Diffraction signature analysis methods for improving scatterometry precision

Scatterometry is a fast, non-destructive critical dimension (CD) optical metrology technique based on the analysis of light scattered from a periodic array of features. With technological advances in manufacturing, semiconductor devices are made in ever shrinking geometries. In recent years, the ability of scatterometry metrology tools to measure these devices at a gage-capable level for parameters such as CD, thickness or profile has become more challenging. The focus of this research is to analyze the acquired diffraction signature and determine an optimum diffraction signature "scan path." An optimized scan path can result in higher precision, reduced development time, smaller pre-generated library databases and faster real-time optimization speeds. In this work, we will first review several methods for scan path selection and optimization. Our results indicate that the method choice can influence the scan path selection, and that some of the methods are complementary to one another. For example, one method, which we term orthogonal sensitivity, uses intelligent algorithms to select optimal scan path points based on enhancing single parameter sensitivity. While the method works well, it neglects parameter correlation effects. Thus, we will also review a method where correlation effects are considered. Finally, we will calculate and summarize the effectiveness of optimal scan path selection techniques using challenging lithography applications.

[1]  Roger Lowe-Webb,et al.  Novel diffraction-based spectroscopic method for overlay metrology , 2003, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Christopher J. Raymond,et al.  Scatterometry for the measurement of metal features , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Prasad Dasari,et al.  Lithography tool qualification using angular scatterometry , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Sheng-Hua Lu,et al.  Comparisons of overlay measurement using conventional bright-field microscope and angular scatterometer , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Christopher J. Raymond,et al.  Scatterometry for shallow trench isolation (STI) process metrology , 2001, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Christopher J. Raymond,et al.  Asymmetric line profile measurement using angular scatterometry , 2001, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[7]  P. Rudolph,et al.  Improved shallow trench isolation and gate process control using scatterometry based metrology , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Gary Zhang,et al.  Scatterometer-based scanner fingerprinting technique(ScatterLith) and its applications in image field and ACLV analysis , 2003, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Costas J. Spanos,et al.  Specular spectroscopic scatterometry in DUV lithography , 1999, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Christopher J. Raymond,et al.  Novel implementations of scatterometry for lithography process control , 2002, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Pierre Boher,et al.  A new analysis strategy for CD metrology using rapid photo goniometry method , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Neal Lafferty,et al.  Gauge control for sub-170-nm DRAM product features , 2001, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Christopher J. Raymond,et al.  Applications of angular scatterometry for the measurement of multiply periodic features , 2003, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[14]  Steve Farrer,et al.  Scatterometry measurements for process monitoring of polysilicon gate etch , 1997, Advanced Lithography.

[15]  Robert A. Soper,et al.  Scatterometry for post-etch polysilicon gate metrology , 1999, Advanced Lithography.

[16]  Kenneth C. Johnson,et al.  Scatterometry-based overlay metrology , 2003, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[17]  Burn Jeng Lin,et al.  Application of 3D scatterometry to contacts and vias at 90nm and beyond , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[18]  Prasad Dasari,et al.  Metal etcher qualification using angular scatterometry , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.