Biomechanical approach for the assessment of contacts with deformable objects

Forensic and biomechanical assessment in case of blunt force trauma can be a challenging task especially when deformable striking objects are used. Evaluations solely based on empirical knowledge can lead to misjudgments. Semi-quantitative and quantitative investigations give the forensic assessment a scientific basis comprising experimental and calculation methods. Based on a real case where a car wheel was used as a striking object, our work presents a simple test setup for contact force estimation in head contacts with deformable contact partners. Our approach combines experimental measurements using a single accelerometer and calculations applying the conservation of linear momentum and Newton’s second law. Both experimental and calculation results are discussed in terms of validity, reproducibility, and plausibility. With regard to our case, we can conclude that the injury pattern without skull fractures does not confound multiple strikes with a wheel. Skull fractures and potential fatal injuries had not to be expected assuming a head-carcass contact in case of a non-supported head. The approach presented can be applied to any case where deformable or uncommon blunt objects are used.

[1]  J. Melvin,et al.  Accidental Injury: Biomechanics and Prevention , 1993 .

[2]  Jaakko Laine,et al.  Measurement, Analysis and Modelling of the Vibrations of a Tyre by Using a Single Embedded Accelerometer , 2016 .

[3]  John-Martin Hempel,et al.  Biomechanics and injury risk of a headbutt , 2011, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[4]  J Sandover,et al.  The damaging punch. , 1985, British medical journal.

[5]  Jiri Adamec,et al.  Numerical human models for accident research and safety - potentials and limitations. , 2008, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[6]  R. Blickhan,et al.  Biomechanical assessment of the injury risk of stomping , 2015, Zeitschrift für Rechtsmedizin.

[7]  Steffen Peldschus,et al.  Development of a strain rate dependent material model of human cortical bone for computer-aided reconstruction of injury mechanisms. , 2014, Forensic science international.

[8]  C. Y. Warner,et al.  Force/deflection and fracture characteristics of the temporo-parietal region of the human head , 1991 .

[9]  J Missliwetz [Criminal circumstances and picture of intentional physical injuries (with special reference to the use of weapons)]. , 1990, Beitrage zur gerichtlichen Medizin.

[10]  Jiri Adamec,et al.  Estimation of effective mass of longish rigid instruments in head impacts , 2010, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[11]  Steffen Peldschus,et al.  Experimental tests for the validation of active numerical human models. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[12]  Werner Goldsmith,et al.  A Biomechanical Analysis of the Causes of Traumatic Brain Injury in Infants and Children , 2004, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[13]  C. Rode,et al.  Influence of striking technique on maximum striking velocities—experimental and statistical investigation , 2018, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[14]  I. Amidror Sub-Nyquist artifacts and sampling moiré effects, Part 2: Spectral-domain analysis , 2015 .

[15]  R. Eppinger,et al.  Biomechanics of Lateral Skull Fracture , 2003 .

[16]  T. Walilko,et al.  Biomechanics of the head for Olympic boxer punches to the face , 2005, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[17]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanics of temporo-parietal skull fracture. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[18]  R. Bouquet,et al.  PELVIS HUMAN RESPONSE TO LATERAL IMPACT , 1998 .

[19]  C. Rode,et al.  Maximum striking velocities in strikes with steel rods—the influence of rod length, rod mass and volunteer parameters , 2018, International Journal of Legal Medicine.