What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers?

[1]  Necmi Kemal Avkiran,et al.  Scientific collaboration in finance does not lead to better quality research , 2006, Scientometrics.

[2]  Grant Lewison,et al.  The effect of funding on the outputs of biomedical research , 2006, Scientometrics.

[3]  H. Herbertz,et al.  Does it pay to cooperate? A bibliometric case study in molecular biology , 1995, Scientometrics.

[4]  Bluma C. Peritz.  On the heuristic value of scientific publications and their design; A citation analysis of some clinical trials , 2005, Scientometrics.

[5]  Francis Narin,et al.  Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers , 1991, Scientometrics.

[6]  Daryl E. Chubin,et al.  Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? , 1979, Scientometrics.

[7]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[8]  D. King.  The scientific impact of nations , 2004, Nature.

[9]  PHILLIP CASSEY,et al.  Publication and Rejection among Successful Ecologists , 2004 .

[10]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance , 2001, Scientometrics.

[11]  T. White,et al.  The abundance of invertebrate herbivores in relation to the availability of nitrogen in stressed food plants , 1984, Oecologia.

[12]  R. Kostoff.  The (scientific) wealth of nations , 2004 .

[13]  P. Lawrence.  The politics of publication , 2003, Nature.

[14]  Julia Koricheva,et al.  Non-significant results in ecology: a burden or a blessing in disguise? , 2003 .

[15]  Tom Tregenza,et al.  Gender bias in the refereeing process , 2002 .

[16]  R. Wears,et al.  Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. , 2002, JAMA.

[17]  C. Gluud,et al.  Citation bias of hepato-biliary randomized clinical trials. , 2002, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  P. Murtaugh,et al.  JOURNAL QUALITY, EFFECT SIZE, AND PUBLICATION BIAS IN META-ANALYSIS , 2002 .

[19]  David Adam,et al.  Citation analysis: The counting house , 2002, Nature.

[20]  Julia Koricheva,et al.  META-ANALYSIS OF SOURCES OF VARIATION IN FITNESS COSTS OF PLANT ANTIHERBIVORE DEFENSES , 2002 .

[21]  D. Cases,et al.  How can we investigate citation behavior?: a study of reasons for citing literature in communication , 2000 .

[22]  Donald Owen Case,et al.  How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Janne S. Kotiaho,et al.  Unfamiliar citations breed mistakes , 1999, Nature.

[24]  Janne S. Kotiaho,et al.  Papers vanish in mis-citation black hole , 1999, Nature.

[25]  S. Baldi.  Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations : A network-analytic model , 1998 .

[26]  Marino Gatto,et al.  Region-based citation bias in science , 1998, Nature.

[27]  J. Koricheva,et al.  Regulation of Woody Plant Secondary Metabolism by Resource Availability: Hypothesis Testing by Means of Meta-Analysis , 1998 .

[28]  P. Seglen,et al.  Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research. , 1998, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[29]  J. Koricheva,et al.  Insect performance on experimentally stressed woody plants: a meta-analysis. , 1998, Annual review of entomology.

[30]  Tom Tregenza.  Darwin a better name than Wallace? , 1997, Nature.

[31]  T. Opthof,et al.  Sense and nonsense about the impact factor. , 1997, Cardiovascular research.

[32]  W. Shadish,et al.  Author Judgements about Works They Cite: Three Studies from Psychology Journals , 1995 .

[33]  Journal Citation Impact Factors and Parochial Citation Practices , 1995, The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America.

[34]  U. Ravnskov.  Quotation bias in reviews of the diet-heart idea. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[35]  Elisabeth Davenport,et al.  Who Cites women? Whom do women cite?: an Exploration of Gender and scholarly citation in Sociology , 1995, J. Documentation.

[36]  Per Ottar Seglen,et al.  Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact , 1994 .

[37]  E. Garfield,et al.  Citation data: their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy-making , 1992 .

[38]  D. Herms,et al.  The Dilemma of Plants: To Grow or Defend , 1992, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[39]  U. Ravnskov,et al.  Cholesterol lowering trials in coronary heart disease: frequency of citation and outcome. , 1992, BMJ.

[40]  P. Price.  The Plant Vigor Hypothesis and Herbivore Attack , 1991 .

[41]  Lawrence B. Slobodkin,et al.  A Critique for Ecology , 1991 .

[42]  P. W. Bezukladnikov.  Not the first , 1990, Nature.

[43]  ANDERS PAPE Møller.  National citations , 1990, Nature.

[44]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Citation analysis and the science policy arena , 1989 .

[45]  P. Gøtzsche.  Reference bias in reports of drug trials. , 1987, British medical journal.

[46]  Terrence A. Brooks,et al.  Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations , 1985, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[47]  L. Beach,et al.  The citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judgment and decision literature. , 1984 .

[48]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory , 1983 .

[49]  G. Gilbert.  Referencing as Persuasion , 1977 .

[50]  E. Garfield.  Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.