From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence

Most literally, objectification refers to perceiving a person as an object, and consequently, less than fully human. Research on perceptions of humanness and the stereotype content model suggests that humanness is linked to perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Merging these insights with objectification theory, we hypothesized that focusing on a woman's, but not a man's, appearance should induce objectification, and thus reduce perceptions of these characteristics. In three studies, females, but not males, were perceived as less competent (Studies 2 and 3) and less warm and moral (Studies 1, 2 and 3) when participants were instructed to focus on their appearance. These findings support our position and help rule out stereotype activation as an alternative explanation to dehumanization. Further, they generalized to targets of different races, familiarity, physical attractiveness and occupational status. Implications for gender inequity and the perpetuation of objectification of women are discussed.

[1]  N. Haslam,et al.  More human than you: attributing humanness to self and others. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  S. Fiske,et al.  Dehumanizing the Lowest of the Low , 2006, Psychological science.

[3]  D. Buss,et al.  Strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation: sex and context effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. , 1996, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

[4]  Jeroen Vaes,et al.  Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others , 2010 .

[5]  Bogdan Wojciszke,et al.  Affective Concomitants of Information on Morality and Competence. , 2005 .

[6]  Martha Craven Nussbaum,et al.  Sex and Social Justice , 2000 .

[7]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. , 1996 .

[8]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[9]  G. Clore,et al.  Disgust as Embodied Moral Judgment , 2008, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

[10]  Jeroen Vaes,et al.  Are sexualized women complete human beings? Why men and women dehumanize sexually objectified women , 2011 .

[11]  M. Heilman,et al.  Penalties for success: reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  J. Spence,et al.  Instrumental and Expressive Traits, Trait Stereotypes, and Sexist Attitudes: What Do They Signify? , 2000 .

[14]  T. Roberts,et al.  The Birthmark: An Existential Account of Why Women are Objectified , 2010 .

[15]  Rachel W. Kallen,et al.  The Disruptive Effect of Self-Objectification on Performance , 2006 .

[16]  Yoshihisa Kashima,et al.  Subhuman, inhuman, and superhuman: Contrasting humans with nonhumans in three cultures , 2008 .

[17]  N. Haslam,et al.  Animals and Androids , 2007, Psychological science.

[18]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Group virtue: the importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  William H. Glick,et al.  Resume evaluations and cosmetics use: When more is not better , 1986 .

[20]  D. Wegner,et al.  Blaming God for Our Pain: Human Suffering and the Divine Mind , 2010, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[21]  T. Roberts,et al.  The Beast within the Beauty: An Existential Perspective on the Objectification and Condemnation of Women. , 2004 .

[22]  E. F. Stone-Romero,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS ON JOB‐RELATED OUTCOMES: A META‐ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES , 2003 .

[23]  A. Eagly,et al.  What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. , 1991 .

[24]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  C. Frith,et al.  Interacting minds--a biological basis. , 1999, Science.

[26]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Cognitive and affective bases of attitudes toward social groups and social policies , 1994 .

[27]  Randall P. White,et al.  Breaking the glass ceiling : can women reach the top of America's largest corporations? , 1994 .

[28]  M. Lieberman Social Cognitive Neuroscience , 2010 .

[29]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  Attributions on the brain: Neuro-imaging dispositional inferences, beyond theory of mind , 2005, NeuroImage.

[30]  S. Posavac,et al.  Women's exposure to thin-and-beautiful media images: body image effects of media-ideal internalization and impact-reduction interventions. , 2005, Body image.

[31]  Simone de Beauvoir,et al.  The Second Sex , 1949 .

[32]  Bonnie Moradi,et al.  Objectification Theory and Psychology of Women: A Decade of Advances and Future Directions , 2008 .

[33]  K. Ochsner 3. Social cognitive neuroscience: Historical development, core principles, and future promise , 2007 .

[34]  Joe C Magee,et al.  Power and the objectification of social targets. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  B. Fredrickson,et al.  Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women's Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks , 1997 .

[36]  S. Bartky Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression , 1990 .

[37]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[38]  M. Heilman,et al.  Motivated to Penalize: Women's Strategic Rejection of Successful Women , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[39]  Bogdan Wojciszke,et al.  On the Dominance of Moral Categories in Impression Formation , 1998 .

[40]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  From Agents to Objects: Sexist Attitudes and Neural Responses to Sexualized Targets , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  Jeroen Vaes,et al.  The Emotional Side of Prejudice: The Attribution of Secondary Emotions to Ingroups and Outgroups , 2000 .

[42]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Neural correlates of anchoring-and-adjustment during mentalizing , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  N. Haslam,et al.  Attributing and denying humanness to others , 2008 .

[44]  Richard L. Moreland,et al.  Exposure effects in person perception: Familiarity, similarity, and attraction , 1982 .

[45]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  Special issue: Gender in the workplace. Sex stereotypes:: Do they influence perceptions of managers? , 1995 .

[46]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[47]  David M. Noer,et al.  Center for Creative Leadership , 1995 .

[48]  Christine C. Iijima Hall,et al.  Women and “body-isms” in television beer commercials , 1994 .

[49]  N. Haslam Dehumanization: An Integrative Review , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[50]  A. Bandura Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities , 1999, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[51]  T. Wheatley,et al.  Hypnotic Disgust Makes Moral Judgments More Severe , 2005, Psychological science.

[52]  D. Wegner,et al.  Dimensions of Mind Perception , 2007, Science.

[53]  K. Fiedler,et al.  The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. , 1988 .

[54]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects , 1995 .

[55]  B. Fredrickson,et al.  That swimsuit becomes you: sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[56]  Nathan A. Heflick,et al.  Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human , 2009 .

[57]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Handbook of experimental existential psychology , 2004 .

[58]  Amanda B. Diekman,et al.  Rolling with the Changes: A Role Congruity Perspective on Gender Norms , 2006 .

[59]  C. Neil Macrae,et al.  The Link between Social Cognition and Self-referential Thought in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  The BIAS map: behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[61]  M. Tiggemann,et al.  The role of body objectification in disordered eating and depressed mood. , 2004, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[62]  G. Āllport The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[63]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social neuroscience evidence for dehumanised perception , 2009 .

[64]  William M. Kelley,et al.  A self less ordinary: The medial prefrontal cortex and you. InM.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.). Cambridge:MIT Press , 2004 .

[65]  Jack Kaminsky,et al.  Dimensions of Mind. , 1961 .