A survey of visitors on Swedish livestock farms with reference to the spread of animal diseases

BackgroundIn addition to livestock movements, other between-farm contacts such as visitors may contribute to the spread of contagious animal diseases. Knowledge about such contacts is essential for contingency planning. Preventive measures, risk-based surveillance and contact tracing may be facilitated if the frequency and type of between-farm contacts can be assessed for different types of farms. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and types of visitors on farms with cloven-hoofed animals in Sweden and to analyse whether there were differences in the number of visitors attributable to region, season, and type of herd. Data were collected from Swedish farmers through contact-logs covering two-week periods during four different seasons.ResultsIn total, 482 (32%) farmers filled in the contact log for at least one period and the data represent 18,416 days. The average number of professional and non-professional visitors per day was 0.3 and 0.8, respectively. Whereas the number of professional visitors seemed to increase with increasing herd size, this relation was not seen for non-professional visits. The mean numbers of visitors per day were highest in the summer and in the farm category ‘small mixed farm’. Reports of the visitors’ degree of contact with the animals showed that veterinarians, AI-technicians, animal transporters and neighbours were often in direct contact with the animals or entered the stables and 8.8% of the repairmen were also in direct contact with animals, which was unexpected. In a multivariable analysis, species, herd size and season were significantly associated with the number of professional visitors as well as the number of visitors in direct contact with the animals.ConclusionIn conclusion there was a large variation between farms in the number and type of contacts. The number of visitors that may be more likely to spread diseases between farms was associated with animal species and herd size.

[1]  A A Dijkhuizen,et al.  Probability of and risk factors for introduction of infectious diseases into Dutch SPF dairy farms: a cohort study. , 2002, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[2]  A. de Kruif,et al.  Type and frequency of contacts between Belgian pig herds. , 2009, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[3]  M. Nöremark,et al.  Network analysis of cattle and pig movements in Sweden: measures relevant for disease control and risk based surveillance. , 2011, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[4]  Ann Lindberg,et al.  Disease awareness, information retrieval and change in biosecurity routines among pig farmers in association with the first PRRS outbreak in Sweden. , 2009, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[5]  R. Christley,et al.  Direct and indirect contacts between cattle farms in north-west England. , 2008, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[6]  T E Carpenter,et al.  Direct and indirect contact rates among beef, dairy, goat, sheep, and swine herds in three California counties, with reference to control of potential foot-and-mouth disease transmission. , 2001, American journal of veterinary research.

[7]  D. C. Blood,et al.  Veterinary Medicine: A Textbook of the Diseases of Cattle, Sheep, Pigs, Goats and Horses , 1994 .

[8]  Epidemiology: Risk factors for introduction of BHV1 into BHV1‐free Dutch dairy farms: A case‐control study , 2001, The Veterinary quarterly.

[9]  M. Nöremark,et al.  Application of routines that contribute to on-farm biosecurity as reported by Swedish livestock farmers. , 2010, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[10]  B. Martínez-López,et al.  A simulation model for the potential spread of foot-and-mouth disease in the Castile and Leon region of Spain. , 2010, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[11]  P. A. Wing,et al.  Yearbook of agricultural statistics , 1969 .

[12]  A. A. Dijkhuizen,et al.  Quantification of contacts between Dutch farms to assess the potential risk of foot-and-mouth disease spread. , 1996 .

[13]  R L Sanson,et al.  A survey to investigate movements off sheep and cattle farms in New Zealand, with reference to the potential transmission of foot-and-mouth disease , 2005, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[14]  C. Heuer,et al.  Risk factors for seropositivity to bovine coronavirus and bovine respiratory syncytial virus in dairy herds , 2010, Veterinary Record.

[15]  M. Nöremark,et al.  Spatial and temporal investigations of reported movements, births and deaths of cattle and pigs in Sweden , 2009, Acta veterinaria Scandinavica.

[16]  J. Frössling,et al.  Spatio-temporal evaluation of cattle trade in Sweden: description of a grid network visualization technique. , 2010, Geospatial health.

[17]  R S Morris,et al.  InterSpread Plus: a spatial and stochastic simulation model of disease in animal populations. , 2013, Preventive veterinary medicine.