The tradeoff of accuracy with different landmarks with manifold learning

High-dimensional data such as hyperspectral images contain abundant information of surface radiation. But the massive redundant information makes it complex to be utilized conveniently. To solve this problem, a manifold learning dimensionality reduction framework for hyperspectral image is proposed. Firstly, statistical sampling methods were used to sample a subset of data points as landmarks. A skeleton of the manifold was then identified basing on the landmarks. The remaining data points were then inserted into the skeleton by Locally Linear Embedding algorithm. At last, original data sets and data sets reduced with different manifold learning approaches were classified by KNN classifier to evaluate the performance of the proposed framework. The framework was tested on AVIRIS Salinas-A dataset. The experimental results showed that the tradeoff of accuracy with different landmarks is of great significant. Insufficient landmarks lead to low accuracy and excess landmarks may spend a considerable amount of time.

[1]  张振跃,et al.  Principal Manifolds and Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction via Tangent Space Alignment , 2004 .

[2]  Liangpei Zhang,et al.  Dimensionality Reduction Based on Clonal Selection for Hyperspectral Imagery , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Global Versus Local Methods in Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction , 2002, NIPS.

[4]  M. Lennon,et al.  Independent component analysis as a tool for the dimensionality reduction and the representation of hyperspectral images , 2001, IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217).

[5]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.

[6]  Guangyi Chen,et al.  Dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral imagery using improved locally linear embedding , 2007 .

[7]  Robert P. W. Duin,et al.  Dimensionality Reduction of Hyperspectral Data via Spectral Feature Extraction , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Spatially Coherent Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction and Segmentation of Hyperspectral Images , 2007, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[9]  Eric O. Postma,et al.  Dimensionality Reduction: A Comparative Review , 2008 .

[10]  Guoqing Zhou,et al.  Adaptive graph construction for Isomap manifold learning , 2015, Electronic Imaging.

[11]  James E. Fowler,et al.  Locality-Preserving Dimensionality Reduction and Classification for Hyperspectral Image Analysis , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Hongyuan Zha,et al.  Adaptive Manifold Learning , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  Santosh S. Vempala,et al.  Matrix approximation and projective clustering via volume sampling , 2006, SODA '06.

[14]  Yaohang Li,et al.  High-dimensional MRI data analysis using a large-scale manifold learning approach , 2013, Machine Vision and Applications.

[15]  Ameet Talwalkar,et al.  Large-scale SVD and manifold learning , 2013, J. Mach. Learn. Res..