clothing and Cyber-Physical Systems: A Humanistic Design Perspective

This study is aimed at bridging the gap from a transdisciplinary perspective between cyber-physical systems (CPS) architecture in the field of information science and emotional design in the field of humanistic science for interactive fashion innovation. Information related to a familiar feeling in the process of interactive clothing design is used to explain how the transformation could be realized from data. By creating the cyber-physical-clothing systems (CPCS), the architecture model in the hyper world and takes the development process of an interactive parent-child clothing as a case study for analyzing the transformation from the physical signal input to the social symbol recognition output. The experimental results, which from the perspective of clothing art design rather than information discipline, show that interactive parent-child clothing is not only suitable for the rehabilitation of autistic children but also recognized by most parents. The reasonable embedding of sensing technology can greatly enhance the added value of clothing products. This study provides a fruitful practical application reference for designers who are engaged in the field of art and design but not familiar with the relevant information technology. Furthermore, the application principle and the technical process of CPCS for further interactive clothing design is explained.

[1]  Y. K. Kim,et al.  Wearable body sensor network for health care applications , 2016 .

[2]  Will Luers.  The Social Machine: Designs for Living Online , 2016, Leonardo.

[3]  Insup Lee,et al.  Cyber-physical systems: The next computing revolution , 2010, Design Automation Conference.

[4]  W. Staal,et al.  Stop and Change: Inhibition and Flexibility Skills Are Related to Repetitive Behavior in Children and Young Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2015, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[5]  Robin Wright,et al.  Wearable Technology: If the Tech Fits, Wear It , 2014 .

[6]  Myounghoon Jeon,et al.  Emotions and Affect in Human Factors and Human–Computer Interaction: Taxonomy, Theories, Approaches, and Methods , 2017 .

[7]  Rebecca Chiyoko King-O’Riain.  Enduring or Crossing Distance for Love? Negotiating Love and Distance in the Lives of Mixed Transnational Couples , 2016 .

[8]  David Harrison,et al.  The future design direction of Smart Clothing development , 2005 .

[9]  Te-Lin Chung,et al.  Attitudes and Purchase Intentions for Smart Clothing , 2016 .

[10]  Fatma Kalaoglu,et al.  Developing a Smart Clothing System for Blinds Based on Information Axiom , 2013, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[11]  S. Lethbridge.  The Horror of Clothing and the Clothing of Horror: Material and Meaning in Gothic and Sensation Fiction , 2017 .

[12]  Wenbin Li,et al.  WaaS: Wisdom as a Service , 2014, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[13]  Myungsu Lee,et al.  Developing a SEIL (Smart Enjoy Interact Light) bag utilizing LED display , 2016 .

[14]  Natasha D. Schüll.  Data for life: Wearable technology and the design of self-care , 2016, BioSocieties.

[15]  Fang Yuan,et al.  Human-centred design blending smart technology with emotional responses: Case study on interactive clothing for couples , 2017 .

[16]  Weidong Huang,et al.  Towards Preventative Healthcare: A Review of Wearable and Mobile Applications , 2018, ICIMTH.

[17]  Paschalis Bizopoulos,et al.  Sparsely Activated Networks , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[18]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Social Textiles: Social Affordances and Icebreaking Interactions Through Wearable Social Messaging , 2015, TEI.

[19]  Jianhua Ma,et al.  Cybermatics: Cyber-physical-social-thinking hyperspace based science and technology , 2016, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[20]  Isabel G. Trindade,et al.  Design and Evaluation of Novel Textile Wearable Systems for the Surveillance of Vital Signals , 2016, Sensors.

[21]  H. Chang,et al.  Clothing selection motivations and the meaning of possessions for tweens in a foster care group home , 2018 .

[22]  J. Crawley,et al.  GABAB Receptor Agonist R-Baclofen Reverses Social Deficits and Reduces Repetitive Behavior in Two Mouse Models of Autism , 2015, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[23]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Physical-Cyber-Social Computing: An Early 21st Century Approach , 2013, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[24]  S. Kaiser.  The Social Psychology of Clothing: Symbolic Appearances in Context , 1996 .

[25]  Y. Nagai,et al.  DESIGN OPTIMIZATION FOR INTERACTIVE PARENT-CHILD CLOTHING: INTEGRATION OF IOT TECHNOLOGY ENTITIES AND EMOTIONAL VIRTUAL BODIES , 2018 .

[26]  Min Chen,et al.  Emotion Communication System , 2017, IEEE Access.

[27]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  Joint inference of user community and interest patterns in social interaction networks , 2017, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[28]  Teresa K. W. Wong,et al.  Abnormal spatiotemporal processing of emotional facial expressions in childhood autism: dipole source analysis of event‐related potentials , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  Eunyoung Lee,et al.  Development and Wearability Evaluation of All-Fabric Integrated Smart Jacket for a Temperature-regulating System Based on User Experience Design , 2016 .

[30]  Yukari Nagai,et al.  Interactive technology embedded in fashion emotional design Case study on interactive clothing for couples , 2018 .

[31]  Min Chen,et al.  Smart Clothing: Connecting Human with Clouds and Big Data for Sustainable Health Monitoring , 2016, Mobile Networks and Applications.

[32]  Sara Keel.  Socialization: Parent-Child Interaction in Everyday Life , 2016 .

[33]  Kun-Pyo Lee,et al.  Wearable-object-based interaction for a mobile audio device , 2010, CHI EA '10.

[34]  Shu-Guang Kuai,et al.  A social interaction field model accurately identifies static and dynamic social groupings , 2019, Nature Human Behaviour.

[35]  Jay Lee,et al.  A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems , 2015 .

[36]  Franz Konstantin Fuss,et al.  Design and evaluation of smart wearable undergarment for monitoring physiological extremes in firefighting , 2014, ISWC '14 Adjunct.

[37]  Harry Brighouse,et al.  Family Values: The Ethics of Parent-Child Relationships , 2014 .

[38]  Alice M. Mulvehill,et al.  Social Machines , 2016, Apress.

[39]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  bioLogic: Natto Cells as Nanoactuators for Shape Changing Interfaces , 2015, CHI.

[40]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Harnessing the hygroscopic and biofluorescent behaviors of genetically tractable microbial cells to design biohybrid wearables , 2017, Science Advances.

[41]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Secure Control: Towards Survivable Cyber-Physical Systems , 2008, 2008 The 28th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops.

[42]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Physical-Cyber-Social Computing: Looking Back, Looking Forward , 2015, IEEE Internet Comput..

[43]  Edward A. Lee.  Cyber Physical Systems: Design Challenges , 2008, 2008 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC).